• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦全国队列中急性胆囊炎的手术治疗。

Surgical management of acute cholecystitis in a nationwide Danish cohort.

机构信息

Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, DK-2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.

Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Aug;404(5):589-597. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01802-0. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-019-01802-0
PMID:31297607
Abstract

PURPOSE

In the Danish national guidelines from 2006 on the treatment of acute cholecystitis, early laparoscopic operation within 5 days after the debut of symptoms was recommended. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome in patients with acute cholecystitis subjected to cholecystectomy in Denmark in the five-year period hereafter.

METHODS

All patients undergoing cholecystectomy in the period 2006-2010 were registered in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database, from which outcome data were collected. The effect of potential risk factors such as age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, previous pancreatitis, previous abdominal surgery, year of operation, surgical approach, and surgeon experience was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 33,853 patients registered with a cholecystectomy, 4667 (14%) were operated for acute cholecystitis. In 95% of the patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was intended and in 5% primary open access was chosen. The frequency of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery was 18%. High age and ASA score, operation in the early years of the period, and open or converted procedure all increased the risk of hospital stay to > 3 days or readmission. High age and ASA score, converted or open operation, and previous pancreatitis increased the risk of additional procedures. Postoperative mortality was 1.2%, and significant risk factors for postoperative death were age, low BMI, high ASA score, early year of operation, and open procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute cholecystectomy was safely managed laparoscopically in most patients after the introduction of national guidelines, with an increasing rate of laparoscopically completed procedures during the study period.

摘要

目的

在 2006 年丹麦国家急性胆囊炎治疗指南中,建议在症状出现后 5 天内进行早期腹腔镜手术。本研究旨在分析此后五年丹麦行胆囊切除术的急性胆囊炎患者的结局。

方法

在 2006-2010 年期间,丹麦胆囊切除术数据库中登记了所有接受胆囊切除术的患者,并从中收集了结局数据。分析了年龄、性别、BMI、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、既往胰腺炎、既往腹部手术、手术年份、手术途径和外科医生经验等潜在危险因素的影响。

结果

在登记的 33853 例胆囊切除术患者中,有 4667 例(14%)因急性胆囊炎而行手术。95%的患者计划行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,5%的患者选择初次开腹。腹腔镜转为开腹手术的频率为 18%。高龄和 ASA 评分高、手术在该时期的早期、开腹或中转手术均增加了住院时间>3 天或再次入院的风险。高龄和 ASA 评分高、中转或开腹手术以及既往胰腺炎增加了附加手术的风险。术后死亡率为 1.2%,术后死亡的显著危险因素包括年龄、低 BMI、ASA 评分高、早期手术年份和开腹手术。

结论

在国家指南出台后,大多数患者的急性胆囊切除术可安全地行腹腔镜下完成,在此期间,腹腔镜完成的手术比例逐渐增加。

相似文献

1
Surgical management of acute cholecystitis in a nationwide Danish cohort.丹麦全国队列中急性胆囊炎的手术治疗。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Aug;404(5):589-597. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01802-0. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
2
Conversion cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis-it's not as black as it's painted!急性胆囊炎患者的中转胆囊切除术——情况并非如描述的那般糟糕!
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Jun;401(4):479-88. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1394-3. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
3
Cholecystectomy for the elderly: no hesitation for otherwise healthy patients.老年人胆囊切除术:对健康状况良好的患者无需犹豫。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):171-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3144-8. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
4
The role of body mass index class in cholecystectomy after acute cholecystitis: An American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.体重指数类别在急性胆囊炎后胆囊切除术中的作用:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划分析
Surgery. 2016 Sep;160(3):699-707. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
5
Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者围手术期并发症的危险因素:对瑞士腹腔镜与胸腔镜外科学会数据库中22953例连续病例的分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.018. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
6
The quality of cholecystectomy in Denmark: outcome and risk factors for 20,307 patients from the national database.丹麦的胆囊切除术质量:来自国家数据库的 20307 例患者的结果和危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1630-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1453-8. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
7
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: critical analysis of 520 cases].[急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术:520例病例的批判性分析]
Acta Med Port. 2014 Nov-Dec;27(6):685-91. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
8
The severity grading of acute cholecystitis following the Tokyo Guidelines is the most powerful predictive factor for conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy.遵循东京指南的急性胆囊炎严重程度分级是预测腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开腹胆囊切除术的最有力因素。
J Visc Surg. 2017 Sep;154(4):239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
9
Should acute cholecystitis be operated in the 24 h following symptom onset? A retrospective cohort study.急性胆囊炎症状发作后 24 小时内应行手术治疗吗?一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jan;25:88-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.049. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
10
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis should be performed by a laparoscopic surgeon.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎应由腹腔镜外科医生进行。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Sep;24(9):2206-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0928-y. Epub 2010 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
One-year outcomes of elderly acute cholecystitis patients by index treatment.老年急性胆囊炎患者按指数治疗的一年结局
Front Surg. 2025 Jan 30;12:1500700. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1500700. eCollection 2025.
2
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Any time is a good time.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎:任何时候都是好时机。
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2023 Aug 31;27(3):271-276. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-127. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
The ChoCO-W prospective observational global study: Does COVID-19 increase gangrenous cholecystitis?

本文引用的文献

1
Small-incision cholecystectomy (through a cylinder retractor) under local anaesthesia and sedation: a prospective observational study of five hundred consecutive cases.局部麻醉和镇静下小切口胆囊切除术(通过圆柱牵开器):500例连续病例的前瞻性观察研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Sep;403(6):733-740. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1707-9. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
2
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较:一项最新的随机对照试验荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4728-4741. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6400-0. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
ChoCO-W 前瞻性观察性全球研究:COVID-19 是否会增加坏疽性胆囊炎?
World J Emerg Surg. 2022 Dec 16;17(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00466-4.
4
Chronological trends in patients undergoing cholecystectomy in Korea: a nationwide health insurance claims study.韩国胆囊切除术患者的时间趋势:一项全国性医疗保险理赔研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2022 Apr;102(4):205-213. doi: 10.4174/astr.2022.102.4.205. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
5
Assessing differences in surgical outcomes following emergency abdominal exploration for complications of elective surgery and high-risk primary emergencies.评估择期手术并发症和高危原发性急症行急诊剖腹探查术后手术结果的差异。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 25;12(1):1349. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05326-4.
6
A narrative review of acute pancreatitis and its diagnosis, pathogenetic mechanism, and management.急性胰腺炎及其诊断、发病机制和治疗的叙述性综述。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):69. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4802.
7
Predicting the difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: development and validation of a pre-operative risk score using an objective operative difficulty grading system.预测困难的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:使用客观手术难度分级系统开发和验证术前风险评分。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4549-4561. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07244-5. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
Acute calculous cholecystitis: Review of current best practices.
急性结石性胆囊炎:当前最佳实践综述
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 May 27;9(5):118-126. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i5.118.
4
Early Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis in the Elderly Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年人群急性胆囊炎的早期胆囊切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Dig Surg. 2017;34(5):371-379. doi: 10.1159/000455241. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
5
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a retrospective study assessing risk factors for conversion and complications.腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性结石性胆囊炎:一项评估中转开腹及并发症危险因素的回顾性研究
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Nov 16;11:54. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0111-4. eCollection 2016.
6
Risk-adjusted treatment selection and outcome of patients with acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎患者的风险调整治疗选择与预后
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Jun;402(4):607-614. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1508-y. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
7
2016 WSES guidelines on acute calculous cholecystitis.2016年WSES急性结石性胆囊炎指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jun 14;11:25. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0082-5. eCollection 2016.
8
Predicting length of stay and conversion to open cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis using the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines in a US population.在美国人群中使用2013年东京指南预测急性胆囊炎的住院时间及转为开腹胆囊切除术的情况。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015 Nov;22(11):795-801. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.284. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
9
Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. Systematic review and meta-analysis.开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的比较。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jun;18:196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.083. Epub 2015 May 6.
10
Operative outcome and patient satisfaction in early and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术的手术结果及患者满意度
Minim Invasive Surg. 2014;2014:162643. doi: 10.1155/2014/162643. Epub 2014 Aug 14.