Department of Echocardiography, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, 167 Beilishi Road, Beijing, 100037, China.
Department of Radiologic Imaging, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, 167 Beilishi Road, Beijing, 100037, China.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov;35(11):2029-2036. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01664-z. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
To evaluate the accuracy, reproducibility, and transcatheter heart valve (THV) sizing efficiency of an automated 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic (3D-TEE) post-processing software in the assessments of aortic roots, intra-individually compared with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). We prospectively studied 67 patients with normal aortic roots. We measured diameters of aortic annulus (AA), sinus of Valsalva (SOV), and sino-tubular junction (STJ) by full-automated and semi-automated methods using 3D-TEE datasets, then compared them to corresponding transthoracic echocardiography and MDCT values. THV sizes were chosen based on echocardiography and MDCT measurements according to recommended criterion. Taking MDCT planimetered diameters as reference, the full-automated (r: 0.4745-0.8792) and semi-automated (r: 0.6647-0.8805) 3D-TEE measurements were linearly correlated (p < 0.0001). The average differences between semi-automated or full-automated measurements and reference were 0.3 mm or 1.3 mm for AA, - 1.9 mm or - 0.5 mm for SOV, and - 0.1 mm or 1.9 mm for STJ, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients of semi-automated method were 0.79-0.96 (intra-observer) and 0.75-0.92 (inter-observer). THV sizing by semi-automated measurements using echocardiographic criteria was larger than that by MDCT measurements using MDCT criteria (p < 0.0001) but equivalent (p > 0.05) if both using MDCT standards. The new automated 3D-TEE software allows modeling and quantifying aortic roots with high reproducibility. Measurements by the semi-automated method closely approximate and well correlate with the corresponding MDCT, thus THV sizing by this modeled 3D-TEE measurements should adopt recommended MDCT criteria but not echocardiographic criteria. The full-automated 3D-TEE segmentations are yet immature. (Semi-automated assessMent of Aortic Roots by Three-dimensional transEsophageal echocaRdiography [SMARTER], NCT02724709).
为了评估一种自动化的经食管 3 维超声心动图(3D-TEE)后处理软件在评估主动脉根部方面的准确性、可重复性和经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)的尺寸测量效率,并与多排 CT(MDCT)进行个体内比较。我们前瞻性地研究了 67 例正常主动脉根部患者。我们使用 3D-TEE 数据集通过全自动和半自动方法测量主动脉瓣环(AA)、窦部(SOV)和窦管交界(STJ)的直径,并将其与相应的经胸超声心动图和 MDCT 值进行比较。THV 大小根据超声心动图和 MDCT 测量值根据推荐标准选择。以 MDCT 平面仪测量的直径为参考,全自动(r:0.4745-0.8792)和半自动(r:0.6647-0.8805)3D-TEE 测量值呈线性相关(p < 0.0001)。半自动或全自动测量值与参考值之间的平均差异分别为 AA 为 0.3 毫米或 1.3 毫米,SOV 为-1.9 毫米或-0.5 毫米,STJ 为-0.1 毫米或 1.9 毫米。半自动方法的组内相关系数为 0.79-0.96(观察者内)和 0.75-0.92(观察者间)。使用超声心动图标准的半自动测量法进行 THV 尺寸测量比使用 MDCT 标准的 MDCT 测量法得出的尺寸更大(p < 0.0001),但如果两者均使用 MDCT 标准,则结果相当(p > 0.05)。新型自动化 3D-TEE 软件可以高度准确地对主动脉根部进行建模和定量。半自动方法的测量值与相应的 MDCT 非常接近且具有良好的相关性,因此,使用此模型化 3D-TEE 测量法进行 THV 尺寸测量应采用推荐的 MDCT 标准,而不是超声心动图标准。全自动 3D-TEE 分段尚未成熟。(经食管 3 维超声心动图半自动评估主动脉根部[SMARE],NCT02724709)。