Suppr超能文献

达芬奇 Xi 与达芬奇 Si 手术系统在 Roux-En-Y 胃旁路手术中的比较。

A comparison of the da Vinci Xi vs. the da Vinci Si Surgical System for Roux-En-Y gastric bypass.

机构信息

Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Geneva Hospitals and School of Medicine, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Aug;404(5):615-620. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01803-z. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The da Vinci Surgical System family remains the most widely used surgical robotic system for laparoscopy. Data about gastric bypass surgery with the Xi Surgical System are not available yet. We compared Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery performed at our institution with the da Vinci Xi and the da Vinci Si Surgical System.

METHODS

All robotic gastric bypass procedures performed between January 2013 and September 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Patient demographics and operative and postoperative outcomes up to 30 days were compared for the da Vinci Xi and Si Surgical System. Robotic costs per procedure were modeled including posts for a standard set of robotic instruments, capital investment, and yearly maintenance.

RESULTS

One-hundred forty-four Xi Surgical System and 195 Si Surgical System procedures were identified. Mean age (p = 0.9), gender distribution (p = 0.8), BMI (p = 0.6), and ASA scores (p > 0.5) were similar in both cohorts. Operating room times were similar in both groups (219.4 ± 58.8 vs. 227.4 ± 60.5 min for Xi vs. Si, p = 0.22). Docking times were significantly longer with the Xi compared with the Si Surgical System (9 ± 4.8 vs. 5.8 ± 4 min, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in incidence of minor (13.9 vs. 10.3%, p = 0.3) and major complications (5.6 vs. 5.1%, p = 1 for Xi vs. Si). Costs were higher for the Xi Surgical System caused by higher capital investment and yearly maintenance.

CONCLUSIONS

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery can be safely performed with the Xi Surgical System, while drawbacks include longer docking times and higher costs.

摘要

目的

达芬奇手术系统家族仍然是腹腔镜手术中使用最广泛的手术机器人系统。目前还没有关于 Xi 手术系统进行胃旁路手术的数据。我们比较了我院使用达芬奇 Xi 和 Si 手术系统进行的 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术。

方法

回顾性分析 2013 年 1 月至 2016 年 9 月期间所有机器人胃旁路手术。比较达芬奇 Xi 和 Si 手术系统的患者人口统计学和手术及术后 30 天内的结果。对每个手术的机器人成本进行建模,包括标准一套机器人器械的支架、资本投资和年度维护。

结果

共确定了 144 例 Xi 手术系统和 195 例 Si 手术系统手术。两组患者的平均年龄(p=0.9)、性别分布(p=0.8)、BMI(p=0.6)和 ASA 评分(p>0.5)相似。两组的手术室时间相似(Xi 组为 219.4±58.8 分钟,Si 组为 227.4±60.5 分钟,p=0.22)。Xi 组的对接时间明显长于 Si 手术系统(9±4.8 分钟与 5.8±4 分钟,p<0.0001)。Xi 组和 Si 组 minor(13.9%与 10.3%,p=0.3)和 major(5.6%与 5.1%,p=1)并发症的发生率没有差异。由于较高的资本投资和年度维护,Xi 手术系统的成本更高。

结论

Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术可以安全地使用 Xi 手术系统进行,但其缺点包括对接时间较长和成本较高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验