Naik Seema, Riches Marcie, Hari Parameswaran, Kim Soyoung, Chen Min, Bachier Carlos, Shaughnessy Paul, Hill Joshua, Ljungman Per, Battiwalla Minoo, Chhabra Saurabh, Daly Andrew, Storek Jan, Ustun Celalettin, Diaz Miguel Angel, Cerny Jan, Beitinjaneh Amer, Yared Jean, Brown Valerie, Page Kristin, Dahi Parastoo B, Ganguly Siddhartha, Seo Sachiko, Chao Nelson, Freytes Cesar O, Saad Ayman, Savani Bipin N, Woo Ahn Kwang, Boeckh Michael, Heslop Helen E, Lazarus Hillard M, Auletta Jeffery J, Kamble Rammurti T
Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North California.
Transpl Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;21(5):e13145. doi: 10.1111/tid.13145. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). Although most PTLD is EBV-positive (EBV ), EBV-negative (EBV ) PTLD is reported, yet its incidence and clinical impact remain largely undefined. Furthermore, factors at the time of transplant impacting survival following PTLD are not well described.
Between 2002 and 2014, 432 cases of PTLD following alloHCT were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). After exclusions, 267 cases (EBV = 222, 83%; EBV = 45, 17%) were analyzed.
Two hundred and eight patients (78%) received in vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) with either anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or alemtuzumab. Incidence of PTLD was highest using umbilical cord donors (UCB, 1.60%) and lowest using matched related donors (MRD, 0.40%). Clinical features and histology did not significantly differ among EBV or EBV PTLD cases except that absolute lymphocyte count recovery was slower, and CMV reactivation was later in EBV PTLD [EBV 32 (5-95) days versus EBV 47 (10-70) days, P = .016]. There was no impact on survival by EBV status in multivariable analysis [EBV RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.94-2.15, P = .097].
There is no difference in survival outcomes for patients with EBV or EBV PTLD occurring following alloHCT and 1-year survival is poor. Features of conditioning and use of serotherapy remain important.
移植后淋巴细胞增殖性疾病(PTLD)与异基因造血细胞移植(alloHCT)后的显著发病率和死亡率相关。尽管大多数PTLD是EBV阳性(EBV⁺),但也有EBV阴性(EBV⁻)PTLD的报道,但其发病率和临床影响仍大多未明。此外,移植时影响PTLD后生存的因素也未得到充分描述。
2002年至2014年期间,国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心(CIBMTR)报告了432例alloHCT后的PTLD病例。排除后,分析了267例病例(EBV⁺ = 222例,83%;EBV⁻ = 45例,17%)。
208例患者(78%)接受了使用抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)或阿仑单抗的体内T细胞清除(TCD)。使用脐带血供体(UCB)时PTLD的发病率最高(1.60%),使用匹配的相关供体(MRD)时最低(0.40%)。EBV⁺或EBV⁻PTLD病例的临床特征和组织学无显著差异,只是EBV⁻PTLD中绝对淋巴细胞计数恢复较慢,巨细胞病毒(CMV)重新激活较晚[EBV⁺为32(5 - 95)天,而EBV⁻为47(10 - 70)天,P = 0.016]。多变量分析中EBV状态对生存无影响[EBV⁺风险比(RR)为1.42,95%置信区间(CI)为0.94 - 2.15,P = 0.097]。
alloHCT后发生EBV⁺或EBV⁻PTLD的患者生存结局无差异,1年生存率较低。预处理特征和血清疗法的使用仍然很重要。