Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Division of Periodontology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Surgery and Integrated Clinic, Division of Periodontology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2019 Sep;27:388-395. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
Residual pockets represent a risk factor for periodontal disease progression. Diabetes Mellitus (DM) may impair prognosis after cause-related therapy, mainly due to the chronic hyperglycemia that negatively influences tissue repair. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) with curcumin (CUR) solution (100 mg/L) and LED irradiation (465-485 nm), as an adjunctive therapy to scaling and root planing (SRP), in the treatment of residual pockets in type 2 diabetic patients.
Individuals with type 2 DM and chronic periodontitis presenting at least one residual pocket per quadrant were selected (n = 25). In each patient, all residual pockets with probing depth (PD) ≥5 mm and bleeding on probing (BOP) were allocated to receive, according to quadrant: 1) SRP (SRP group); 2) SRP and irrigation with CUR solution (100 mg/L) (CUR group); 3) SRP and LED irradiation (InGaN, 465-485 nm, 0.78 cm², 78 mW, 100 mW/cm², 60 s) (LED group); 4) SRP, irrigation with CUR solution (100 mg/L), one minute of pre-irradiation, and LED irradiation (InGaN, 465-485 nm, 60 s) (aPDT group). Clinical parameters of PD, gingival recession (GR), clinical attachment level (CAL), BOP and visible plaque index (PI) were evaluated at baseline, three and six months post-therapies. Differences between the examination periods in each group were analyzed by Friedman's test for non-parametric data, while parametric data were submitted to analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA), followed by Tukey's test. Intergroup comparisons were performed by Kruskal-Wallis test.
In an intergroup comparison, the mean values for PD, GR, CAL, BOP and PI were not different at baseline, three and six months (p > 0.05). The intragroup comparison evidenced reduction in PD and BOP in all treatment groups at three and six months (p < 0.05). Significant CAL gain was notable only for the aPDT and LED groups at three months in comparison to baseline data (p < 0.05).
Treatment of residual pockets in patients with type 2 DM through association of SRP with aPDT (CUR solution 100 mg/L and LED irradiation) or LED irradiation may yield short-term (three months) clinical benefits regarding CAL gain.
残留的牙周袋是牙周病进展的一个危险因素。糖尿病(DM)可能会在相关治疗后影响预后,主要是由于慢性高血糖会对组织修复产生负面影响。本研究评估了 100mg/L 姜黄素(CUR)溶液联合光动力疗法(aPDT)作为辅助治疗,在治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的牙周袋方面的临床疗效。
选择每个象限至少有一个牙周袋的 2 型糖尿病伴慢性牙周炎患者(n=25)。在每位患者中,所有 PD≥5mm 和探诊出血(BOP)的牙周袋均根据象限分配以下治疗:1)SRP(SRP 组);2)SRP 联合 CUR 溶液(100mg/L)冲洗(CUR 组);3)SRP 联合 LED 照射(InGaN,465-485nm,0.78cm²,78mW,100mW/cm²,60s)(LED 组);4)SRP、CUR 溶液(100mg/L)冲洗、预照射 1 分钟、LED 照射(InGaN,465-485nm,60s)(aPDT 组)。治疗后 3 个月和 6 个月分别检测 PD、牙龈退缩(GR)、临床附着水平(CAL)、BOP 和可视菌斑指数(PI)等临床参数。非参数数据采用 Friedman 检验分析组间各检查期的差异,而参数数据采用单因素方差分析(One-way ANOVA),然后采用 Tukey 检验。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行组间比较。
组间比较显示,各治疗组在基线、3 个月和 6 个月时 PD、GR、CAL、BOP 和 PI 的平均值无差异(p>0.05)。组内比较显示,所有治疗组在 3 个月和 6 个月时 PD 和 BOP 均降低(p<0.05)。与基线数据相比,仅 aPDT 和 LED 组在 3 个月时 CAL 有显著增加(p<0.05)。
SRP 联合 aPDT(100mg/L CUR 溶液和 LED 照射)或 LED 照射治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的牙周袋,可在短期内(3 个月)获得 CAL 增加的临床获益。