Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory for ECO-efficient Recycled Materials, School of Environment and Energy, Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School, Guangdong, China, 518055; Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada.
Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 10;690:620-628. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
For determining setback distances considering multiple air pollutants, a comprehensive study was conducted to simulate the atmospheric dispersion of odour, ammonia (NH), hydrogen sulfide (HS), and respirable dust using an US EPA air dispersion model AERMOD for a commercial dairy, broiler, and cage-layer barn in the Canadian Prairies. The simulation was conducted using five years of meteorological data. Setback distances were determined with the input of varying monthly emission rates of all four air pollutants and odour impact criteria specifically developed for all three odour sources. Results showed the layer barn had the greatest odour impact area (maximum 3023 m for an annual average odour concentration of 0.01 OU m) followed by the broiler and dairy barns. Due to the prevailing south wind for all three barns, odour traveled farthest in the north. Using the suggested odour impact criteria by the Government of Saskatchewan defined for all odour sources, maximum setback distances were decreasing from 1941 to 641 m for the layer barn and from 980 to 320 m for the broiler barn along with the increasing of odour concentration (OC) thresholds (1-6 OU m), all in the north direction. While for the dairy barn, setback distances were determined only under an OC limit of 1 OU m; maximum 205 m in the north and minimum 171 m in the south. Using the newly developed odour impact criteria specifically for the three odour sources, maximum setback distance of 558 m in the north was determined for the layer barn under an odour threshold of 9 OU m. Additionally, the results suggest the use of odour impact criteria for determining setback distance rather than using gas/respirable threshold limits set in ambient air quality standards as the former always requires much greater setback distances than the latter.
为了确定考虑多种空气污染物的后退距离,对商业奶牛场、肉鸡场和蛋鸡舍进行了一项综合研究,使用美国环保署的空气扩散模型 AERMOD 模拟恶臭、氨(NH)、硫化氢(HS)和可吸入粉尘的大气扩散。该模拟使用了五年的气象数据。通过输入四种空气污染物的月排放量变化和专为三种恶臭源开发的恶臭影响标准,确定了后退距离。结果表明,蛋鸡舍的恶臭影响面积最大(年平均恶臭浓度为 0.01 OU m 时最大为 3023 m),其次是肉鸡舍和奶牛场。由于这三个畜舍都盛行南风,恶臭在北方传播最远。使用萨斯喀彻温省政府为所有恶臭源定义的建议恶臭影响标准,对于蛋鸡舍,最大后退距离从 1941 米减少到 641 米,对于肉鸡舍,最大后退距离从 980 米减少到 320 米,同时恶臭浓度(OC)阈值(1-6 OU m)增加,所有这些都在北方。对于奶牛场,仅在 OC 限值为 1 OU m 时确定后退距离;在北方最大为 205 m,在南方最小为 171 m。对于蛋鸡舍,在恶臭阈值为 9 OU m 下,使用专门为这三种恶臭源开发的新恶臭影响标准,确定最大后退距离为 558 m。此外,结果表明,使用恶臭影响标准确定后退距离比使用环境空气质量标准中规定的气体/可吸入物阈值限制更合理,因为前者通常需要比后者更大的后退距离。