Suppr超能文献

腹部X光片初步临床评估影像题库项目

Abdominal radiograph preliminary clinical evaluation image test bank project.

作者信息

Bradbury C, Britton I, Lille K, Wright-White H

机构信息

Imaging Department, University Hospital of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.

School of Nursing & Midwifery, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Radiography (Lond). 2019 Aug;25(3):250-254. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Literature documenting preliminary clinical evaluation (PCE) commonly focuses on the evaluation of musculoskeletal radiographs. Despite this, the professional body suggest that a diagnostic radiographer should be able to provide a PCE for any radiograph.

METHODS

An image bank of 30 abdominal radiographs was designed comprising of 17 abnormal cases with a range of pathologies which one could expect to encounter in the emergency department (ED). Participants' were asked to select one of four taxonomies to represent their PCE for each radiograph. Participants' answers were compared to a gold standard PCE taxonomy based on the radiological report. Inferential statistics were applied to assess for any significant different in accuracy between NHS pay bands of the participants.

RESULTS

On average participants selected an abdominal radiograph PCE taxonomy with a sensitivity of 75.2% and a specificity of 75.7%. Whilst band 7 radiographers selected the most accurate abdominal radiograph PCE and had the highest area under curve (AUC), no significant difference was found in the PCE categorisation of abdominal radiographs by radiographers of all pay bands.

CONCLUSION

Participants' have shown good sensitivity in recognising prominent findings on abdominal radiographs. This sensitivity is however reduced when assessing less obvious radiographic appearances, illustrating areas where additional training would be beneficial. The study provides evidence towards the consideration of an expansion of current practice regarding the implementation of a scheme of abdominal radiograph PCE. Further research with a larger cohort of participants' and a lower abnormal case prevalence would be beneficial to the limited research base.

摘要

引言

记录初步临床评估(PCE)的文献通常侧重于肌肉骨骼X光片的评估。尽管如此,专业机构建议诊断放射技师应该能够为任何X光片提供PCE。

方法

设计了一个包含30张腹部X光片的图像库,其中包括17例异常病例,涵盖了一系列在急诊科可能遇到的病症。要求参与者从四种分类法中选择一种来代表他们对每张X光片的PCE。将参与者的答案与基于放射学报告的金标准PCE分类法进行比较。应用推断统计来评估参与者的国民保健服务薪酬等级在准确性上是否存在任何显著差异。

结果

参与者平均选择的腹部X光片PCE分类法的敏感度为75.2%,特异度为75.7%。虽然7级放射技师选择的腹部X光片PCE最准确,曲线下面积(AUC)最高,但所有薪酬等级的放射技师在腹部X光片的PCE分类方面未发现显著差异。

结论

参与者在识别腹部X光片上的显著发现方面表现出良好的敏感度。然而,在评估不太明显的X光表现时,这种敏感度会降低,这说明了在哪些领域进行额外培训将是有益处。该研究为考虑扩大当前关于实施腹部X光片PCE方案的实践提供了证据。对更多参与者群体和更低异常病例患病率进行进一步研究将有助于充实有限的研究基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验