Trephination versus wide excision for the treatment of pediatric pilonidal disease.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of trephination compared to wide excision in children undergoing initial surgical treatment of pilonidal disease.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing initial pilonidal excision between September 2017 and September 2018. Operations were categorized as either trephination or wide excision via an open or closed-wound technique. Outcomes were evaluated and data analyzed by chi-squared and one-way ANOVA tests.

RESULTS

One-hundred and five patients were identified, with a mean follow-up of 4.6 months. Trephination was performed in 57% of patients, and of the remaining patients undergoing wide excision, 62% of wounds were left open. There were no demographic differences among the three groups. Compared to both the open and closed techniques, trephination was associated with fewer wound complications (17% vs 29% vs 3%, respectively, p = 0.006), and postoperative visits (4.4 vs 2.4 vs 1.4, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no difference in recurrence rates among groups.

CONCLUSION

Trephination for pilonidal disease in pediatric patients is associated with a lower wound complication rate and fewer postoperative visits compared to wide excision. Recurrence rates are similar among the various surgical methods. Further prospective study would be useful to describe long-term outcomes of patients undergoing trephination for pilonidal disease.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (retrospective comparative).