• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

四种不同手术方法治疗骶尾部藏毛窦的对比分析。

A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.

机构信息

İstanbul Gelişim University Health Sciences Colleges, Health Administration Department, İstanbul, Turkey.

Lokman Hekim University Hospital, General Surgery Department, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2019 Oct;42(10):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.011
PMID:30685149
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Although many surgical methods have been described for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus treatment, the best option is still controversial. We aimed to compare postoperative outcomes of these different methods in terms of advantages and disadvantages.

METHODS

The records of 320 patients undergone surgery for primary or recurrent pilonidal sinus between May 2013 and May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographical data, pre operative stories, wound site infection, seroma development, wound dehiscence, time of healing, duration of return to work, and if there is any recurrence of 303 patients included in the study were recorded. Upon wide local excision, the first surgeon performed marsupialisation and the lay open technique, second surgeon performed vertical excision and primary closure, third surgeon performed Limberg flap transposition and fourth surgeon performed Karydakis' flap transposition.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the patients in terms of demographical characteristics. The duration of surgery was statistically significantly higher in primary closure method (p = 0.001). The mean duration of return-to-work was statistically significantly lower in primary closure method (p = 0.002). In primary closure method, the recurrence rate was found to be statistically significantly higher than the other methods (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

We do not suggest the use of primary closure method in treatment of pilonidal sinus. Because of lower rates of recurrence and shorter durations of return to work, the Karydakis and Limberg methods are seen as safer methods when compared to lay-open and marsupialization method.

摘要

目的

虽然已经有许多手术方法被用于治疗藏毛窦,但哪种方法最优仍存在争议。本研究旨在对比不同手术方法的术后结果,分析其优缺点。

方法

回顾性分析 2013 年 5 月至 2017 年 5 月间 320 例接受原发性或复发性藏毛窦手术患者的记录。记录患者的人口统计学数据、术前情况、伤口部位感染、血清肿发展、伤口裂开、愈合时间、重返工作岗位时间,以及 303 例研究对象中是否有任何复发情况。第一主刀医生在广泛切除后分别采用了袋形缝合术和敞开引流术、第二主刀医生采用了垂直切除术和一期缝合术、第三主刀医生采用了 Limberg 皮瓣转移术、第四主刀医生采用了 Karydakis 皮瓣转移术。

结果

患者的人口统计学特征无显著差异。一期缝合术的手术时间明显较长(p=0.001)。一期缝合术的重返工作岗位时间明显较短(p=0.002)。一期缝合术的复发率明显高于其他方法(p=0.009)。

结论

我们不建议采用一期缝合术治疗藏毛窦。与敞开引流术和袋形缝合术相比,Karydakis 和 Limberg 术式的复发率更低,重返工作岗位的时间更短,因此被视为更安全的方法。

相似文献

1
A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.四种不同手术方法治疗骶尾部藏毛窦的对比分析。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Oct;42(10):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
2
How to repair the surgical defect after excision of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: a dilemma.如何修复骶尾部藏毛窦切除术后的手术缺损:一个两难问题。
J Wound Care. 2014 Dec;23(12):630-3. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.12.630.
3
Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study.改良 Karydakis 皮瓣与改良 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦病的短期疗效比较:一项随机对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7.
4
The effects of skin closure by using mattress sutures or intracutaneous absorbable sutures after the Karydakis flap surgery because of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. A comparative analysis.骶尾部藏毛窦行卡里达基斯皮瓣手术后使用褥式缝合或皮内可吸收缝合进行皮肤闭合的效果。一项对比分析。
Ann Ital Chir. 2019;90:474-479.
5
Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery.藏毛窦手术中三种手术技术的比较
Prague Med Rep. 2018;119(4):148-155. doi: 10.14712/23362936.2019.2.
6
Primary wound closure with a Limberg flap vs. secondary wound healing after excision of a pilonidal sinus: a multicentre randomised controlled study.藏毛窦切除术后Limberg皮瓣一期伤口闭合与二期伤口愈合的多中心随机对照研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;30(1):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2057-x. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
7
Primary closure or rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for the management of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.原发骶尾部藏毛窦行一期缝合或菱形切除加 Limberg 皮瓣转移术治疗的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02473.x.
8
Comparison of Primary Midline Closure, Limberg Flap, and Karydakis Flap Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery.原发性中线缝合术、Limberg 皮瓣术和 Karydakis 皮瓣术在肛门窦切开术中的比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Dec 11;24:8959-8963. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913248.
9
Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease.Limberg皮瓣和Karydakis皮瓣在复发性藏毛窦疾病中的疗效
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 May;70(5):350-5. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(05)08. Epub 2015 May 1.
10
Surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus with the Limberg transposition flap.采用林贝格移位皮瓣手术治疗骶尾部藏毛窦。
Surgery. 2003 Nov;134(5):745-9. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(03)00163-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Techniques for Pilonidal Sinus: A Turkish Retrospective Study.藏毛窦手术技术的比较结果:一项土耳其回顾性研究
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Feb 25;31:e947466. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947466.
2
The Presence of Pilonidal Sinus Infection Before Surgery Versus Other Factors as Predictors of Sinus Recurrence After Surgical Excision: A Retrospective Study.术前藏毛窦感染与其他因素作为手术切除后窦道复发预测因素的比较:一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2025 Jan 7;17(1):e77080. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77080. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Advancements and Innovations in the Surgical Management of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus: A Comprehensive Review.
骶尾部藏毛窦手术治疗的进展与创新:综述
Cureus. 2024 May 26;16(5):e61141. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61141. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Pilonidal sinus: an overview of historical and current management modalities.藏毛窦:历史和当前治疗方式概述。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):803-810. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01799-2. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
5
Non-operative management of umbilical pilonidal sinus: One more step towards ideal therapy.非手术治疗脐部藏毛窦:向理想治疗更进一步。
Int Wound J. 2023 Sep;20(7):2505-2510. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14111. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
6
Pilonidal sinus disease recurrence at a tertiary care center in Riyadh.利雅得一家三级护理中心的藏毛窦疾病复发情况。
Ann Saudi Med. 2021 May-Jun;41(3):179-185. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2021.179. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
7
Comparative analysis on the effect of Z-plasty versus conventional simple excision for the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: A retrospective randomised clinical study.Z 成形术与传统单纯切除术治疗骶尾部藏毛窦的疗效对比分析:一项回顾性随机临床研究。
Int Wound J. 2020 Jun;17(3):555-561. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13315. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
8
D-shape asymmetric excision in recurrent pilonidalis disease: an analytic longitudinal long-term evaluation.复发性藏毛窦疾病的D形不对称切除术:一项分析性纵向长期评估
Updates Surg. 2019 Dec;71(4):723-727. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00644-1. Epub 2019 Mar 18.