Suppr超能文献

意义在自由观看真实世界场景时的注意力引导中的作用。

The role of meaning in attentional guidance during free viewing of real-world scenes.

作者信息

Peacock Candace E, Hayes Taylor R, Henderson John M

机构信息

Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, United States of America; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, United States of America.

Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, United States of America.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102889. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102889. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

Abstract

In real-world vision, humans prioritize the most relevant visual information at the expense of other information via attentional selection. The current study sought to understand the role of semantic features and image features on attentional selection during free viewing of real-world scenes. We compared the ability of meaning maps generated from ratings of isolated, context-free image patches and saliency maps generated from the Graph-Based Visual Saliency model to predict the spatial distribution of attention in scenes as measured by eye movements. Additionally, we introduce new contextualized meaning maps in which scene patches were rated based upon how informative or recognizable they were in the context of the scene from which they derived. We found that both context-free and contextualized meaning explained significantly more of the overall variance in the spatial distribution of attention than image salience. Furthermore, meaning explained early attention to a significantly greater extent than image salience, contrary to predictions of the 'saliency first' hypothesis. Finally, both context-free and contextualized meaning predicted attention equivalently. These results support theories in which meaning plays a dominant role in attentional guidance during free viewing of real-world scenes.

摘要

在现实世界的视觉中,人类通过注意力选择优先处理最相关的视觉信息,而忽略其他信息。当前的研究旨在了解语义特征和图像特征在自由观看现实世界场景时对注意力选择的作用。我们比较了从孤立的、无上下文的图像块评分生成的意义地图和基于图的视觉显著性模型生成的显著性地图预测由眼动测量的场景中注意力空间分布的能力。此外,我们引入了新的情境化意义地图,其中场景块是根据它们在所属场景中的信息性或可识别性进行评分的。我们发现,无上下文和情境化的意义比图像显著性能显著解释更多注意力空间分布的总体方差。此外,与“显著性优先”假设的预测相反,意义比图像显著性能在更大程度上解释早期注意力。最后,无上下文和情境化的意义对注意力的预测效果相当。这些结果支持了这样的理论,即在自由观看现实世界场景时,意义在注意力引导中起主导作用。

相似文献

1
The role of meaning in attentional guidance during free viewing of real-world scenes.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102889. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102889. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
2
Meaning guides attention during scene viewing, even when it is irrelevant.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):20-34. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1607-7.
3
Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description.
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 10;8(1):13504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31894-5.
5
Rapid Extraction of the Spatial Distribution of Physical Saliency and Semantic Informativeness from Natural Scenes in the Human Brain.
J Neurosci. 2022 Jan 5;42(1):97-108. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0602-21.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
6
Semantic guidance of eye movements in real-world scenes.
Vision Res. 2011 May 25;51(10):1192-205. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
7
Center bias outperforms image salience but not semantics in accounting for attention during scene viewing.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jun;82(3):985-994. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01849-7.
8
Searching for meaning: Local scene semantics guide attention during natural visual search in scenes.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):632-648. doi: 10.1177/17470218221101334. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
9
The roles of scene gist and spatial dependency among objects in the semantic guidance of attention in real-world scenes.
Vision Res. 2014 Dec;105:10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.019. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
10
Meaning and Attentional Guidance in Scenes: A Review of the Meaning Map Approach.
Vision (Basel). 2019 May 10;3(2):19. doi: 10.3390/vision3020019.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of local meaning in infants' fixations of natural scenes.
Infancy. 2024 Mar-Apr;29(2):284-298. doi: 10.1111/infa.12582. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
2
Speakers prioritise affordance-based object semantics in scene descriptions.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2023;38(8):1045-1067. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2190136. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
3
Objects are selected for attention based upon meaning during passive scene viewing.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1874-1886. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02286-2. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
4
Visual attention during seeing for speaking in healthy aging.
Psychol Aging. 2023 Feb;38(1):49-66. doi: 10.1037/pag0000718. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
5
Reduced social attention in autism is magnified by perceptual load in naturalistic environments.
Autism Res. 2022 Dec;15(12):2310-2323. doi: 10.1002/aur.2829. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
6
Searching for meaning: Local scene semantics guide attention during natural visual search in scenes.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):632-648. doi: 10.1177/17470218221101334. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
7
Look at what I can do: Object affordances guide visual attention while speakers describe potential actions.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jul;84(5):1583-1610. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02467-6. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
9
Rapid Extraction of the Spatial Distribution of Physical Saliency and Semantic Informativeness from Natural Scenes in the Human Brain.
J Neurosci. 2022 Jan 5;42(1):97-108. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0602-21.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Meaning-based guidance of attention in scenes as revealed by meaning maps.
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;1(10):743-747. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0208-0. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
2
Is there a shape to the attention spotlight? Computing saliency over proto-objects predicts fixations during scene viewing.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Jan;45(1):139-154. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000593.
3
Meaning guides attention during scene viewing, even when it is irrelevant.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):20-34. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1607-7.
4
Meaning Guides Attention during Real-World Scene Description.
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 10;8(1):13504. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31894-5.
6
What Do Different Evaluation Metrics Tell Us About Saliency Models?
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2019 Mar;41(3):740-757. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2815601. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
7
Salient object changes influence overt attentional prioritization and object-based targeting in natural scenes.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 21;12(2):e0172132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172132. eCollection 2017.
8
Gaze Control as Prediction.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jan;21(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
9
Visual Saliency Prediction and Evaluation across Different Perceptual Tasks.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0138053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138053. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验