Maneschi Francesco, Perrone Seila, Di Lucia Alessandra, Ianiri Palmiero
Gynecologic and Obstetrics Unit, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital, Roma, Italy.
Department of Gynecological Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;40(1):40-45. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1603210. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
The aim of this study was to report the association between shock severity, laboratory parameters and treatment in patients with severe post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) requiring the transfusion of ≥4 blood unit. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) conservative therapy and (2) emergency post-partum hysterectomy. The aggressive decision was always shared by two consultants. Out of 26,094 deliveries, severe PPH occurred in 34 (0.13%) women, emergency post-partum hysterectomy was required in 13 (0.05%), while 21 (0.08%) were treated conservatively. Grade of shock, shock index (SI) and the number of blood units transfused were significantly higher in the hysterectomy group. No statistically significant difference among the two groups was observed for haemoglobin and coagulation results. The severity of shock was associated with the therapeutic choice in the treatment of severe PPH. Therefore, grade of shock and SI should be taken into consideration by the leading obstetrician in the decision making process toward the emergency hysterectomy.Impact Statement Primary post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal death in developing and industrialised countries. Emergency post-partum hysterectomy is considered a life-saving procedure performed when the women is experiencing a life-threatening haemorrhage. Therapeutic dichotomy between conservative and aggressive approach in severe PPH has not been defined, in particular emergency post-partum hysterectomy timing. Shock index (SI) has been proposed as an indicator of adverse maternal outcome. However, the association between shock parameters and advanced treatment modalities has not yet been reported. In our study, grade of shock, SI and the number of blood units transfused were significantly higher in the patients which needed hysterectomy suggesting that it may have a role in the decision making among conservative and aggressive treatment. No statistically significant difference was observed for haemoglobin and coagulation results.? Grade of shock and SI should be taken into consideration in the decision making process toward the emergency hysterectomy in severe PPH. The choice between conservative and aggressive treatment should be based on hemodynamic parameters that may represent, in more accurate way, the severity of blood loss. Nevertheless, these data need further confirmation in a larger study.
本研究旨在报告重度产后出血(PPH)且需要输注≥4个血单位的患者中,休克严重程度、实验室参数与治疗之间的关联。患者被分为两组:(1)保守治疗组和(2)紧急产后子宫切除术组。激进的决策始终由两位会诊医生共同做出。在26,094例分娩中,34例(0.13%)女性发生了重度PPH,其中13例(0.05%)需要紧急产后子宫切除术,而21例(0.08%)接受了保守治疗。子宫切除术组的休克分级、休克指数(SI)和输注的血单位数量显著更高。两组之间的血红蛋白和凝血结果未观察到统计学上的显著差异。休克严重程度与重度PPH治疗中的治疗选择相关。因此,在决定是否进行紧急子宫切除术时,主刀产科医生应考虑休克分级和SI。
原发性产后出血(PPH)是发展中国家和工业化国家孕产妇死亡的主要原因。紧急产后子宫切除术被认为是在女性面临危及生命的出血时实施的挽救生命的手术。重度PPH中保守和激进方法之间的治疗二分法尚未明确,尤其是紧急产后子宫切除术的时机。休克指数(SI)已被提议作为孕产妇不良结局的指标。然而,休克参数与先进治疗方式之间的关联尚未见报道。在我们的研究中,需要子宫切除术的患者的休克分级、SI和输注的血单位数量显著更高,这表明其可能在保守和激进治疗的决策中起作用。血红蛋白和凝血结果未观察到统计学上的显著差异。在重度PPH的紧急子宫切除术决策过程中应考虑休克分级和SI。保守和激进治疗之间的选择应基于血流动力学参数,这些参数可能更准确地反映失血的严重程度。然而,这些数据需要在更大规模的研究中进一步证实。