Suppr超能文献

便携式脉搏血氧仪监测青紫型先天性心脏病低氧血症婴儿的准确性。

Accuracy of a portable pulse oximeter in monitoring hypoxemic infants with cyanotic heart disease.

作者信息

Harris Bronwyn U, Stewart Sarah, Verma Archana, Hoen Helena, Stein Mary Lyn, Wright Gail, Ramamoorthy Chandra

机构信息

Departments of Pediatrics (Cardiology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Departments of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

出版信息

Cardiol Young. 2019 Aug;29(8):1025-1029. doi: 10.1017/S1047951119001355. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Infants with single ventricle physiology have arterial oxygen saturations between 75 and 85%. Home monitoring with daily pulse oximetry is associated with improved interstage survival. They are typically sent home with expensive, bulky, hospital-grade pulse oximeters. This study evaluates the accuracy of both the currently used Masimo LNCS and a relatively inexpensive, portable, and equipped with Bluetooth technology study device, by comparing with the gold standard co-oximeter.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

SETTING

Single institution, paediatric cardiac critical care unit, and neonatal ICU.

INTERVENTIONS

none.

PATIENTS

Twenty-four infants under 12 months of age with baseline oxygen saturation less than 90% due to cyanotic CHD.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Pulse oximetry with WristOx2 3150 with infant sensors 8008 J (study device) and Masimo LCNS saturation sensor connected to a Philips monitor (hospital device) were measured simultaneously and compared to arterial oxy-haemoglobin saturation measured by co-oximetry. Statistical analysis evaluated the performances of each and compared to co-oximetry with Schuirmann's TOST equivalence tests, with equivalence defined as an absolute difference of 5% saturation or less. Neither the study nor the hospital device met the predefined standard for equivalence when compared with co-oximetry. The study device reading was on average 4.0% higher than the co-oximeter, failing to show statistical equivalence (p = 0.16). The hospital device was 7.4% higher than the co-oximeter and also did not meet the predefined standard for equivalence (p = 0.97).

CONCLUSION

Both devices tended to overestimate oxygen saturation in this patient population when compared to the gold standard, co-oximetry. The study device is at least as accurate as the hospital device and offers the advantage of being more portable with Bluetooth technology that allows reliable, efficient data transmission. Currently FDA-approved, smaller portable pulse oximeters can be considered for use in home monitoring programmes.

摘要

目的

患有单心室生理状况的婴儿动脉血氧饱和度在75%至85%之间。每日使用脉搏血氧仪进行家庭监测与改善分期生存相关。他们通常会带着昂贵、笨重的医院级脉搏血氧仪回家。本研究通过与金标准血气分析仪比较,评估了目前使用的Masimo LNCS以及一种相对便宜、便携且配备蓝牙技术的研究设备的准确性。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

单一机构,儿科心脏重症监护病房和新生儿重症监护病房。

干预措施

无。

患者

24名12个月以下因青紫型先天性心脏病导致基线血氧饱和度低于90%的婴儿。

测量与结果

同时测量连接到飞利浦监护仪(医院设备)的带有婴儿传感器8008 J的WristOx2 3150(研究设备)和Masimo LCNS饱和度传感器的脉搏血氧饱和度,并与通过血气分析仪测量的动脉氧合血红蛋白饱和度进行比较。统计分析评估了每种设备的性能,并通过舒尔曼TOST等效性检验与血气分析仪进行比较,等效性定义为饱和度绝对差异为5%或更小。与血气分析仪相比,研究设备和医院设备均未达到预定义的等效标准。研究设备的读数平均比血气分析仪高4.0%,未显示出统计学等效性(p = 0.16)。医院设备比血气分析仪高7.4%,也未达到预定义的等效标准(p = 0.97)。

结论

与金标准血气分析仪相比,在该患者群体中,两种设备均倾向于高估血氧饱和度。研究设备至少与医院设备一样准确,并且具有更便携的优势,其蓝牙技术允许进行可靠、高效的数据传输。目前已获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准的更小的便携式脉搏血氧仪可考虑用于家庭监测项目。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验