Suppr超能文献

两种脉搏血氧仪在低动脉血红蛋白氧饱和度时的准确性。

Accuracy of two pulse oximeters at low arterial hemoglobin-oxygen saturation.

作者信息

Carter B G, Carlin J B, Tibballs J, Mead H, Hochmann M, Osborne A

机构信息

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1998 Jun;26(6):1128-33. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199806000-00040.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of two pulse oximeters in the measurement of arterial hemoglobin saturation in hypoxemic children.

DESIGN

Prospective, repeated-measures observational study.

SETTING

A 16-bed pediatric intensive care unit in a children's tertiary hospital.

PATIENTS

Sixty-six patients with arterial saturation of <90%.

INTERVENTIONS

Three arterial blood samples were taken from each subject during a 48-hr period. Pulse oximeter measurements of arterial saturation were compared with arterial saturation determined by cooximetry.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Arterial saturation was measured using one or both pulse oximeters (SpO2) and compared with the arterial hemoglobin saturation determined by cooximetry (SaO2). Sixty-two subjects were studied, using the Ohmeda pulse oximeter giving 185 data points (78 with saturations <75% [defined by the average of pulse oximeter and cooximeter]); 53 subjects were studied, using the Hewlett-Packard pulse oximeter yielding 155 data points (60 with saturations <75%). SpO2 ranged from 24% to 94%. Bias and precision of the Ohmeda pulse oximeter were -2.8% and 4.8% >75% and -0.8% and 8.0% <75%. Bias and precision of the Hewlett-Packard pulse oximeter were -0.5% and 5.1% >75% and 0.4% and 4.6% <75%. Intrapatient regression coefficient (r) for the differences between pulse oximeter and cooximeter was 0.58 for the Ohmeda and 0.59 for the Hewlett-Packard. Regression coefficients for predicting change in cooximeter value given a change in the Ohmeda pulse oximeter were 0.59 and 0.71 <75% and >75%, respectively. Similar coefficients for the Hewlett-Packard pulse oximeter were 0.50 and 0.70, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The performance of the Ohmeda pulse oximeter deteriorated below an SpO2 of 75%. The Hewlett-Packard pulse oximeter performed consistently above and below an SpO2 of 75%. The ability of both pulse oximeters to reliably predict change in SaO2 based on change in pulse oximetry was limited. We recommend measurement of PaO2 or SaO2 for important clinical decisions.

摘要

目的

评估两种脉搏血氧仪在测量低氧血症儿童动脉血红蛋白饱和度方面的性能。

设计

前瞻性、重复测量观察性研究。

地点

一家儿童三级医院的16张床位的儿科重症监护病房。

患者

66例动脉血氧饱和度<90%的患者。

干预措施

在48小时内从每个受试者采集三份动脉血样本。将脉搏血氧仪测量的动脉血氧饱和度与通过比色法测定的动脉血氧饱和度进行比较。

测量指标及主要结果

使用一台或两台脉搏血氧仪(SpO2)测量动脉血氧饱和度,并与通过比色法测定的动脉血红蛋白饱和度(SaO2)进行比较。对62名受试者进行了研究,使用Ohmeda脉搏血氧仪获得了185个数据点(78个饱和度<75%[由脉搏血氧仪和比色法的平均值定义]);对53名受试者进行了研究,使用惠普脉搏血氧仪获得了155个数据点(60个饱和度<75%)。SpO2范围为24%至94%。Ohmeda脉搏血氧仪在饱和度>75%时的偏差和精密度分别为-2.8%和4.8%,在饱和度<75%时为-0.8%和8.0%。惠普脉搏血氧仪在饱和度>75%时的偏差和精密度分别为-0.5%和5.1%,在饱和度<75%时为0.4%和4.6%。Ohmeda脉搏血氧仪与比色法之间差异的患者内回归系数(r)为0.58,惠普脉搏血氧仪为0.59。当Ohmeda脉搏血氧仪发生变化时,预测比色法值变化的回归系数在饱和度<75%和>75%时分别为0.59和0.71。惠普脉搏血氧仪的类似系数分别为0.50和0.70。

结论

Ohmeda脉搏血氧仪在SpO2低于75%时性能下降。惠普脉搏血氧仪在SpO2高于和低于75%时表现一致。两种脉搏血氧仪根据脉搏血氧测定法的变化可靠预测SaO2变化的能力有限。我们建议在做出重要临床决策时测量PaO2或SaO2。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验