Institute for Biomechanics, D-HEST, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Orthop Res. 2019 Nov;37(11):2337-2347. doi: 10.1002/jor.24416. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
Joint stability is a primary concern in total knee joint replacement. The GMK Sphere prosthesis was specifically designed to provide medial compartment anterior-posterior (A-P) stability, while permitting rotational freedom of the joint through a flat lateral tibial surface. The objective of this study was to establish the changes in joint kinematics introduced by the GMK Sphere prosthesis during gait activities in comparison to conventional posterior-stabilized (PS) fixed-bearing and ultra-congruent (UC) mobile-bearing geometries. The A-P translation and internal/external rotation of three cohorts, each with 10 good outcome subjects (2.9 ± 1.6 years postop), with a GMK Sphere, GMK PS or GMK UC implant were analysed throughout complete cycles of gait activities using dynamic videofluoroscopy. The GMK Sphere showed the smallest range of medial compartment A-P translation for level walking, downhill walking, and stair descent (3.6 ± 0.9 mm, 3.1 ± 0.8 mm, 3.9 ± 1.3 mm), followed by the GMK UC (5.7 ± 1.0 mm, 8.0 ± 1.7 mm, 8.7 ± 1.9 mm) and the GMK PS (10.3 ± 2.2 mm, 10.1 ± 2.6 mm, 11.6 ± 1.6 mm) geometries. The GMK Sphere exhibited the largest range of lateral compartment A-P translation (12.1 ± 2.2 mm), and the largest range of tibial internal/external rotation (13.2 ± 2.2°), both during stair descent. This study has shown that the GMK Sphere clearly restricts A-P motion of the medial condyle during gait activities while still allowing a large range of axial rotation. The additional comparison against the conventional GMK PS and UC geometries, not only demonstrates that implant geometry is a key factor in governing tibio-femoral kinematics, but also that the geometry itself probably plays a more dominant role for joint movement than the type of gait activity. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 37:2337-2347, 2019.
关节稳定性是全膝关节置换的主要关注点。GMK 球体假体专门设计用于提供内侧间室前后(A-P)稳定性,同时通过平坦的外侧胫骨表面允许关节的旋转自由度。本研究的目的是确定 GMK 球体假体在步态活动中引入的关节运动学变化,与传统的后稳定(PS)固定轴承和超共面(UC)活动轴承几何形状相比。使用动态荧光透视术分析了三组各有 10 名结果良好的受试者(术后 2.9 ± 1.6 年)的 A-P 平移和内/外旋转,每组均植入 GMK 球体、GMK PS 或 GMK UC 假体。GMK 球体在水平行走、下坡行走和下楼梯时显示出最小的内侧间室 A-P 平移范围(3.6 ± 0.9mm、3.1 ± 0.8mm、3.9 ± 1.3mm),其次是 GMK UC(5.7 ± 1.0mm、8.0 ± 1.7mm、8.7 ± 1.9mm)和 GMK PS(10.3 ± 2.2mm、10.1 ± 2.6mm、11.6 ± 1.6mm)几何形状。GMK 球体在下楼梯时显示出最大的外侧间室 A-P 平移范围(12.1 ± 2.2mm)和最大的胫骨内/外旋转范围(13.2 ± 2.2°)。本研究表明,GMK 球体在步态活动中明显限制了内侧髁的 A-P 运动,同时仍允许较大的轴向旋转范围。与传统的 GMK PS 和 UC 几何形状的额外比较不仅表明植入物几何形状是控制胫股关节运动学的关键因素,而且表明几何形状本身可能对关节运动的作用比步态活动的类型更为重要。 2019 年作者。 Wiley Periodicals,Inc. 代表骨科研究协会出版的《骨科研究杂志》。J Orthop Res 37:2337-2347,2019 年。