Shi Xiaowei, Yu Wenjing, Wang Tong, Shu Qi, Wang Chunjiu, Yang Xue, Liu Changxin, Guo Changqing
School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina.
Department of pediatrics, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(28):e16265. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016265.
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA), the most common type of osteoarthritis, is a chronic degenerative joint disease accompanied by pain and functional limitation for the elderly. The 2 nonpharmacologic approaches, electroacupuncture (EA) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), are considered beneficial in relieving KOA pain, however, the current conclusions are controversial. Furthermore, no direct or indirect meta-analyses between EA and TENS have been reported for the pain relief of KOA patients.
PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wan Fang will be systematically searched their inception to May 2018. Randomized controlled trials that compared the effect of EA and TENS on pain control in knee osteoarthritis will be included. The primary outcome was the knee pain levels, and secondary outcome was the comprehensive indicators. Risk of bias assessment of the included studies will be performed according to the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The pairwise and network meta-analysis will be performed by STATA 14.0 software.
This study is ongoing and will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.
This study will provide comprehensive evidence on the effects of EA and TENS for pain control in knee osteoarthritis.
CRD42018091826.
膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)是最常见的骨关节炎类型,是一种伴有疼痛和功能受限的慢性退行性关节疾病,多见于老年人。两种非药物治疗方法,即电针(EA)和经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS),被认为对缓解KOA疼痛有益,然而,目前的结论存在争议。此外,尚未有关于EA和TENS对KOA患者疼痛缓解效果的直接或间接荟萃分析报道。
将系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、维普资讯(VIP)、万方数据库,检索时间从建库至2018年5月。纳入比较EA和TENS对膝关节骨关节炎疼痛控制效果的随机对照试验。主要结局指标为膝关节疼痛程度,次要结局指标为综合指标。将根据Cochrane偏倚风险工具对纳入研究进行偏倚风险评估。将采用STATA 14.0软件进行成对和网状荟萃分析。
本研究正在进行中,之后将提交给同行评审期刊发表。
本研究将为EA和TENS对膝关节骨关节炎疼痛控制的效果提供全面证据。
CRD42018091826。