Suppr超能文献

经皮电刺激神经疗法治疗膝骨关节炎

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for knee osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Osiri M, Welch V, Brosseau L, Shea B, McGowan J, Tugwell P, Wells G

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, 501 Smyth Road, LM-12, Ottawa General Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD002823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002823.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease that affects synovial joints, which mainly causes degeneration and destruction of hyaline cartilage. To date, no curative treatment for OA exists. The primary goals for OA therapy are to relieve pain, maintain or improve functional status, and minimize deformity. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a noninvasive modality in physiotherapy that is commonly used to control both acute and chronic pain arising from several conditions. A number of trials evaluating the efficacy of TENS in OA have been published.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of TENS in the treatment of knee OA. The primary outcomes of interest were those described by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) 3, which included pain relief, functional status, patient global assessment, and change in joint imaging for studies of one year or longer. The secondary objective was to determine the most effective mode of TENS application in pain control.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, HEALTHSTAR, PEDro, Current Contents and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register using the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group search strategy for trials up to and including December 1999. We also hand-searched reference lists and consulted content experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Two independent reviewers selected the trials that met predetermined inclusion criteria.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers extracted the data using standardized forms and assessed the quality of randomization, blinding and dropouts. A third reviewer was consulted to resolve any differences. For dichotomous outcomes, relative risks (RR) were calculated. For continuous data, weighted mean differences (WMD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) of the change from baseline were calculated. A fixed effects model was used unless heterogeneity of the populations existed. In this case, a random effects model was used.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven trials were eligible to be included in this review. Six used TENS as the active treatment while one study used acupuncture-like TENS (AL-TENS). A number of 148 and 146 patients were involved in the active TENS treatment and placebo, respectively. Three studies were cross-over studies and the others were parallel group, randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Median methodological quality of these studies was two. Pain relief from active TENS and AL-TENS treatment was significantly better than placebo treatment. Knee stiffness also improved significantly in active treatment group compared to placebo. Different modes of TENS setting (High Rate and Strong Burst Mode TENS) demonstrated a significant benefit in pain relief of the knee OA over placebo. Subgroup analyses showed a heterogeneity in the studies with methodological quality of three or more and those with repeated TENS applications.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: TENS and AL-TENS are shown to be effective in pain control over placebo in this review. Heterogeneity of the included studies was observed, which might be due to the different study designs and outcomes used. More well designed studies with a standardized protocol and adequate number of participants are needed to conclude the effectiveness of TENS in the treatment of OA of the knee.

摘要

背景

骨关节炎(OA)是一种影响滑膜关节的疾病,主要导致透明软骨的退变和破坏。迄今为止,尚无针对OA的治愈性疗法。OA治疗的主要目标是缓解疼痛、维持或改善功能状态并使畸形最小化。经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)是物理治疗中的一种非侵入性方法,常用于控制由多种病症引起的急慢性疼痛。已经发表了多项评估TENS治疗OA疗效的试验。

目的

评估TENS治疗膝骨关节炎的有效性。主要关注的结局是风湿病临床试验疗效指标(OMERACT)3所描述的指标,包括疼痛缓解、功能状态、患者整体评估以及为期一年或更长时间研究中的关节影像学变化。次要目的是确定TENS应用于疼痛控制的最有效模式。

检索策略

我们使用Cochrane肌肉骨骼组检索策略检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、HEALTHSTAR、PEDro、《现刊目次》以及Cochrane对照试验注册库,检索截至1999年12月(含该月)的试验。我们还手工检索了参考文献列表并咨询了内容专家。

选择标准

两名独立的评审员选择符合预定纳入标准的试验。

数据收集与分析

两名独立的评审员使用标准化表格提取数据,并评估随机化、盲法和失访的质量。如有任何分歧,会咨询第三位评审员以解决。对于二分法结局,计算相对危险度(RR)。对于连续数据,计算从基线变化的加权均数差(WMD)或标准化均数差(SMD)。除非人群存在异质性,否则使用固定效应模型。在这种情况下,则使用随机效应模型。

主要结果

七项试验符合纳入本综述的条件。六项试验将TENS用作积极治疗,而一项研究使用类针刺TENS(AL-TENS)。积极TENS治疗组和安慰剂组分别涉及148名和146名患者。三项研究为交叉试验,其他为平行组随机对照试验(RCT)。这些研究的方法学质量中位数为2。积极TENS和AL-TENS治疗的疼痛缓解明显优于安慰剂治疗。与安慰剂相比,积极治疗组的膝关节僵硬也有显著改善。不同的TENS设置模式(高速率和强脉冲模式TENS)在膝骨关节炎的疼痛缓解方面显示出比安慰剂有显著益处。亚组分析显示,方法学质量为3或更高的研究以及重复应用TENS的研究存在异质性。

评审员结论

本综述表明,TENS和AL-TENS在疼痛控制方面比安慰剂有效。观察到纳入研究存在异质性,这可能是由于所采用的不同研究设计和结局所致。需要更多设计良好、方案标准化且参与者数量充足的研究,以确定TENS治疗膝骨关节炎的有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验