Di Berardino Stefano, Capolupo Gabriella Teresa, Caricato Chiara, Caricato Marco
Geriatric Surgery Unit, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma.
School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(28):e16310. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016310.
to investigate the role of sentinel lymph node mapping procedure in T1 Colorectal cancer.
The incidence of T1 Colorectal cancer is increasing thanks to screening and awareness campaigns. The issue concerning T1 is when to consider a local treatment curative or when it is necessary a radical resection. The histopathological features of resected polyps are able to predict the nodal spread but the value of specificity is increasingly a problem of these predictors. The sentinel lymph node procedure could be a solution.
A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines and using "sentinel node", "lymph nodes", and "colorectal cancer" as search terms in PubMed and Embase databases. References from included studies, review articles, and editorials were cross-checked. The risk of bias and quality of the included studies were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The primary outcome was sentinel lymph node accuracy rate and the secondary outcome was sentinel lymph node detection rate for T1 Colorectal cancer.
A total of 12 studies (108 patients) met inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 were monocentric cohort studies and 4 were multicentric cohort studies. The rate of sentinel lymph node accuracy in T1 colorectal cancer varies from 89% to 100%. Only 1 false negative was found. In 7 of these 12 studies (71 patients) the detection rate of T1 colorectal cancer was reported and showed a variation from 92% to 100%. Even in this case, only 1 case of failed procedure was found.
The literature on this topic agrees on that sentinel lymph node mapping, differently from breast cancer and melanomas should not be used for therapeutic purposes in colorectal cancer, but mainly to refine staging. The reason is the low sensitivity of this procedure with an accompanying high false negative rate. However, the data refers mainly to advanced stages of the disease because there are few data available on the earlier stages and in particular related to T1. Isolating the data related only to T1, the false negative rate seems to be very low. Additional studies are necessary, but a decisional role of sentinel lymph node mapping on the treatment of T1 Colorectal cancer is possible in the future.
探讨前哨淋巴结定位程序在T1期结直肠癌中的作用。
由于筛查和宣传活动,T1期结直肠癌的发病率正在上升。关于T1期的问题是何时应将局部治疗视为治愈性治疗,或何时需要进行根治性切除。切除息肉的组织病理学特征能够预测淋巴结转移,但这些预测指标的特异性价值越来越成为一个问题。前哨淋巴结程序可能是一种解决方案。
按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价,并在PubMed和Embase数据库中使用“前哨淋巴结”、“淋巴结”和“结直肠癌”作为检索词。对纳入研究、综述文章和社论的参考文献进行交叉核对。使用QUADAS-2工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险和质量。主要结局是前哨淋巴结准确率,次要结局是T1期结直肠癌的前哨淋巴结检出率。
共有12项研究(108例患者)符合纳入和排除标准,8项为单中心队列研究,4项为多中心队列研究。T1期结直肠癌的前哨淋巴结准确率在89%至100%之间。仅发现1例假阴性。在这12项研究中的7项(71例患者)中报告了T1期结直肠癌的检出率,显示其在92%至100%之间变化。即使在这种情况下,也仅发现1例手术失败病例。
关于这一主题的文献一致认为,与乳腺癌和黑色素瘤不同,前哨淋巴结定位在结直肠癌中不应用于治疗目的,而主要用于完善分期。原因是该程序的敏感性较低,同时假阴性率较高。然而,这些数据主要涉及疾病的晚期,因为关于早期阶段,特别是与T1期相关的数据很少。仅分离与T1期相关的数据,假阴性率似乎非常低。还需要进行更多研究,但未来前哨淋巴结定位在T1期结直肠癌治疗中可能发挥决定性作用。