Department of Neurological Surgery.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Oct;32(5):592-599. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000766.
To explore the data for and against the use of the various components of multimodal analgesia in cranial neurosurgery.
Postcraniotomy pain is a challenging clinical problem in that analgesia must be accomplished without affecting neurologic function (i.e. 'losing the neurologic exam'). The traditional approach with low-dose opioids is often insufficient and can cause well recognized side effects. Newer multimodal analgesic approaches have proven beneficial in a variety of other surgical patient populations. The combined use of multiple nonopioid analgesics offers the promise of improved pain control and reduced opioid administration, while preserving the clinical neurologic exam. Specifically, acetaminophen and gabapentinoids should be considered for craniotomy patients, both preoperatively and postoperatively. The gabapentinoids have the added benefit of reduced nausea. Scalp blocks have moderate quality evidence supporting their use over incisional infiltration alone, with analgesia that extends into the postoperative period. Intraoperative dexmedetomidine reduces postoperative opioid requirements with the added benefit of reduced postcraniotomy hypertension. Methocarbamol, NSAIDs [both nonspecific cyclooxygenase (COX) 1 and 2 inhibitors and specific COX-2 inhibitors], ketamine, and intravenous lidocaine require further data regarding safety and efficacy in craniotomy patients.
Opioids are the mainstay for treating acute postcraniotomy pain but should be minimized. The evidence to support a multimodal approach is growing; neuroanesthesiologists and neurosurgeons should seek to incorporate multimodal analgesia into the perioperative care of craniotomy patients. Preoperative and postoperative gabapentin and acetaminophen, intraoperative dexmedetomidine, and scalp blocks over incisional infiltration have the most data for benefit, with good safety profiles. Further research is needed to define the safety, efficacy, and dosing parameters for NSAIDs including COX-2 inhibitors, methocarbamol, ketamine, and intravenous lidocaine in cranial neurosurgery.
探讨在颅神经外科中使用多种模式镇痛的各个组成部分的相关数据。
术后头痛是一个具有挑战性的临床问题,因为在不影响神经功能(即“失去神经检查”)的情况下必须实现镇痛。传统的低剂量阿片类药物方法通常效果不足,且会引起公认的副作用。新型的多模式镇痛方法已被证明对多种其他手术患者人群有益。多种非阿片类镇痛药的联合使用有望改善疼痛控制和减少阿片类药物的使用,同时保留临床神经检查。具体而言,应考虑在术前和术后对开颅术患者使用对乙酰氨基酚和加巴喷丁类药物。加巴喷丁类药物还有减少恶心的额外益处。头皮阻滞有中等质量的证据支持其与单独切口浸润相比的使用,可延长到术后镇痛。术中右美托咪定可减少术后阿片类药物的需求,并具有降低开颅术后高血压的额外益处。美索巴莫、非甾体抗炎药(包括非特异性环氧化酶(COX)1 和 2 抑制剂和特异性 COX-2 抑制剂)、氯胺酮和静脉利多卡因在开颅术患者中的安全性和疗效需要更多的数据。
阿片类药物是治疗急性术后头痛的主要药物,但应尽量减少使用。支持多模式方法的证据正在增加;神经麻醉师和神经外科医生应寻求将多模式镇痛纳入开颅术患者的围手术期护理。术前和术后加巴喷丁和对乙酰氨基酚、术中右美托咪定和切口浸润的头皮阻滞具有最多的获益数据,且安全性良好。需要进一步研究来定义 NSAIDs(包括 COX-2 抑制剂、美索巴莫、氯胺酮和静脉利多卡因)在颅神经外科中的安全性、疗效和剂量参数。