Jarkvist Jesper, Salehi Clara, Akin Cem, Gülen Theo
Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Immunology and Allergy Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Allergy. 2020 Jan;75(1):169-177. doi: 10.1111/all.13980. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
Patients with clonal mast cell disorders (cMCD), systemic mastocytosis (SM) and monoclonal mast cell activation syndrome (MMAS), represent an increased risk for Hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis (HVA). Lifelong venom immunotherapy (VIT) is recommended; however, its efficacy and safety are controversial. Hence, we sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VIT in HVA patients with cMCD.
A retrospective study was conducted among 46 patients with Vespula venom allergy who had experienced severe HVA, 32 cMCD (22 with SM and 10 with MMAS) and 14 controls. There were no differences between cMCD patients and controls in age (58 vs 66) and duration of VIT (47 vs 48 months), respectively.
During VIT, 11 (34%) cMCD patients experienced adverse reactions (ARs) (7% in controls), including 1 anaphylaxis. There were 23 re-stings in 17 (53%) patients during VIT. Of episodes, four (17%) presented with anaphylaxis, 14 (60%) presented with local reaction, and five (23%) were asymptomatic. In 11 episodes (48%), the patient did not take epinephrine, of these 8 (73%) presented with local reaction, and 3 (27%) were asymptomatic. Patient-based protection from anaphylaxis was 76% (4/17) in cMCD vs. 100% in controls during VIT. The venom-specific IgG4 concentrations increased during VIT (P < .001) although tryptase and IgE were unaltered.
Both safety and efficacy of VIT in cMCD patients were slightly reduced than controls. Severe ARs were rare. The elevated IgG4 levels may be a biomarker for efficacy of VIT in cMCD patients, as it correlates with protection from re-stings.
克隆性肥大细胞疾病(cMCD)、系统性肥大细胞增多症(SM)和单克隆肥大细胞活化综合征(MMAS)患者发生膜翅目毒液过敏反应(HVA)的风险增加。推荐进行终身毒液免疫治疗(VIT);然而,其疗效和安全性存在争议。因此,我们试图评估VIT对cMCD的HVA患者的疗效和安全性。
对46例曾经历严重HVA的黄蜂毒液过敏患者进行了一项回顾性研究,其中32例为cMCD(22例为SM,10例为MMAS),14例为对照。cMCD患者与对照在年龄(58岁对66岁)和VIT持续时间(47个月对48个月)方面分别无差异。
在VIT期间,11例(34%)cMCD患者出现不良反应(ARs)(对照中为7%),包括1例过敏反应。在VIT期间,17例(53%)患者中有23次再次被蜇。在这些事件中,4例(17%)出现过敏反应,14例(60%)出现局部反应,5例(23%)无症状。在11次事件(48%)中,患者未使用肾上腺素,其中8例(73%)出现局部反应,3例(27%)无症状。在VIT期间,cMCD患者基于个体的过敏反应防护率为76%(4/17),而对照为100%。尽管类胰蛋白酶和IgE未改变,但毒液特异性IgG4浓度在VIT期间升高(P <.001)。
VIT对cMCD患者的安全性和疗效均略低于对照。严重ARs罕见。IgG4水平升高可能是VIT对cMCD患者疗效的一个生物标志物,因为它与再次被蜇的防护相关。