Demšar Luzar Ajda, Rijavec Matija, Košnik Mitja, Bidovec-Stojković Urška, Debeljak Jerneja, Zidarn Mihaela, Kopač Peter, Korošec Peter
Laboratory for Clinical Immunology and Molecular Genetics, University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, 4204 Golnik, Slovenia.
Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Biomolecules. 2024 Nov 24;14(12):1494. doi: 10.3390/biom14121494.
venom allergy (HVA) is an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reaction caused by species stings (honeybee, vespid, or ant). The only effective treatment is venom immunotherapy (VIT). Our study aimed to evaluate whether humoral and cellular biomarkers measured before, during, and after honeybee VIT are associated with the success of VIT, which was assessed by the response to a sting challenge one year after finishing VIT. In this prospective study, blood biomarkers of 25 patients undergoing honeybee VIT at the referral center in Slovenia were evaluated. A controlled honeybee sting challenge confirmed successful VIT in 20 of 25 (80%) patients. Honeybee venom (HBV) recombinant allergen profiles, evaluated before the treatment, were comparable between responders and non-responders. Longitudinal follow-up, up to 1 year after finishing VIT, showed that the immune responses do not differ significantly between patients with successful VIT and treatment failure. Those responses were characterized by decreased sIgE, tIgE, and BST, whereas sIgG4 levels increased. The basophil sensitivity also significantly decreases after VIT in both groups of patients. The analyzed biomarker which correlated considerably with treatment failure was higher basophil sensitivity to allergen stimulation before VIT. Similarly, systemic adverse events (SAEs) during the build-up phase of VIT correlated with treatment failure. Our study demonstrated similar sensitization profiles, and humoral and basophil immune responses to immunotherapy, in two different well-characterized groups of patients, one with successful VIT and the other with treatment failure. Notably, only high basophil sensitivity measured before VIT and SAEs during VIT were significantly associated with VIT failure, and both have the potential to be predictors of VIT failure.
蜂毒过敏(HVA)是一种由蜜蜂、黄蜂或蚂蚁叮咬引起的IgE介导的超敏反应。唯一有效的治疗方法是蜂毒免疫疗法(VIT)。我们的研究旨在评估在蜜蜂VIT治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后测量的体液和细胞生物标志物是否与VIT的成功相关,VIT的成功通过完成VIT一年后对蜇刺激发试验的反应来评估。在这项前瞻性研究中,对斯洛文尼亚转诊中心接受蜜蜂VIT治疗的25名患者的血液生物标志物进行了评估。一项对照蜜蜂蜇刺激发试验证实,25名患者中有20名(80%)VIT治疗成功。治疗前评估的蜜蜂毒液(HBV)重组过敏原谱在反应者和无反应者之间具有可比性。VIT结束后长达1年的纵向随访表明,VIT治疗成功的患者和治疗失败的患者之间的免疫反应没有显著差异。这些反应的特征是sIgE、tIgE和BST水平降低,而sIgG4水平升高。两组患者VIT治疗后嗜碱性粒细胞敏感性也显著降低。与治疗失败相关性显著的分析生物标志物是VIT治疗前嗜碱性粒细胞对过敏原刺激的敏感性较高。同样,VIT累积期的全身性不良事件(SAE)与治疗失败相关。我们的研究表明,在两组特征明确的不同患者中,一组VIT治疗成功,另一组治疗失败,它们对免疫疗法的致敏谱、体液和嗜碱性粒细胞免疫反应相似。值得注意的是,只有VIT治疗前测量的高嗜碱性粒细胞敏感性和VIT治疗期间的SAE与VIT治疗失败显著相关,两者都有可能成为VIT治疗失败的预测指标。