• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑深部电刺激中的电极固定:中国三种电极锚定装置的比较

Lead fixation in deep brain stimulation: comparison of three lead anchoring devices in China.

作者信息

Wang Tao, Pan Yixin, Zhang Chencheng, Zhan Shikun, Sun Bomin, Li Dianyou

机构信息

Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No.197, Ruijin Second Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0558-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-019-0558-9
PMID:31307448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6631761/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) depends on precise electrode positioning, which has been pursued for ideal treatment outcomes. As a critical component of DBS, the fixation performance of lead anchoring devices has been widely studied. Possible reasons for lead shift were analyzed in the current study and we further provided effective solutions to reduce potential manual errors.

METHODS

Seventy-nine patients who received DBS implantations at the Ruijin Hospital from April to November 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Intraoperative lead shifts were measured by C-arm fluoroscopy. Lead adjustment counts were recorded and compared among three lead fixation devices: Stimloc™ (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA), TouchLoc (SceneRay, Suzhou, China), and the traditional lead anchoring device.

RESULTS

Mean (± SD) distances of lead shifts were 0.29 ± 2.42 mm in Stimloc devices, 0.43 ± 0.55 mm in TouchLoc devices, and 1.52 ± 1.05 mm in traditional devices (p < 0.0001). Average numbers of adjustments in this series were 0.3 ± 0.5 in Stimloc devices, 0.3 ± 1.3 in TouchLoc devices, and 1.1 ± 1.0 in traditional devices (p = 0.0001). Pairwise comparisons among the three devices (TouchLoc vs. Stimloc: p = 0.273; TouchLoc vs. Traditional: p = 0.0001; Stimloc vs. traditional: p < 0.0001) suggested significant differences, which were mainly attributed to the traditional devices.

CONCLUSIONS

Three lead anchoring devices have been compared for their performance in the accuracy of lead fixation, in which the newly designed lead fixation devices have presented its advantages to the traditional one. In addition to the application of the Stimloc and TouchLoc devices, verification by C-arm fluoroscopy should be performed to provide an intuitive view of the depth deviation of electrode position during DBS electrode implantation.

摘要

背景

脑深部电刺激术(DBS)的准确性取决于电极的精确放置,这一直是为了实现理想的治疗效果而追求的目标。作为DBS的一个关键组成部分,导线锚定装置的固定性能已得到广泛研究。本研究分析了导线移位的可能原因,并进一步提供了有效的解决方案以减少潜在的人为误差。

方法

回顾性分析了2017年4月至11月在瑞金医院接受DBS植入手术的79例患者。术中通过C型臂荧光透视测量导线移位情况。记录并比较了三种导线固定装置(Stimloc™,美敦力公司,明尼阿波利斯,美国明尼苏达州;TouchLoc,苏州景昱医疗器械有限公司;以及传统导线锚定装置)的导线调整次数。

结果

Stimloc装置中导线移位的平均(±标准差)距离为0.29±2.42毫米,TouchLoc装置中为0.43±0.55毫米,传统装置中为1.52±1.05毫米(p<0.0001)。本系列中,Stimloc装置的平均调整次数为0.3±0.5次,TouchLoc装置为0.3±1.3次,传统装置为1.1±1.0次(p=0.0001)。三种装置之间的两两比较(TouchLoc与Stimloc:p=0.273;TouchLoc与传统装置:p=0.0001;Stimloc与传统装置:p<0.0001)显示存在显著差异,主要归因于传统装置。

结论

比较了三种导线锚定装置在导线固定准确性方面的性能,其中新设计的导线固定装置相对于传统装置具有优势。除了应用Stimloc和TouchLoc装置外,还应通过C型臂荧光透视进行验证,以直观呈现DBS电极植入过程中电极位置的深度偏差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5a/6631761/171425b1aa6c/12893_2019_558_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5a/6631761/62322a6f85dd/12893_2019_558_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5a/6631761/03981e768456/12893_2019_558_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5a/6631761/c44d52bb2d5c/12893_2019_558_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5a/6631761/171425b1aa6c/12893_2019_558_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5a/6631761/62322a6f85dd/12893_2019_558_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5a/6631761/03981e768456/12893_2019_558_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5a/6631761/c44d52bb2d5c/12893_2019_558_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc5a/6631761/171425b1aa6c/12893_2019_558_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Lead fixation in deep brain stimulation: comparison of three lead anchoring devices in China.脑深部电刺激中的电极固定:中国三种电极锚定装置的比较
BMC Surg. 2019 Jul 15;19(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0558-9.
2
Evaluation of 3D C-Arm Fluoroscopy versus Diagnostic CT for Deep Brain Stimulation Stereotactic Registration and Post-Operative Lead Localization.3D C 臂透视与诊断 CT 用于深部脑刺激立体定向注册和术后导丝定位的评估。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2024;102(3):195-202. doi: 10.1159/000536017. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
Directional Leads for Deep Brain Stimulation: Technical Notes and Experiences.立体定向引导的深部脑刺激术:技术要点及经验。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2021;99(4):305-312. doi: 10.1159/000512231. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
4
Deep brain stimulation lead fixation after Stimloc failure.Stimloc 故障后深部脑刺激导联固定。
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Dec;19(12):1715-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
5
Management of referred deep brain stimulation failures: a retrospective analysis from 2 movement disorders centers.深部脑刺激术间接性失效的管理:来自两个运动障碍中心的回顾性分析
Arch Neurol. 2005 Aug;62(8):1250-5. doi: 10.1001/archneur.62.8.noc40425. Epub 2005 Jun 13.
6
Deep brain stimulation lead fixation: a comparative study of the Navigus and Medtronic burr hole fixation device.脑深部电刺激导线固定:Navigus与美敦力骨孔固定装置的比较研究
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005 Aug;107(5):393-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.11.002. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
7
Postoperative lead migration in deep brain stimulation surgery: Incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact.脑深部电刺激手术中术后电极移位:发生率、危险因素及临床影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 13;12(9):e0183711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183711. eCollection 2017.
8
Revision Surgery of Deep Brain Stimulation Leads.脑深部刺激电极的翻修手术
Neuromodulation. 2016 Jul;19(5):443-50. doi: 10.1111/ner.12404. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
9
Novel Approach to Securing Deep Brain Stimulation Leads: Technique and Analysis of Lead Migration, Breakage, and Surgical Infection.确保脑深部电刺激导线安全的新方法:导线迁移、断裂及手术感染的技术与分析
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2016;94(1):18-23. doi: 10.1159/000442893. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Deep brain stimulation hardware complications in patients with movement disorders: risk factors and clinical correlations.运动障碍患者深部脑刺激硬件并发症:危险因素及临床相关性
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2012;90(5):300-6. doi: 10.1159/000338222. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Rotation in the Early Postoperative Period.术后早期定向性脑深部电刺激电极旋转
Neurosurg Pract. 2024 Jul 19;5(3):e00087. doi: 10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000102. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
A General Framework for Characterizing Inaccuracy in Stereotactic Systems.立体定向系统中误差表征的通用框架。
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2025 Mar 1;28(3):322-336. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001423. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
3
How to avoid pneumocephalus in deep brain stimulation surgery? Analysis of potential risk factors in a series of 100 consecutive patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Postoperative lead migration in deep brain stimulation surgery: Incidence, risk factors, and clinical impact.脑深部电刺激手术中术后电极移位:发生率、危险因素及临床影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 13;12(9):e0183711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183711. eCollection 2017.
2
Neurostimulation Devices for the Treatment of Neurologic Disorders.用于治疗神经系统疾病的神经刺激装置
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Sep;92(9):1427-1444. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.05.005.
3
Novel Approach to Securing Deep Brain Stimulation Leads: Technique and Analysis of Lead Migration, Breakage, and Surgical Infection.
如何避免深部脑刺激手术中的气颅?对 100 例连续患者的潜在危险因素分析。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jan;163(1):177-184. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04588-z. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
4
Update on Current Technologies for Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.帕金森病深部脑刺激的当前技术进展
J Mov Disord. 2020 Sep;13(3):185-198. doi: 10.14802/jmd.20052. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
确保脑深部电刺激导线安全的新方法:导线迁移、断裂及手术感染的技术与分析
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2016;94(1):18-23. doi: 10.1159/000442893. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
4
Location, location, location: Validating the position of deep brain stimulation electrodes.位置,位置,还是位置:验证深部脑刺激电极的位置
Mov Disord. 2016 Mar;31(3):259. doi: 10.1002/mds.26553. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
Technological Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation.深部脑刺激的技术进展
J Parkinsons Dis. 2015;5(3):483-96. doi: 10.3233/JPD-150579.
6
Subthalamus deep brain stimulation for primary dystonia patients: a long-term follow-up study.丘脑底核脑深部电刺激治疗原发性肌张力障碍患者:一项长期随访研究。
Mov Disord. 2013 Nov;28(13):1877-82. doi: 10.1002/mds.25586. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
7
Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: 8 years of follow-up.丘脑底核脑深部电刺激术治疗帕金森病:8 年随访。
Transl Neurodegener. 2013 May 24;2(1):11. doi: 10.1186/2047-9158-2-11.
8
Deep brain stimulation lead fixation after Stimloc failure.Stimloc 故障后深部脑刺激导联固定。
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Dec;19(12):1715-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.02.017. Epub 2012 Sep 23.
9
Intraoperative x-ray to measure distance between DBS leads: A reliability study.术中 X 射线测量 DBS 导联之间的距离:一项可靠性研究。
Mov Disord. 2012 Jul;27(8):1056-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.25056. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
10
Deep brain stimulation in China: present and future.中国的深部脑刺激:现状与未来。
Neuromodulation. 2012 May-Jun;15(3):251-9; discussion 259. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00439.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29.