Muñoz E, Seltzer V, Dietzek A, Pace B, Goldstein J, Wise L
Department of Obstetrics-Gynecology, Queens Hospital Center, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, State University of New York, New Hyde Park 11042.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 May;158(5):1176-82. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90249-9.
The purpose of this study was to analyze whether clinical variables could stratify hospital costs within gynecology diagnosis-related groups. We analyzed 3171 gynecologic admissions to a large teaching hospital and found that the parameters of nonemergency and intensive care unit admission and blood or plasma product utilization could stratify hospital costs and outcome within a gynecology diagnosis-related group. Patients with the variables had higher total hospital costs, a longer hospital length of stay, more procedures per patient, a greater proportion of outliers, and a higher mortality than patients without the variables. This study demonstrates that these four clinical variables could be used to focus cost-containment efforts on gynecologic patients incurring higher costs in the coming era of limited resources.
本研究的目的是分析临床变量是否能够在妇科诊断相关组中对医院成本进行分层。我们分析了一家大型教学医院的3171例妇科住院病例,发现非急诊和重症监护病房入住情况以及血液或血浆制品使用情况等参数能够在妇科诊断相关组内对医院成本和结局进行分层。具有这些变量的患者比没有这些变量的患者总住院成本更高、住院时间更长、每位患者接受的手术更多、异常值比例更大且死亡率更高。本研究表明,在资源有限的未来时代,这四个临床变量可用于将成本控制工作集中于那些产生较高成本的妇科患者。