• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助化疗后根治性手术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌患者的健康相关生活质量:来自前瞻性数据库的单中心回顾性研究。

Health-related quality of life in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery: A single-institutional retrospective study from a prospective database.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Xi'an International Medical Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):583-589. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.005
PMID:31307665
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) or radiation (RT) alone followed by radical surgery (RS).

METHODS

In a single-center retrospective study from a prospective database, 275 FIGO Stage IB2-IIIB patients who underwent CCRT/RT + RS were included. HRQOL was prospectively assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CX24 prior to any treatment (baseline) and 6 months after surgery, respectively.

RESULTS

A statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in physical functioning (P < 0.001) and role functioning (P = 0.002, P = 0.031) was observed in patients receiving either CCRT+RS or RT + RS at follow-up. In addition, quality of life (QoL), physical functioning, and social functioning were better in the RT + RS group than the CCRT+RS group after treatment (P = 0.028, P = 0.010, P = 0.014). Symptom scores of fatigue decreased in both groups over time (P < 0.001, P = 0.004) while insomnia decreased only in the RT + RS group (P = 0.042). Worsened menopausal symptoms were documented in both groups at follow-up (P = 0.001, P = 0.047), while lymphedema was deteriorated only in patients receiving CCRT + RS (P < 0.001). Sexuality scores did not differ between groups or over time with the exception of sexual worry, which was deteriorated in patients receiving RT + RS (P = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

QLQ-C30 functioning and tumor-related symptoms scores improved while lymphedema and menopausal symptoms worsened 6 months after neoadjuvant CCRT or RT alone followed by RS in LACC patients. Patients treated with RT + RS had a generally better HRQOL compared with those receiving CCRT+RS, though further validation with prospective randomized clinical trials is warranted.

摘要

目的

评估新辅助同步放化疗(CCRT)或单纯放疗(RT)后行根治性手术(RS)治疗局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)。

方法

本研究为单中心回顾性研究,来源于前瞻性数据库,共纳入 275 例接受 CCRT/RT+RS 的 FIGO 分期 IB2-IIIB 期患者。在治疗前(基线)和术后 6 个月,分别采用 EORTC QLQ-C30 和 EORTC QLQ-CX24 对 HRQOL 进行前瞻性评估。

结果

接受 CCRT+RS 或 RT+RS 治疗的患者在随访时,身体功能(P<0.001)和角色功能(P=0.002,P=0.031)有统计学意义且具有临床意义的改善。此外,治疗后 RT+RS 组的生活质量、身体功能和社会功能均优于 CCRT+RS 组(P=0.028,P=0.010,P=0.014)。两组患者的疲劳症状评分随时间推移而降低(P<0.001,P=0.004),而失眠症状仅在 RT+RS 组降低(P=0.042)。两组患者在随访时均出现更严重的绝经症状(P=0.001,P=0.047),而 CCRT+RS 组仅出现淋巴水肿恶化(P<0.001)。两组患者的性功能评分无差异,但 RT+RS 组的性担忧恶化(P=0.042)。

结论

新辅助 CCRT 或 RT 后行 RS 治疗 LACC 患者,6 个月后,QLQ-C30 功能和肿瘤相关症状评分改善,而淋巴水肿和绝经症状恶化。与接受 CCRT+RS 治疗的患者相比,接受 RT+RS 治疗的患者一般具有更好的 HRQOL,但需要前瞻性随机临床试验进一步验证。

相似文献

1
Health-related quality of life in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery: A single-institutional retrospective study from a prospective database.新辅助化疗后根治性手术治疗局部晚期宫颈癌患者的健康相关生活质量:来自前瞻性数据库的单中心回顾性研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;154(3):583-589. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
2
The long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy compared with radical surgery alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced-stage cervical cancer.新辅助化疗后行根治性子宫切除术与单纯根治性手术或同期放化疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的长期疗效比较。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Jan;21(1):92-9. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181fe8b6e.
3
Long-Term Toxicity and Quality of Life in Patients Treated for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.局部晚期宫颈癌患者的长期毒性反应及生活质量
Oncology. 2016;90(1):29-35. doi: 10.1159/000441226. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
4
Quality of life of locally advanced cervical cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation versus chemoradiation alone (CIRCE trial): a randomized phase II trial.新辅助化疗后放化疗与单纯放化疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌患者的生活质量比较(CIRCE 试验):一项随机 II 期试验。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Jun;30(6):749-756. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-001134. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
Quality of life and emotional distress in early stage and locally advanced cervical cancer patients: a prospective, longitudinal study.早期和局部晚期宫颈癌患者的生活质量和情绪困扰:一项前瞻性、纵向研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Mar;124(3):389-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.041. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
6
Long-term Quality of Life and Sexual Function After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Surgery for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.局部晚期宫颈癌新辅助化疗联合根治性手术后的长期生活质量和性功能。
J Sex Med. 2022 Apr;19(4):613-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.01.519. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
7
Effectiveness comparisons of various therapies for FIGO stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.FIGO 分期 IB2/IIA2 宫颈癌各种治疗方法的有效性比较:贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 6;21(1):1078. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08685-9.
8
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.新辅助化疗后根治性手术与同期放化疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的多中心回顾性分析。
J Invest Surg. 2022 Feb;35(2):308-314. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1856239. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
9
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy (with or without Chemotherapy) in Patients with Stage IB2, IIA, or IIB Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新辅助化疗后行根治性手术与放疗(含或不含化疗)治疗 IB2 期、IIA 期或 IIB 期宫颈癌患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Markers. 2020 Jul 27;2020:7415056. doi: 10.1155/2020/7415056. eCollection 2020.
10
Health-Related Quality of Life in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients After Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy Including Image Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy: An Analysis From the EMBRACE Study.根治性放化疗联合影像引导自适应近距离放疗后局部晚期宫颈癌患者的健康相关生活质量:来自 EMBRACE 研究的分析。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Apr 1;94(5):1088-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.12.363. Epub 2015 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Life and Stress-Related Psychological Distress Among Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.宫颈癌患者的生活质量与压力相关心理困扰:一项横断面分析。
Diseases. 2025 Feb 25;13(3):70. doi: 10.3390/diseases13030070.
2
Quality of Life in Cervical Cancer Survivors Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.同步放化疗治疗宫颈癌后患者的生活质量。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 17;59(4):777. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040777.
3
A systematic review of the impact of contemporary treatment modalities for cervical cancer on women's self-reported health-related quality of life.
系统评价当代宫颈癌治疗方式对女性自报告健康相关生活质量的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Oct;28(10):4627-4644. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05554-2. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
4
The outcomes and quality of life of young patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy versus non-radiotherapy following surgery treating early FIGO stage cervical squamous cell cancer in southwestern China.中国西南部接受手术治疗的早期 FIGO 期宫颈鳞癌的年轻患者,术后接受辅助放疗与非放疗的结局和生活质量比较。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 12;10(1):9583. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66661-y.