Bajunaid Salwa O, Altwaim Bashaer, Alhassan Muneera, Alammari Rawan
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Phone: +(966)590028784, e-mail:
College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Apr 1;20(4):476-481.
To evaluate the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) metal frameworks fabricated by the conventional lost-wax (CLW) technique and those made by the selective laser melting (SLM).
A dentoform of a mandibular Kennedy class III, modification 1 dental arch were surveyed, and rest seats were prepared on the abutment teeth. The dentoform was then duplicated into a metal die which was used as a reference model. Thirty RPD metal frameworks were fabricated by two techniques; fifteen for each technique. Polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impression material was painted on the intaglio surface of the rests of each framework which is then seated on the reference die. PVS specimens that represent the gap under the rest were measured in four zones: buccal, lingual, marginal and central by a single examiner using a digital microscope at 50x in micrometers.
Comparison between the two techniques for each abutment tooth revealed that the CLW technique had better fit in one tooth, while the SLM technique showed a better fit in two teeth. Regarding the edentulous span length within the SLM technique, the long edentulous span had a significantly better fit. When comparing the four measured rest zones, it was found that in the CLW technique group, the marginal zone had the highest fit accuracy while the lingual zone showed the lowest fit accuracy. In the SLM group, the central zone had the best fit and the buccal zone had the worst fit.
RPD frameworks fabricated using the SLM technique showed better fit accuracy than those made by the CLW technique, however, the difference was not statistically significant.
SLM is a promising technique for the fabrication of RPD frameworks in routine clinical practice.
评估采用传统失蜡法(CLW)制作的可摘局部义齿(RPD)金属支架与选择性激光熔化(SLM)制作的金属支架的精度。
对一个下颌Kennedy III类、改良1型牙弓的牙模型进行测绘,并在基牙上制备支托凹。然后将该牙模型复制成金属模具,用作参考模型。通过两种技术制作30个RPD金属支架;每种技术制作15个。将聚乙烯基硅氧烷(PVS)印模材料涂覆在每个支架支托的内表面,然后将其放置在参考模具上。由一名检查者使用数字显微镜在50倍放大倍数下以微米为单位测量代表支托下方间隙的PVS标本,测量颊侧、舌侧、边缘和中央四个区域。
对每个基牙的两种技术进行比较,结果显示CLW技术在一颗牙上的贴合度更好,而SLM技术在两颗牙上的贴合度更好。关于SLM技术内的无牙区跨度,长无牙区的贴合度明显更好。比较四个测量的支托区域时,发现在CLW技术组中,边缘区域的贴合精度最高,而舌侧区域的贴合精度最低。在SLM组中,中央区域的贴合度最佳,颊侧区域的贴合度最差。
采用SLM技术制作的RPD支架比采用CLW技术制作的支架具有更好的贴合精度,然而,差异无统计学意义。
SLM是常规临床实践中制作RPD支架的一种有前景的技术。