Department of Health, Ethics and Society, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of International Health, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Health Care Anal. 2019 Dec;27(4):309-321. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00379-5.
International guidelines recommend that prenatal screening for fetal abnormalities should only be offered within a non-directive framework aimed at enabling women in making meaningful reproductive choices. Whilst this position is widely endorsed, developments in cell-free fetal DNA based Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing are now raising questions about its continued suitability for guiding screening policy and practice. This issue is most apparent within debates on the scope of the screening offer. Implied by the aim of enabling meaningful reproductive choices is the idea that screening services should support women in accessing prenatal tests that best enable them to realize the types of reproductive choice that they find important. However, beyond whatever options meet the quality standards required for facilitating an informed decision, the remaining criteria of facilitating autonomous choice is strictly non-directive. As a result, policy makers receive little indication prior to consultation with each individual woman, about what conditions should be prioritized during the offer of screening. In this paper we try to address this issue by using the capabilities approach to further specify the non-directive aim of enabling meaningful reproductive choice. The resulting framework is then used to assess the relative importance of offering prenatal screening where concerning different types of genetic condition. We conclude that greater priority may be ascribed to offering prenatal screening for conditions that more significantly diminish a woman's central capabilities. It follows that serious congenital and earlier-onset conditions are more likely to fulfill these criteria.
国际指南建议,胎儿异常的产前筛查应仅在非指令性框架内提供,旨在使妇女能够做出有意义的生殖选择。虽然这一立场得到了广泛支持,但基于游离胎儿 DNA 的非侵入性产前检测的发展,现在对其继续适合指导筛查政策和实践提出了质疑。这一问题在关于筛查范围的争论中最为明显。使有意义的生殖选择成为可能的目标意味着,筛查服务应支持妇女获得最佳的产前检测,使她们能够实现她们认为重要的生殖选择类型。然而,除了满足促进知情决策所需的质量标准的任何选择之外,促进自主选择的剩余标准是严格非指令性的。因此,在与每个妇女进行咨询之前,政策制定者几乎没有得到任何指示,了解在提供筛查时应该优先考虑哪些条件。在本文中,我们试图通过使用能力方法进一步具体说明使有意义的生殖选择成为可能的非指令性目标来解决这一问题。然后,使用该框架来评估在关注不同类型的遗传状况时提供产前筛查的相对重要性。我们得出的结论是,对于那些更显著地削弱妇女核心能力的状况,可能会赋予更大的优先级来提供产前筛查。因此,严重的先天性和早期发病的状况更有可能符合这些标准。