Robbins Amy, Loader Joanne, de Villiers Deidre, Beyer Hawthorne L, Hanger Jonathan
Endeavour Veterinary Ecology Pty Ltd, 1695 Pumicestone Road, Toorbul, 4510, Queensland, Australia.
School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072, Queensland, Australia.
Aust Vet J. 2019 Sep;97(9):351-356. doi: 10.1111/avj.12840. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) are experiencing significant declines across the northern part of their range. However, unbiased, population-level estimates of mortality are rarely reported, as it's difficult to quantify causes of mortality robustly in this cryptic species. We aimed to determine the relative importance of carpet python (Morelia spilota) predation in a free-living koala population and describe the characteristic pathological findings during necropsy. In total, 503 koalas were captured, underwent veterinary examination and telemetric tagging, and were monitored after release over a four-year period. Mortalities were detected when activity data reported by K-Tracker® biotelemetry collars indicated low or zero activity, or during routine field monitoring events. Experienced koala veterinarians performed thorough, standardised necropsy examinations on retrieved carcasses to determine causes of death. The three, sometimes subtle, cardinal signs used to definitively diagnose carpet python-caused deaths of koalas were a U-shaped primary bite site, slicking of the fur by python saliva (particularly around the face), and diffuse, uniform pulmonary congestion. We found that carpet pythons were important predators of koalas, second only to wild dogs (dingoes and dingo hybrids (Canis familiaris dingo)), accounting for 11.6% of predation deaths and 7.2% of total deaths. Less than half (38%) of the koalas killed by carpet pythons were ingested. Though carpet pythons are known predators of koalas, their relative importance as a cause of mortality hasn't previously been recognised. Population viability analyses and conservation management plans benefit from robust cause-of-death data collected during longitudinal monitoring studies, requiring telemetry methods that facilitate rapid detection of mortalities.
考拉(树袋熊,学名:Phascolarctos cinereus)在其分布范围的北部正经历显著数量下降。然而,很少有关于死亡率的无偏差的种群水平估计报告,因为在这种隐秘的物种中很难有力地量化死亡原因。我们旨在确定地毯蟒(学名:Morelia spilota)捕食在一个自由生活的考拉种群中的相对重要性,并描述尸检期间的特征性病理发现。总共捕获了503只考拉,对它们进行了兽医检查和遥测标记,并在放归后进行了为期四年的监测。当K-Tracker®生物遥测项圈报告的活动数据显示活动量低或为零时,或者在常规野外监测活动期间,检测到死亡情况。经验丰富的考拉兽医对找回的尸体进行了全面、标准化的尸检,以确定死亡原因。用于明确诊断地毯蟒导致考拉死亡的三个有时很细微的主要迹象是呈U形的主要咬痕部位、蟒的唾液使毛发变得光滑(特别是在面部周围)以及弥漫性、均匀性的肺部充血。我们发现地毯蟒是考拉的重要捕食者,仅次于野狗(澳洲野犬及其杂交种(家犬×澳洲野犬)),占捕食死亡数的11.6%和总死亡数的7.2%。被地毯蟒杀死的考拉中不到一半(38%)被吞食。尽管地毯蟒是已知的考拉捕食者,但它们作为死亡原因的相对重要性此前尚未得到认识。种群生存力分析和保护管理计划受益于纵向监测研究期间收集的可靠死亡原因数据,这需要便于快速检测死亡情况的遥测方法。