• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解意图:社会规范是否影响刚果民主共和国使用现代避孕方法的意愿?

Getting to intent: Are social norms influencing intentions to use modern contraception in the DRC?

机构信息

FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States of America.

University of North Carolina Gillings School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 16;14(7):e0219617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219617. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0219617
PMID:31310641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6634398/
Abstract

Meeting the reproductive health needs of women in post-conflict settings is a global health priority. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, social norms perpetuate gender-based violence and contribute to low contraceptive use and high fertility. The Masculinité, Famille, et Foi (MFF) intervention is working with communities in Kinshasa to create normative environments supportive of modern contraception access and use. Our analysis uses survey data collected from 900 men and women in 17 community groups prior to the MFF intervention. We aimed to measure the extent to which social norms influence intentions to use modern contraception. Using multiple items to assess social norms and reference groups related to family planning and gender equity, we identified four distinct social norms constructs through factor analysis. Through structural equation modeling, we found that social norms influence intentions to use modern contraception overall, but that normative influence varies by gender.

摘要

满足冲突后环境下妇女的生殖健康需求是全球卫生重点。在刚果民主共和国,社会规范使基于性别的暴力永久化,并导致避孕措施使用率低和生育率高。Masculinité, Famille, et Foi(MFF)干预措施正在与金沙萨的社区合作,营造支持现代避孕措施获取和使用的规范性环境。我们的分析使用了 MFF 干预措施之前从 17 个社区团体中的 900 名男女收集的调查数据。我们旨在衡量社会规范在多大程度上影响使用现代避孕措施的意愿。我们使用多项评估与计划生育和性别平等相关的社会规范和参照群体的指标,通过因子分析确定了四个不同的社会规范结构。通过结构方程建模,我们发现社会规范总体上影响使用现代避孕措施的意愿,但规范性影响因性别而异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/6634398/66464bcb3fd0/pone.0219617.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/6634398/6c50415f7fc4/pone.0219617.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/6634398/2c3656eea201/pone.0219617.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/6634398/66464bcb3fd0/pone.0219617.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/6634398/6c50415f7fc4/pone.0219617.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/6634398/2c3656eea201/pone.0219617.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f900/6634398/66464bcb3fd0/pone.0219617.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Getting to intent: Are social norms influencing intentions to use modern contraception in the DRC?了解意图:社会规范是否影响刚果民主共和国使用现代避孕方法的意愿?
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 16;14(7):e0219617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219617. eCollection 2019.
2
Contraceptive use among adolescent and young women in North and South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo: A cross-sectional population-based survey.刚果民主共和国南北基伍省青少年和年轻女性的避孕措施使用情况:一项基于人群的横断面调查。
PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 31;17(3):e1003086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003086. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
The power of women's and men's Social Networks to catalyse normative and behavioural change: evaluation of an intervention addressing Unmet need for Family Planning in Benin.女性和男性社会网络促进规范和行为改变的力量:评估一项针对贝宁计划生育未满足需求的干预措施。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12681-4.
4
Navigating fertility, reproduction and modern contraception in the fragile context of South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo: 'Les enfants sont une richesse'.在刚果民主共和国南基伍脆弱的环境中应对生育、生殖和现代避孕问题:“孩子是一种财富”
Cult Health Sex. 2019 Mar;21(3):323-337. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2018.1470255. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
Barriers to Modern Contraceptive Use in Kinshasa, DRC.刚果民主共和国金沙萨现代避孕措施使用的障碍
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167560. eCollection 2016.
6
Gender norms and modern contraceptive use in urban Nigeria: a multilevel longitudinal study.尼日利亚城市地区的性别规范与现代避孕方法的使用:一项多层次纵向研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2018 Oct 29;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0664-3.
7
Protocol for cluster randomized evaluation of reaching married adolescents - a gender-synchronized intervention to increase modern contraceptive use among married adolescent girls and young women and their husbands in Niger.集群随机评估方案:针对已婚青少年的项目——性别同步干预,以增加尼日尔已婚少女和年轻妇女及其丈夫现代避孕方法的使用
Reprod Health. 2019 Dec 18;16(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0841-3.
8
The role of social norms on adolescent family planning in rural Kilifi county, Kenya.肯尼亚基利菲县农村青少年计划生育中社会规范的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0275824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275824. eCollection 2023.
9
Perceived norms, personal agency, and postpartum family planning intentions among first-time mothers age 15-24 years in Kinshasa: A cross-sectional analysis.15-24 岁首次生育的金沙萨年轻母亲对规范的认知、个人能动性与产后计划生育意愿:一项横断面分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0254085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254085. eCollection 2021.
10
Differences in family planning outcomes between military and general populations in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a cross-sectional analysis.刚果民主共和国金沙萨的军人和普通人群在计划生育结局方面的差异:一项横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e022295. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022295.

引用本文的文献

1
A longitudinal study examining how self-injection social norms are associated with contraceptive self-injectable interest and use in rural Uganda.一项纵向研究,考察在乌干达农村地区自我注射的社会规范如何与对可自我注射避孕药具的兴趣及使用相关联。
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jun 30;25(Suppl 1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03878-x.
2
Who actualizes postpartum contraceptive intentions? A trajectory cluster analysis.谁能实现产后避孕意愿?轨迹聚类分析。
Reprod Health. 2024 Nov 21;21(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01899-7.
3
Adaptation of the G-NORM (Gender norms scale) in Uganda: An examination of how gender norms are associated with reproductive health decision-making.

本文引用的文献

1
Scaling-up Normative Change Interventions for Adolescent and Youth Reproductive Health: An Examination of the Evidence.扩大规范改变干预措施以促进青少年和青年生殖健康:对证据的考察。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Apr;64(4S):S16-S30. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
2
Prevalence and correlates of gender inequitable norms among young, church-going women and men in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.刚果民主共和国金沙萨年轻的、常去教堂的男性和女性中性别不平等规范的流行情况及其相关因素。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 17;18(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5742-9.
3
Processing gender: lived experiences of reproducing and transforming gender norms over the life course of young people in Northern Uganda.
《在乌干达适应 G-NORM(性别规范量表):研究性别规范如何与生殖健康决策相关联》
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 4;19(11):e0308249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308249. eCollection 2024.
4
Assessment of intention to use modern contraceptives among women of reproductive age in Benin: evidence from a national population-based survey.贝宁育龄妇女使用现代避孕方法的意愿评估:基于全国人口调查的证据
Contracept Reprod Med. 2024 Aug 30;9(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40834-024-00294-8.
5
Geographic and socioeconomic inequalities in the coverage of contraception in Uttar Pradesh, India.印度北方邦避孕措施覆盖的地理和社会经济不平等。
Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 11;21(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01784-3.
6
Prevalence and factors associated with the intention to use contraception among women of reproductive age who are not already using a contraceptive method in Liberia: findings from a secondary analysis of the 2019-2020 Liberia Demographic Health Survey.利比里亚生殖年龄女性中不使用避孕方法者的避孕意愿及其相关因素的流行情况:对 2019-2020 年利比里亚人口健康调查的二次分析结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 6;13(10):e072282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072282.
7
The role of partners, parents and friends in shaping young women's reproductive choices in Peri-urban Nairobi: a qualitative study.在肯尼亚内罗毕的城郊地区,伴侣、父母和朋友在塑造年轻女性生育选择方面的作用:一项定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2023 Mar 9;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01581-4.
8
Transforming masculine norms to improve men's contraceptive acceptance: results from a pilot intervention with men in western Kenya.转变男性规范以提高男性对避孕措施的接受度:来自肯尼亚西部一项针对男性的试点干预的结果。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2170084. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2170084.
9
Validation of the Fertility Norms Scale and Association with Fertility Intention and Contraceptive Use in India.《印度生育规范量表的验证及其与生育意愿和避孕措施使用的关系》。
Stud Fam Plann. 2023 Mar;54(1):39-61. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12227. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
10
Understanding the rise in traditional contraceptive methods use in Uttar Pradesh, India.了解印度北方邦传统避孕方法使用率上升的原因。
Reprod Health. 2023 Jan 6;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01547-y.
处理性别:乌干达北部年轻人在生命历程中再现和改变性别规范的生活经历。
Cult Health Sex. 2019 Apr;21(4):387-403. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2018.1471160. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
4
Four avenues of normative influence: A research agenda for health promotion in low and mid-income countries.四种规范性影响途径:在低收入和中等收入国家促进健康的研究议程。
Health Psychol. 2018 Jun;37(6):562-573. doi: 10.1037/hea0000618. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
5
Factors associated with gender equality among church-going young men in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a cross-sectional study.与金沙萨教会男青年性别平等相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Dec 11;16(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0707-7.
6
Measurement of Social Norms Affecting Modern Contraceptive Use: A Literature Review.测量影响现代避孕措施使用的社会规范:文献综述。
Stud Fam Plann. 2017 Dec;48(4):377-389. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12040. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
7
Maximizing Opportunities: Family Planning and Maternal, Infant, and Young Child Nutrition Integration in Bondo Sub-County, Kenya.最大化机遇:肯尼亚邦多县的计划生育与孕产妇、婴幼儿营养整合
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Oct;21(10):1880-1889. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2341-9.
8
Availability of family planning services and quality of counseling by faith-based organizations: a three country comparative analysis.基于信仰的组织提供的计划生育服务及咨询质量:三国比较分析
Reprod Health. 2017 May 8;14(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0317-2.
9
Barriers to modern contraceptive use in rural areas in DRC.刚果民主共和国农村地区现代避孕方法使用的障碍。
Cult Health Sex. 2017 Sep;19(9):1011-1023. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2017.1286690. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
10
Barriers to Modern Contraceptive Use in Kinshasa, DRC.刚果民主共和国金沙萨现代避孕措施使用的障碍
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167560. eCollection 2016.