Albinet Alexandre, Lanzafame Grazia Maria, Srivastava Deepchandra, Bonnaire Nicolas, Nalin Frederica, Wise Stephen A
Institut National de l'Environnement industriel et des RISques (INERIS), Parc technologique Alata BP2, 60550, Verneuil en Halatte, France.
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), Unité Mixte CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, CEA/Orme des Merisiers, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019 Sep;411(23):5975-5983. doi: 10.1007/s00216-019-02015-6. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) accounts for a significant fraction of particulate matter (PM) in the atmosphere. Source identification, including the SOA fraction, is critical for the effective management of air pollution. Molecular SOA markers (tracers) are key compounds allowing the source apportionment of SOA using different methodologies. Therefore, accurate SOA marker measurements in ambient air PM are important. This study determined the concentrations of 12 key SOA markers (biogenic and anthropogenic) in the urban dust standard reference material available from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (SRM 1649b). Two extraction procedures, sonication and QuEChERS-like (quick easy cheap effective rugged and safe), have been compared. Three research laboratories/institutes using two analytical techniques (gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS)) carried out the analyses. The results obtained were all in good agreement, except for 2-methylerythritol. The analysis of this compound still seems to be challenging by both GC/MS (large injection repeatability) and HPLC/MS-MS (separation issues of both 2-methyltetrols: 2-methylthreitol and 2-methylerythritol). Possible inhomogeneity in the SRM for this compound could also explain the large discrepancies observed. Sonication and QuEChERS-like procedures gave comparable results for the extraction of the SOA markers showing that QuEChERS-like extraction is suitable for the analysis of SOA markers in ambient air PM. As this study provides, for the first time, indicative values in a reference material for typical SOA markers, the analysis of SRM 1649b (urban dust) could be used for quality control/assurance purposes. Graphical abstract.
二次有机气溶胶(SOA)在大气颗粒物(PM)中占相当大的比例。包括SOA部分在内的源识别对于空气污染的有效管理至关重要。分子SOA标记物(示踪剂)是关键化合物,可通过不同方法进行SOA的源分配。因此,准确测量环境空气中PM中的SOA标记物非常重要。本研究测定了美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)提供的城市灰尘标准参考物质(SRM 1649b)中12种关键SOA标记物(生物源和人为源)的浓度。比较了两种提取方法,即超声提取和类似QuEChERS(快速、简单、廉价、有效、耐用且安全)的方法。三个研究实验室/机构使用两种分析技术(气相色谱/质谱联用(GC/MS)和超高压液相色谱/串联质谱联用(HPLC/MS-MS))进行了分析。除2-甲基赤藓糖醇外,所得结果均吻合良好。对于该化合物的分析,GC/MS(进样重复性大)和HPLC/MS-MS(两种2-甲基四醇:2-甲基苏糖醇和2-甲基赤藓糖醇的分离问题)似乎仍具有挑战性。该化合物在标准参考物质中可能存在的不均匀性也可以解释所观察到的巨大差异。超声提取和类似QuEChERS的方法在提取SOA标记物方面给出了可比的结果,表明类似QuEChERS的提取方法适用于分析环境空气中PM中的SOA标记物。由于本研究首次提供了典型SOA标记物在参考物质中的指示值,SRM 1649b(城市灰尘)的分析可用于质量控制/保证目的。图形摘要。