• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药剂师主导、视频刺激反馈减少实习医生处方错误:混合方法评估。

Pharmacist-led, video-stimulated feedback to reduce prescribing errors in doctors-in-training: A mixed methods evaluation.

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.

Exeter Surgical Health Service Research Unit, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;85(10):2405-2413. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14065. Epub 2019 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1111/bcp.14065
PMID:31313340
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6783579/
Abstract

AIMS

To develop and evaluate a feasible, authentic pharmacist-led prescribing feedback intervention for doctors-in-training, to reduce prescribing errors.

METHODS

This was a mixed methods study. Sixteen postgraduate doctors-in training, rotating though the surgical assessment unit of 1 UK hospital, were filmed taking a medication history with a patient and prescribing medications. Each doctor reviewed their video footage and made plans to improve their prescribing, supported by feedback from a pharmacist. Quantitative data in the form of prescribing error prevalence data were collected on 1 day per week before, during and after the intervention period (between November 2015 and March 2017). Qualitative data in the form of individual semi-structured interviews were collected with a subset of participants, to evaluate their experience. Quantitative data were analysed using a statistical process chart and qualitative data were transcribed and analysed thematically.

RESULTS

During the data collection period, 923 patient drug charts were reviewed by pharmacists who identified 1219 prescribing errors overall. Implementation of this feedback approach was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the mean number of prescribing errors, from 19.0/d to 11.7/d (estimated to equate to 38% reduction; P < .0001). Pharmacist-led video-stimulated prescribing feedback was feasible and positively received by participants, who appreciated the reinforcement of good practice as well as the opportunity to reflect on and improve practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Feedback to doctors-in-training tends to be infrequent and often negative, but this feasible feedback strategy significantly reduced prescribing errors and was well received by the target audience as a supportive developmental approach.

摘要

目的

开发并评估一种切实可行、真实可信的以药剂师为主导的针对受训医生的处方反馈干预措施,以减少处方错误。

方法

这是一项混合方法研究。16 名接受培训的住院医师在英国 1 家医院的外科评估病房轮转,他们为 1 名患者采集用药史并开具处方,过程被拍摄下来。每位医生观看自己的录像并制定改进处方的计划,同时接受药剂师的反馈。在干预期间(2015 年 11 月至 2017 年 3 月),每周收集 1 天的定量数据(处方错误发生率数据),并对部分参与者进行个体半结构化访谈,以评估他们的经验。定量数据采用统计过程图进行分析,定性数据采用主题分析方法进行转录和分析。

结果

在数据收集期间,药剂师共审查了 923 份患者药物图表,总共发现了 1219 项处方错误。实施这种反馈方法与处方错误数量的显著减少相关,从平均 19.0 个/天降至 11.7 个/天(估计减少 38%;P<.0001)。以药剂师为主导的视频刺激式处方反馈是可行的,受到参与者的积极欢迎,他们赞赏强化良好实践的机会,以及反思和改进实践的机会。

结论

针对受训医生的反馈往往不够频繁,而且往往是负面的,但这种切实可行的反馈策略显著减少了处方错误,受到目标受众的欢迎,是一种支持性的发展方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8076/6783579/7fd58d9a6e90/BCP-85-2405-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8076/6783579/ccce48f433fb/BCP-85-2405-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8076/6783579/7fd58d9a6e90/BCP-85-2405-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8076/6783579/ccce48f433fb/BCP-85-2405-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8076/6783579/7fd58d9a6e90/BCP-85-2405-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Pharmacist-led, video-stimulated feedback to reduce prescribing errors in doctors-in-training: A mixed methods evaluation.药剂师主导、视频刺激反馈减少实习医生处方错误:混合方法评估。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;85(10):2405-2413. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14065. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
2
Formalized prescribing error feedback from hospital pharmacists: doctors' attitudes and opinions.医院药剂师提供的规范化处方错误反馈:医生的态度和意见
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2015 Dec;76(12):713-8. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2015.76.12.713.
3
Feedback on prescribing errors to junior doctors: exploring views, problems and preferred methods.向初级医生反馈处方错误:探讨观点、问题和首选方法。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Jun;35(3):332-8. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9759-y. Epub 2013 Mar 10.
4
Prevalence, Nature, Severity and Risk Factors for Prescribing Errors in Hospital Inpatients: Prospective Study in 20 UK Hospitals.医院住院患者用药错误的发生率、性质、严重程度及危险因素:英国20家医院的前瞻性研究
Drug Saf. 2015 Sep;38(9):833-43. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0320-x.
5
Evaluating the impact of a pharmacist-led prescribing feedback intervention on prescribing errors in a hospital setting.评价药师主导的处方反馈干预对医院环境下处方错误的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Sep;17(9):1579-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.12.008. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
6
Improving feedback on junior doctors' prescribing errors: mixed-methods evaluation of a quality improvement project.改善对初级医生处方错误的反馈:一项质量改进项目的混合方法评估
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):240-247. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004717. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
7
Exploring the impact of pharmacist-led feedback on prescribing behaviour: A qualitative study.探索药剂师主导的反馈对处方行为的影响:一项定性研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Jun;14(6):545-554. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
8
The impact of implementing a hospital electronic prescribing and administration system on clinical pharmacists' activities - a mixed methods study.实施医院电子处方与给药系统对临床药师工作的影响——一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 12;19(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3986-4.
9
Pharmacist-led, prescription intervention system-assisted feedback to reduce prescribing errors: A retrospective study.药剂师主导、处方干预系统辅助反馈以减少处方错误:一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Dec;46(6):1606-1612. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13491. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
10
A mixed-methods evaluation of the impact of a pharmacist-led feedback pilot intervention on insulin prescribing in a hospital setting.一项混合方法评估,评估药剂师主导的反馈试点干预对医院环境中胰岛素处方的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Nov;17(11):2006-2014. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Pharmacist-Led Training Regarding Medication for Type 2 Diabetes, Based on Patient and Physician Medication-Related Issues Identified in China.基于在中国识别出的患者及医生与用药相关的问题,由药师主导的2型糖尿病用药培训的有效性
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2025 Apr 24;18:1285-1298. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S512518. eCollection 2025.
2
What is the learning effect of video review in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review.视频复习在研究生医学教育中的学习效果:一项系统综述
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06515-7.
3
Evaluating the UK's first national prescribing assessment for GPs in training using an online survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimising feedback for early career professionals: a scoping review and new framework.优化对早期职业专业人员的反馈:范围综述和新框架。
Med Educ. 2019 Apr;53(4):355-368. doi: 10.1111/medu.13794. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
2
Understanding the causes of prescribing errors from a behavioural perspective.从行为学角度理解处方错误的原因。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 May;15(5):546-557. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
3
Understanding the Types and Effects of Clinical Interruptions and Distractions Recorded in a Multihospital Patient Safety Reporting System.
使用在线调查评估英国针对实习全科医生的首次全国处方评估。
BJGP Open. 2023 Dec 19;7(4). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0044. Print 2023 Dec.
4
Can a novel constructivist theory-informed feedback intervention reduce prescribing errors ? A pre-post study.一种新的建构主义理论指导的反馈干预措施能否减少处方错误?一项前后研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 7;23(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04095-6.
5
Learning from electronic prescribing errors: a mixed methods study of junior doctors' perceptions of training and individualised feedback data.从电子处方错误中学习:一项混合方法研究,探讨初级医生对培训和个体化反馈数据的看法。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 22;12(12):e056221. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056221.
6
Improving junior doctor medicine prescribing and patient safety: An intervention using personalised, structured, video-enhanced feedback and deliberate practice.提高初级医生的药物处方水平与患者安全:一项采用个性化、结构化、视频增强反馈及刻意练习的干预措施。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;86(11):2234-2246. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14325. Epub 2020 May 18.
了解多医院患者安全报告系统中记录的临床中断和干扰的类型和影响。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1394-e1400. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000513.
4
Characteristics of interruptions during medication administration: An integrative review of direct observational studies.给药过程中中断的特征:直接观察研究的综合评价。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Oct;27(19-20):3462-3471. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14587. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
Social and professional influences on antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: a realist review.社会和职业因素对实习医生抗菌药物处方行为的影响:一项现实主义综述。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Sep 1;72(9):2418-2430. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx194.
6
'If no-one stops me, I'll make the mistake again': Changing prescribing behaviours through feedback; A Perceptual Control Theory perspective'.“如果没有人阻止我,我还会再犯同样的错误”:通过反馈改变开处方行为;从感知控制理论的角度来看。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Mar;14(3):241-247. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Learning to prescribe through co-working: junior doctors, pharmacists and consultants.通过合作学习开处方:初级医生、药剂师和顾问。
Med Educ. 2017 Apr;51(4):442-451. doi: 10.1111/medu.13227. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
8
Developing junior doctors' prescribing practices through collaborative practice: Sustaining and transforming the practice of communities.通过合作实践培养初级医生的处方习惯:维持和转变社区实践
J Interprof Care. 2017 Mar;31(2):263-272. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1254164. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
9
How prepared are UK medical graduates for practice? A rapid review of the literature 2009-2014.英国医学毕业生的实践准备情况如何?2009-2014 年文献快速复习。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 13;7(1):e013656. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013656.
10
Improving feedback on junior doctors' prescribing errors: mixed-methods evaluation of a quality improvement project.改善对初级医生处方错误的反馈:一项质量改进项目的混合方法评估
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):240-247. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004717. Epub 2016 Apr 4.