The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler.
Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, WI.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Sep 9;152(4):527-536. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz073.
This multicenter study's aim was to assess the performance of two commercially available matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry systems in identifying a challenge collection of clinically relevant nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM).
NTM clinical isolates (n = 244) belonging to 23 species/subspecies were identified by gene sequencing and analyzed using Bruker Biotyper with Mycobacterial Library v5.0.0 and bioMérieux VITEK MS with v3.0 database.
Using the Bruker or bioMérieux systems, 92% and 95% of NTM strains, respectively, were identified at least to the complex/group level; 62% and 57%, respectively, were identified to the highest taxonomic level. Differentiation between members of Mycobacterium abscessus, M fortuitum, M mucogenicum, M avium, and M terrae complexes/groups was problematic for both systems, as was identification of M chelonae for the Bruker system.
Both systems identified most NTM isolates to the group/complex level, and many to the highest taxonomic level. Performance was comparable.
本多中心研究旨在评估两种市售基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱系统在鉴定临床相关非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)挑战集方面的性能。
通过基因测序鉴定属于 23 个种/亚种的 NTM 临床分离株(n=244),并使用 Bruker Biotyper 与 Mycobacterial Library v5.0.0 和 bioMérieux VITEK MS 与 v3.0 数据库进行分析。
使用 Bruker 或 bioMérieux 系统,分别有 92%和 95%的 NTM 菌株至少被鉴定到复合体/群组水平;分别有 62%和 57%被鉴定到最高分类学水平。两个系统都难以区分脓肿分枝杆菌、偶然分枝杆菌、黏液分枝杆菌、鸟分枝杆菌和胞内分枝杆菌复合体/群组的成员,Bruker 系统也难以鉴定龟分枝杆菌。
两个系统都能将大多数 NTM 分离株鉴定到复合体/群组水平,许多分离株能鉴定到最高分类学水平。性能相当。