• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年肾移植受者中阿仑单抗与巴利昔单抗诱导治疗的比较:单中心经验

Comparison of Alemtuzumab Versus Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.

作者信息

Yakubu Idris, Ravichandran Bharath, Sparkes Tracy, Barth Rolf N, Haririan Abdolreza, Masters Brian

机构信息

Pharmacy, 21668University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2021 Apr;34(2):199-206. doi: 10.1177/0897190019850934. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1177/0897190019850934
PMID:31315501
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal choice of induction immunosuppression for elderly kidney transplant recipients remains unclear. Although alemtuzumab has been associated with escalating risk of death and graft loss in this population, this risk has not been adequately explored. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab with basiliximab induction in this population.

METHODS

This is a retrospective matched cohort study of kidney transplant recipients aged ≥65 years. Patients who received alemtuzumab induction were matched (1:2) to a basiliximab control. The primary outcome was allograft survival. The incidence of acute rejection, infection, and all-cause mortality was measured.

RESULTS

Fifty-one and 102 patients were included in the alemtuzumab and basiliximab groups, respectively. Baseline demographics were similar between groups, except for more living donor transplant recipients in the alemtuzumab group (26/51 [51%] vs 31/102 [30.4%], = .02). Acute cellular rejection occurred more frequently within the first year in the basiliximab group ( = .02). There was no difference in rates of infection within the first year. Graft and patient survival rates were similar over the follow-up period. Patients receiving basiliximab had a higher glomerular filtration rate at 2 years posttransplant (59 mL/min/1.73 m vs 49 mL/min/1.73 m, = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab induction is associated with similar outcomes to basiliximab in elderly kidney transplant recipients.

摘要

背景

老年肾移植受者诱导免疫抑制的最佳选择仍不明确。尽管阿仑单抗与该人群中死亡和移植物丢失风险的增加相关,但这一风险尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是比较阿仑单抗与巴利昔单抗在该人群中的安全性和有效性。

方法

这是一项对年龄≥65岁的肾移植受者进行的回顾性匹配队列研究。接受阿仑单抗诱导的患者与巴利昔单抗对照组进行1:2匹配。主要结局是移植肾存活。测量急性排斥反应、感染和全因死亡率的发生率。

结果

阿仑单抗组和巴利昔单抗组分别纳入51例和102例患者。除阿仑单抗组活体供肾移植受者更多外(26/51 [51%] 对31/102 [30.4%],P = 0.02),两组基线人口统计学特征相似。巴利昔单抗组在第一年急性细胞排斥反应更频繁发生(P = 0.02)。第一年感染率无差异。随访期间移植肾和患者存活率相似。接受巴利昔单抗的患者在移植后2年肾小球滤过率更高(59 mL/min/1.73 m²对49 mL/min/1.73 m²,P = 0.03)。

结论

在老年肾移植受者中,阿仑单抗诱导与巴利昔单抗的结局相似。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Alemtuzumab Versus Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.老年肾移植受者中阿仑单抗与巴利昔单抗诱导治疗的比较:单中心经验
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Apr;34(2):199-206. doi: 10.1177/0897190019850934. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
2
Comparative analysis of Basiliximab and Alemtuzumab induction therapies in blood type A2-to-B kidney transplantation: Impact on kidney function and de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies.巴利昔单抗与阿仑单抗诱导疗法在A2血型到B血型肾移植中的比较分析:对肾功能及新生供者特异性HLA抗体的影响
Transpl Immunol. 2023 Dec;81:101958. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101958. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
3
Opportunistic Infections After Induction With Alemtuzumab or Basiliximab: A 3-Year Kidney Transplantation Experience.用阿仑单抗或巴利昔单抗诱导后的机会性感染:3 年肾移植经验。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Apr;53(3):1058-1063. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.08.025. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
4
Basiliximab is associated with a lower incidence of De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies in kidney transplant recipients: A single-center experience.巴利昔单抗与肾移植受者中新发供者特异性 HLA 抗体的较低发生率相关:一项单中心经验。
Transpl Immunol. 2023 Apr;77:101778. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2022.101778. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
5
Alemtuzumab induction and antibody-mediated kidney rejection after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.阿仑单抗诱导与胰肾联合移植后抗体介导的肾排斥反应
Transplantation. 2009 Jan 15;87(1):125-32. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31818c6db0.
6
Alemtuzumab induction and prednisone-free maintenance immunotherapy in kidney transplantation: comparison with basiliximab induction--long-term results.肾移植中阿仑单抗诱导及无泼尼松维持免疫治疗:与巴利昔单抗诱导治疗的比较——长期结果
Am J Transplant. 2005 Oct;5(10):2539-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01067.x.
7
Alemtuzumab-based induction treatment versus basiliximab-based induction treatment in kidney transplantation (the 3C Study): a randomised trial.基于阿仑单抗的诱导治疗与基于巴利昔单抗的诱导治疗在肾移植中的比较(3C 研究):一项随机试验。
Lancet. 2014 Nov 8;384(9955):1684-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61095-3. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
8
Alemtuzumab versus interleukin-2 receptor antibodies induction in living donor kidney transplantation.阿仑单抗与白细胞介素-2 受体抗体诱导在活体供肾移植中的应用。
Transplantation. 2009 Oct 15;88(7):904-10. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b724a5.
9
The Impact of Alemtuzumab and Basiliximab Induction on Patient Survival and Time to Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome in Double Lung Transplantation Recipients.阿仑单抗和巴利昔单抗诱导治疗对双肺移植受者生存及闭塞性细支气管炎综合征发生时间的影响
Am J Transplant. 2016 Aug;16(8):2334-41. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13739. Epub 2016 May 23.
10
Thymoglobulin Versus Basiliximab Induction Therapy in Low-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.低风险肾移植受者中胸腺球蛋白与巴利昔单抗诱导治疗的单中心经验
Transplant Proc. 2018 Jun;50(5):1285-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.088.

引用本文的文献

1
Positive Patient Postoperative Outcomes with Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review including Perioperative-Specialty Pharmacist Interviews.药物治疗实现患者术后良好结局:一项包括围手术期专科药师访谈的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 24;11(19):5628. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195628.
2
The Impact of Different Induction Immunosuppressive Therapy on Long-Term Kidney Transplant Function When Measured by Iothalamate Clearance.以碘他拉酸盐清除率衡量不同诱导免疫抑制疗法对肾移植长期功能的影响。
J Clin Med Res. 2020 Dec;12(12):787-793. doi: 10.14740/jocmr4369. Epub 2020 Dec 18.