Stockton Winifred M, Nguyen Theresa, Zhang Lishi, Dowling Thomas C
Children's Hospital of Orange County, Department of Pharmacy, Orange, CA, USA.
Biostatistics, Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020 Mar;26(2):397-405. doi: 10.1177/1078155219858390. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Etoposide is critical in treating pediatric cancers, although hypersensitivity can be severe and treatment-limiting. Reported rates of hypersensitivity range from 2% to 51%. Hypersensitivity data for etoposide phosphate, a newer product, are lacking. The primary objective of this study was to assess etoposide and etoposide phosphate hypersensitivity incidence. Secondary objectives included evaluation of potential risk factors for hypersensitivity and strategies to prevent recurrence.
This retrospective cohort study evaluated pediatric patients who received initial etoposide phosphate or etoposide dose between August 2012 and July 2017. The primary outcome was documentation of hypersensitivity within four months of initial dose. Potential risk factors evaluated included age, allergies, dose, infusion rate, infusion concentration, and premedication.
Of 246 patients, hypersensitivity reactions occurred in five of 54 patients (9.3%) who received etoposide phosphate and 52 of 192 patients (27.1%) who received etoposide ( = 0.0061). For etoposide, the mean initial infusion rate was 64.6 ± 40.9 mg/m/h for patients with hypersensitivity and 49.5 ± 33.4 mg/m/h without hypersensitivity ( = 0.0886). Etoposide phosphate rate was not associated with hypersensitivity. Recurrent hypersensitivity occurred in one of nine patients (11.1%) who received etoposide desensitization and one of 38 patients (2.6%) who changed formulation to etoposide phosphate.
Etoposide was associated with more hypersensitivity than etoposide phosphate in pediatric patients. Etoposide hypersensitivity was associated with higher infusion rates, but not etoposide phosphate. Differences in hypersensitivity incidence and infusion rate influence indicate a formulation-effect. Etoposide hypersensitivity recurrence may be prevented by changing to etoposide phosphate formulation. During etoposide phosphate shortages, etoposide desensitization may prevent recurrent hypersensitivity.
依托泊苷在治疗儿童癌症方面至关重要,尽管超敏反应可能很严重且限制治疗。报道的超敏反应发生率在2%至51%之间。关于较新产品磷酸依托泊苷的超敏反应数据尚缺。本研究的主要目的是评估依托泊苷和磷酸依托泊苷的超敏反应发生率。次要目的包括评估超敏反应的潜在风险因素以及预防复发的策略。
这项回顾性队列研究评估了2012年8月至2017年7月期间接受初始剂量磷酸依托泊苷或依托泊苷的儿科患者。主要结局是初始剂量后四个月内超敏反应的记录。评估的潜在风险因素包括年龄、过敏史、剂量、输注速率、输注浓度和预处理。
在246例患者中,接受磷酸依托泊苷的54例患者中有5例(9.3%)发生超敏反应,接受依托泊苷的192例患者中有52例(27.1%)发生超敏反应(P = 0.0061)。对于依托泊苷,发生超敏反应的患者初始平均输注速率为64.6±40.9mg/m²/h,未发生超敏反应的患者为49.5±33.4mg/m²/h(P = 0.0886)。磷酸依托泊苷的发生率与超敏反应无关。接受依托泊苷脱敏治疗的9例患者中有1例(11.1%)发生复发性超敏反应,改用磷酸依托泊苷制剂的38例患者中有1例(2.6%)发生复发性超敏反应。
在儿科患者中,依托泊苷比磷酸依托泊苷与更多的超敏反应相关。依托泊苷超敏反应与较高的输注速率相关,但磷酸依托泊苷并非如此。超敏反应发生率和输注速率影响的差异表明存在制剂效应。改用磷酸依托泊苷制剂可预防依托泊苷超敏反应复发。在磷酸依托泊苷短缺期间,依托泊苷脱敏治疗可预防复发性超敏反应。