Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Universität Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Marburg; Clinica Trials Coordination Center (KKS), Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg.
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019 May 24;116(21):365-371. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0365.
Superficial wound infections after gastrointestinal surgery markedly impair the affected patients' quality of life. As it is still unknown which method of skin closure is best for the reduction of wound infections in elective gastrointestinal sur- gery, we compared the frequency of wound infections after intracutaneous suturing versus skin stapling.
In a prospective, randomized, single-center study, patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery were intraoperatively randomized to skin closure either with an intracutaneous suture or with staples. The primary endpoint-the occurrence of a grade A1 wound infection within 30 days of surgery-was evaluated according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Out of a total of 280 patients, 141 were randomized to intracutaneous suturing and 139 to stapling. The groups did not differ significantly with respect to age, sex, or ASA classification. 19 of the 141 patients in the intracutaneous suturing group (13.5%) had a grade A1 wound infection, compared with 23 of 139 in the stapling group (16.6%) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.79; 95% confidence interval: [0.41; 1.52]; p = 0.47). A multiple regression analysis revealed that the type of surgery (colorectal vs. other), the approach, and the incision length were independent risk factors for a grade A1 wound infection. When wound dehiscences were additionally considered, wound complications were found to have arisen significantly more often in the stapling group than in the intracutaneous suturing group (16.3% [23/141] versus 30.2% [42/139], OR: 0.45 [0.25; 0.80]; p = 0.006).
In elective gastrointestinal surgery, intracutaneous suturing was not found to be associated with a lower rate of superficial wound infections than skin stapling, but fewer wound dehiscences occurred in the intracutaneous suturing group.
胃肠道手术后的浅表伤口感染显著降低了受影响患者的生活质量。由于目前尚不清楚哪种皮肤闭合方法最适合减少择期胃肠道手术中的伤口感染,我们比较了皮内缝合与皮肤钉合减少伤口感染的效果。
在一项前瞻性、随机、单中心研究中,择期行胃肠手术的患者术中随机接受皮内缝合或皮肤钉合。主要终点是术后 30 天内 A1 级伤口感染的发生情况,根据意向治疗原则进行评估。
在总共 280 例患者中,141 例随机分为皮内缝合组,139 例随机分为皮肤钉合组。两组在年龄、性别或 ASA 分级方面无显著差异。皮内缝合组 141 例患者中有 19 例(13.5%)发生 A1 级伤口感染,而皮肤钉合组 139 例患者中有 23 例(16.6%)(比值比[OR]:0.79;95%置信区间:[0.41;1.52];p=0.47)。多因素回归分析显示,手术类型(结直肠 vs. 其他)、手术入路和切口长度是 A1 级伤口感染的独立危险因素。当进一步考虑伤口裂开时,发现皮肤钉合组的伤口并发症发生率明显高于皮内缝合组(16.3%[141 例中的 23 例]与 30.2%[139 例中的 42 例],OR:0.45[0.25;0.80];p=0.006)。
在择期胃肠道手术中,皮内缝合与皮肤钉合相比,并未发现浅表伤口感染发生率更低,但皮内缝合组的伤口裂开发生率更低。