Agostino Camila Silveira, Zana Yossi, Balci Fuat, Claessens Peter M E
Department of Biological Psychology, Faculty of Natural Science, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Center for Mathematics, Computing and Cognition, Federal University of ABC, Santo André, Brazil.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 28;10:1479. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01479. eCollection 2019.
Investigations in the temporal estimation domain are quite vast in the range of milliseconds, seconds, and minutes. This study aimed to determine the psychophysical function that best describes long-range time interval estimation and evaluate the effect of numerals in duration presentation on the form of this function. Participants indicated on a line the magnitude of time intervals presented either as a number + time-unit (e.g., "9 months"; Group I), unitless numerals (e.g., "9"; Group II), or tagged future personal events (e.g., "Wedding"; Group III). The horizontal line was labeled rightward ("Very short" = >"Very long") or leftward ("Very long" = >"Very short") for Group I and II, but only rightward for Group III. None of the linear, power, logistic or logarithmic functions provided the best fit to the individual participant data in more than 50% of participants for any group. Individual power exponents were different only between the tagged personal events (Group III) and the other two groups. When the same analysis was repeated for the aggregated data, power functions provided a better fit than other tested functions in all groups with a difference in the power function parameters again between the tagged personal events and the other groups. A non-linear mixed effects analysis indicated a difference in the power function exponent between Group III and the other groups, but not between Group I and II. No effect of scale directionality was found in neither of the experiments in which scale direction was included as independent variable. These results suggest that the judgment of intervals in a number + time-unit presentation invoke, at least in part, processing mechanisms other than those used for time-domain. Consequently, we propose the use of event-tagged assessment for characterizing long-range interval representation. We also recommend that analyses in this field should not be restricted to aggregated data given the qualitative variation between participants.
在时间估计领域,研究范围涵盖了从毫秒、秒到分钟的广阔区间。本研究旨在确定最能描述长时距估计的心理物理函数,并评估时长呈现中的数字对该函数形式的影响。参与者在一条线上指出以数字 + 时间单位(例如,“9个月”;第一组)、无单位数字(例如,“9”;第二组)或带有标记的未来个人事件(例如,“婚礼”;第三组)呈现的时间间隔的大小。对于第一组和第二组,水平线上的标签从右到左(“非常短” => “非常长”)或从左到右(“非常长” => “非常短”),但对于第三组仅从右到左。对于任何一组,线性、幂函数、逻辑函数或对数函数均未在超过50%的参与者中为个体参与者数据提供最佳拟合。个体幂指数仅在带有标记的个人事件组(第三组)和其他两组之间有所不同。当对汇总数据重复相同分析时,幂函数在所有组中比其他测试函数提供了更好的拟合,并且在带有标记的个人事件组与其他组之间幂函数参数再次存在差异。非线性混合效应分析表明第三组与其他组之间幂函数指数存在差异,但第一组和第二组之间没有差异。在将量表方向作为自变量纳入的两个实验中,均未发现量表方向性的影响。这些结果表明,以数字 + 时间单位呈现的时间间隔判断至少部分地调用了除用于时域的处理机制之外的其他机制。因此,我们建议使用带有事件标记的评估来表征长时距表征。我们还建议,鉴于参与者之间的定性差异,该领域的分析不应局限于汇总数据。