Suppr超能文献

血栓抽吸适用于哪些人?

To Whom Thrombus Aspiration May Concern?

作者信息

Samy Mohamed, Nassar Yaser, Mohamed Abo Hamila, Omar Walid, Elghawaby Helmy

机构信息

Critical Care Department, Cairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Jun 16;7(11):1774-1781. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.546. eCollection 2019 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thrombus aspiration for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may improve myocardial perfusion. However, these favourable results called into a question by data indicating not only a lack of efficacy but a risk of potentially deleterious complications.

AIM

To assess the effect of thrombus aspiration during the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) on procedural angiographic results, stent characteristics, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

METHODS

All consecutive STEMI patients candidate for PPCI and admitted to Critical Care Department, Cairo University hospitals, managed either by thrombectomy before primary PCI (if thrombus score ≥ 3) or conventional PPCI, Six hundred seven subjects were enrolled in the study divided into Group with thrombectomy before PPCI (107 subjects, 18%), and group with Conventional PCI (500 subjects, 82%). ST-segment resolution, peak CK-MB, TIMI score, thrombus score, and MBG were assessed; stent number, diameter, length and stented segment were reported and follow up MACCE was reported (in hospital and 1-year post-intervention).

RESULTS

Mean values for peak CKMB were less in thrombectomy group (228 ± 174 I/U vs 269 ± 186 I/U, p = 0.04), ST segment resolution ≥ 70% occurred in {63 subjects (58.9%) vs 233 (46.6%), p = 0.001} in thrombectomy vs conventional group respectively. TIMI score pre procedure was zero in (102 subjects (95%) vs 402 (80.4%), p = 0.001), while TIMI III post procedure was reported in (100 subjects (93.4%) vs 437 (87%), p = 0.06), MBG mean values were (2.4 ± 0.6 vs 2.0 ± 1, p = 0.001), thrombus score was higher in thrombectomy group (4.6 ± 0.4 vs 0.8 ± 1.7, p = 0.001) in thrombectomy vs conventional group respectively. Direct stenting was { 34 patients (31%) vs 102 patients (20%), p = 0.05}, mean stent diameter (2.7 ± 1.3 mm vs 3.5 ± 1.3 mm, p = 0.3), mean stent length was (19.9 mm ± 10 versus 22.7 mm ± 8 in p 0.01). mean stent number was (1.0 ± 0.5 vs 1.2 ± 0.6, p = 0.001), mean stented segment was (22.5 ± 13.5 vs 28.5 ± 15.2 mm, p = 0.001) in thrombectomy vs conventional group respectively. MACCE in hospital were reported in {9 subjects (8.4%) vs 70 (14%), p = 0.07)}. Follow up MACCE after 1 year reported in {6 subjects (5.6 %) vs 80 (16 %), p 0.= 4} in thrombectomy vs conventional group respectively.

CONCLUSION

Thrombus aspiration before primary PCI (in a selected group with thrombus score ≥ 3) improves myocardial perfusion, suggested by better ST-segment resolution, TIMI flow, less peak CKMB and MBG, associated with a higher rate of direct stenting, shorter stent length, stented segments and less number of stents. Although thrombus aspiration was done in more risky patients (higher thrombus score) MACCE (in hospital and 1 year follow up) showed no statistical difference.

摘要

背景

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者进行血栓抽吸可能会改善心肌灌注。然而,这些有利结果受到质疑,因为有数据表明不仅缺乏疗效,而且存在潜在有害并发症的风险。

目的

评估在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)期间进行血栓抽吸对手术血管造影结果、支架特性以及主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)的影响。

方法

所有连续的适合 PPCI 且入住开罗大学医院重症监护科的 STEMI 患者,根据血栓评分≥3 在直接 PCI 前进行血栓切除术或采用传统 PPCI 进行治疗。607 名受试者被纳入研究,分为 PPCI 前进行血栓切除术组(107 名受试者,18%)和传统 PCI 组(500 名受试者,82%)。评估 ST 段回落、肌酸激酶同工酶峰值(CK-MB)、心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)评分、血栓评分和心肌 blush 分级(MBG);报告支架数量、直径、长度和支架植入节段,并报告随访期间的 MACCE(住院期间和干预后 1 年)。

结果

血栓切除术组的 CKMB 峰值平均值较低(228±174 I/U 对比 与 269±186 I/U,p = 0.04),血栓切除术组和传统组中 ST 段回落≥70%的发生率分别为{63 名受试者(58.9%)对比 233 名(46.6%),p = 0.001}。术前 TIMI 评分为零的患者在两组中的比例分别为(102 名受试者(95%)对比 402 名(80.4%),p = 0.001),术后 TIMI 3 级血流的患者比例分别为(100 名受试者(93.4%)对比 437 名(87%),p = 0.06),MBG 平均值分别为(2.4±0.6 对比 2.0±1,p = 0.001),血栓切除术组的血栓评分更高(4.6±0.4 对比 0.8±1.7,p = 0.001)。直接支架植入率分别为{34 例患者(31%)对比 102 例患者(20%),p = 0.05},平均支架直径(2.7±1.3 mm 对比 3.5±1.3 mm,p = 0.3),平均支架长度分别为(19.9 mm±10 对比 22.7 mm±8,p = 0.01)。平均支架数量分别为(1.0±0.5 对比 1.2±0.6,p = 0.001),平均支架植入节段分别为(22.5±13.5 对比 28.5±15.2 mm,p = 0.001)。住院期间 MACCE 的发生率分别为{9 名受试者(8.4%)对比 70 名(14%),p = 0.07}。血栓切除术组和传统组在 1 年后随访的 MACCE 发生率分别为{6名受试者(5.6%)对比 80 名(16%),p = 0.04}。

结论

在直接 PCI 前(在血栓评分≥3 的选定组中)进行血栓抽吸可改善心肌灌注,表现为更好的 ST 段回落、TIMI 血流、更低的 CKMB 峰值和 MBG,同时直接支架植入率更高、支架长度更短、支架植入节段更少且支架数量更少。尽管血栓抽吸是在风险更高的患者(血栓评分更高)中进行,但 MACCE(住院期间和 1 年随访)无统计学差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d537/6614264/2f4d8220f070/OAMJMS-7-1774-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验