Suppr超能文献

松果体手术的幕上和幕下入路:一项数据库分析

Supratentorial and Infratentorial Approaches to Pineal Surgery: A Database Analysis.

作者信息

Rosenberg David M, Geever Brett W, Patel Akash S, Chaker Anisse N, Bhimani Abhiraj D, Kheirkhah Pouyan, Hobbs Jonathan G, Esfahani Darian R, Mehta Ankit I

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.

Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States.

出版信息

J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019 Aug;80(4):364-370. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675231. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

Abstract

Neoplasms involving the pineal gland are rare. When they do occur, tumor resection is anatomically challenging and is traditionally addressed by either a supratentorial or an infratentorial approach. To date, no large, multicenter studies have been performed that systematically analyze outcomes comparing these two approaches. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes for patients undergoing pineal neoplasm resection, comparing supratentorial and infratentorial approaches.  Retrospective database review.  Multi-institutional database.  From 2005 to 2016, 60 patients were identified, with 13 undergoing a supratentorial approach and 47 undergoing an infratentorial approach.  Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were investigated using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Demographics, readmission, reoperation, and complication rates were analyzed and compared with previous studies.  Patient demographics were similar between these two groups. The overall complication rates for the supratentorial and infratentorial approaches were 30.8 and 17%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant. The most common medical complications encountered were respiratory and hematological.  As the first multi-institutional database analysis of approaches to the pineal gland, this study provides an analysis of patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. After controlling for preoperative risk factors and demographic characteristics, no statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes were found between infratentorial and supratentorial approaches. The mean readmission, reoperation, and complication rates were found to be 2.1, 8.3, and 20%, respectively. The lack of significant difference between approaches suggests that clinical decision-making should depend upon anatomical considerations and physician preference, although the complications illustrated here may provide some preoperative guidance.

摘要

累及松果体的肿瘤较为罕见。当这类肿瘤发生时,肿瘤切除在解剖学上具有挑战性,传统上可通过经幕上或经幕下入路进行处理。迄今为止,尚未开展大规模的多中心研究来系统分析比较这两种入路的治疗效果。本研究旨在评估接受松果体肿瘤切除术的患者的治疗效果,比较经幕上和经幕下入路。

  • 回顾性数据库分析。

  • 多机构数据库。

  • 2005年至2016年,共识别出60例患者,其中13例采用经幕上入路,47例采用经幕下入路。

  • 使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库调查患者的人口统计学特征、合并症及术后30天的治疗效果。分析人口统计学特征、再入院率、再次手术率及并发症发生率,并与既往研究进行比较。

  • 两组患者的人口统计学特征相似。经幕上和经幕下入路的总体并发症发生率分别为30.8%和17%,差异无统计学意义。最常见的内科并发症为呼吸和血液系统并发症。

  • 作为第一项关于松果体入路的多机构数据库分析,本研究对患者的人口统计学特征、合并症及术后并发症进行了分析。在控制术前危险因素和人口统计学特征后,经幕下和经幕上入路在术后治疗效果方面未发现统计学上的显著差异。再入院率、再次手术率及并发症发生率的均值分别为2.1%、8.3%和20%。两种入路之间缺乏显著差异表明,临床决策应取决于解剖学因素和医生的偏好,尽管此处所示的并发症可能提供一些术前指导。

相似文献

1
Supratentorial and Infratentorial Approaches to Pineal Surgery: A Database Analysis.松果体手术的幕上和幕下入路:一项数据库分析
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019 Aug;80(4):364-370. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675231. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
10
Characterization of Pediatric Infratentorial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.
Neurosurgery. 2024 Nov 1;95(5):1064-1071. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002977. Epub 2024 May 3.

本文引用的文献

2
Epidural Abscess: A Propensity Analysis of Surgical Treatment Strategies.硬膜外脓肿:手术治疗策略的倾向性分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Dec 15;43(24):E1479-E1485. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002747.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验