Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 1;188(10):1849-1857. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz161.
Household surveys remain an essential method for estimating vaccine coverage in developing countries. However, the resulting estimates have inevitable and currently unmeasurable information biases due to inaccuracies in recall, low retention of home-based records (HBRs; i.e., vaccination cards), and inaccurate recording of vaccination on HBRs. We developed an innovative method with which to overcome these biases, enhance the validity of survey results, and estimate true vaccine coverage using nested serological assessments of immune markers. We enrolled children aged 12-23 months in vaccine coverage surveys in Karachi, Pakistan, from January to December 2016. Vaccination history was collected through verbal recall by the caregiver and, when available, by HBR. One-third of survey participants were randomly enrolled for serological testing for anti-measles virus immunoglobulin G antibody. We applied Bayesian latent class models to evaluate the misalignment among measles vaccination histories derived by recall, HBRs, and measles serology and estimated true measles vaccine coverage. The model-based estimate of true measles vaccine coverage was 61.1% (95% credible interval: 53.5, 69.4) among all survey participants. The standard estimate of 73.2% (95% confidence interval: 71.3, 75.1) defined by positive recall or HBR documentation substantially overestimated the vaccine coverage. Researchers can correct for information biases using serological assessments in a subsample of survey participants and latent class analytical approaches.
家庭调查仍然是发展中国家估计疫苗覆盖率的一种重要方法。然而,由于回忆不准确、家庭记录(即疫苗接种卡)保存率低以及家庭记录上疫苗接种记录不准确,由此产生的估计存在不可避免且目前无法衡量的信息偏差。我们开发了一种创新方法,可以克服这些偏差,提高调查结果的有效性,并使用嵌套血清学评估免疫标志物来估计真实的疫苗覆盖率。我们于 2016 年 1 月至 12 月在巴基斯坦卡拉奇的疫苗覆盖率调查中招募了 12-23 个月大的儿童。通过照顾者的口头回忆和(如有)家庭记录收集疫苗接种史。三分之一的调查参与者随机接受麻疹病毒免疫球蛋白 G 抗体血清学检测。我们应用贝叶斯潜在类别模型来评估通过回忆、家庭记录和麻疹血清学得出的麻疹疫苗接种史之间的不匹配,并估计真实的麻疹疫苗覆盖率。在所有调查参与者中,基于模型的真实麻疹疫苗覆盖率估计为 61.1%(95%可信区间:53.5,69.4)。由阳性回忆或家庭记录文件定义的标准估计值 73.2%(95%置信区间:71.3,75.1)大大高估了疫苗覆盖率。研究人员可以通过对调查参与者的血清学评估和潜在类别分析方法进行亚样本校正来纠正信息偏差。