• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2005 年至 2017 年的药品生产厂家数量和仿制药价格。

Number of manufacturers and generic drug pricing from 2005 to 2017.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St, 637 Salk Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jul;25(7):348-352.

PMID:31318508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6734551/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate how changes in generic drug prices and the incidence of abrupt price increases varied with the number of manufacturers supplying each drug.

STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of 2005 to 2016 monthly wholesale acquisition costs (WACs) and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health Plan counts of pharmacy claims for National Drug Codes (NDCs) for generic drugs.

METHODS

Each year, NDCs were categorized according to the number of manufacturers offering each combination of active ingredient and dosage form: 1 to 3, 4 to 7, and more than 7. For every month from January 2006 to January 2017, we estimated the 12-month change in WAC (eg, 12-month change in January 2006 was calculated as the difference in WAC between January 2006 and January 2005, divided by the WAC in January 2005), before and after weighting each NDC by counts of pharmacy claims. We evaluated the proportion of NDCs that had large price increases, greater than 20%, 50%, 100%, and 500% within a year.

RESULTS

Before 2010, price changes were higher for drugs supplied by a lower number of manufacturers; however, after 2010, prices increased sharply, and drugs supplied by 4 to 7 manufacturers showed increases similar to or higher than those supplied by 1 to 3. In 2013, prices increased by an average of 29% for drugs supplied by 1 to 3 and 4 to 7 manufacturers, and 10% for more than 7. Price changes increased after weighting by counts of pharmacy claims, demonstrating that price increases disproportionately affected widely used drugs. The proportion of NDCs from drugs supplied by 1 to 3 manufacturers that doubled in price within a year was 3.6 times higher in 2012 to 2015 than in 2005 to 2009 (4.6% vs 1.3%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Increases in generic drug prices are concerning because they affected widely used drugs and suggest that generic drug prices may be increasingly insensitive to competition.

摘要

目的

评估药品通用名价格变化和大幅涨价发生率随供应每种药物的制造商数量变化的情况。

研究设计

对 2005 年至 2016 年每月药品批发采购成本(WAC)和匹兹堡大学医学中心健康计划的药品通用名(NDC)药房配药数量进行分析。

方法

每年根据每种活性成分和剂型组合的制造商数量对 NDC 进行分类:1 至 3 个、4 至 7 个和 7 个以上。对于 2006 年 1 月至 2017 年 1 月的每个月,我们根据药房配药数量对 WAC 的 12 个月变化进行估计(例如,2006 年 1 月的 12 个月变化是通过 2006 年 1 月与 2005 年 1 月的 WAC 之间的差异除以 2005 年 1 月的 WAC 得出的),然后对每个 NDC 进行加权。我们评估了一年内价格涨幅超过 20%、50%、100%和 500%的 NDC 比例。

结果

2010 年前,供应药物的制造商数量越少,价格变化幅度越大;然而,2010 年后,价格急剧上涨,供应 4 至 7 个制造商的药物的涨幅与供应 1 至 3 个制造商的药物涨幅相似或更高。2013 年,供应 1 至 3 个和 4 至 7 个制造商的药物价格平均上涨 29%,供应 7 个以上制造商的药物价格上涨 10%。经过药房配药数量加权后,价格变化更大,表明价格上涨不成比例地影响了广泛使用的药物。2012 年至 2015 年,供应 1 至 3 个制造商的 NDC 价格翻倍的比例是 2005 年至 2009 年的 3.6 倍(分别为 4.6%和 1.3%)。

结论

通用名药品价格上涨令人担忧,因为它们影响了广泛使用的药品,这表明通用名药品价格可能对竞争的敏感度越来越低。

相似文献

1
Number of manufacturers and generic drug pricing from 2005 to 2017.2005 年至 2017 年的药品生产厂家数量和仿制药价格。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jul;25(7):348-352.
2
Association Between Market Competition and Prices of Generic Topical Dermatology Drugs.市场竞争与皮肤科外用药品通用名药物价格的关联。
JAMA Dermatol. 2018 Dec 1;154(12):1441-1446. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3798.
3
OSTEOPOROSIS DRUGS MARKETED IN THE UNITED STATES: GENERIC COMPETITION, PRICING STRUCTURE, AND DISPERSION AMONG PAYERS.在美国销售的骨质疏松症药物:仿制药竞争、定价结构及支付方之间的差异
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(6):385-392. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000623. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
4
The impact of alternative pricing methods for drugs in California Workers' Compensation System: Fee-schedule pricing.加利福尼亚工人赔偿系统中药物替代定价方法的影响:按目录定价。
PLoS One. 2018 May 25;13(5):e0197449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197449. eCollection 2018.
5
Do generics offer significant savings to the UK National Health Service?仿制药能为英国国民医疗服务体系大幅节省开支吗?
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jan;23(1):105-16. doi: 10.1185/030079907X159506.
6
Changes in Drug List Prices and Amounts Paid by Patients and Insurers.药品目录价格和患者及保险公司支付金额的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2028510. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28510.
7
Trends in Pricing and Generic Competition Within the Oral Antibiotic Drug Market in the United States.美国口服抗生素药物市场的定价趋势和仿制药竞争
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 13;65(11):1848-1852. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix634.
8
Increased topical generic prices by manufacturers.生产商提高了局部通用药物的价格。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 May;80(5):1353-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
9
Trends in Prices of Popular Brand-Name Prescription Drugs in the United States.美国热门品牌处方药价格趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e194791. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.4791.
10
A comparison of generic drug prices in seven European countries: a methodological analysis.七个欧洲国家仿制药价格比较:方法学分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2184-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Antifungal drug price increases in the United States, 2000-2019.美国抗真菌药物价格上涨,2000-2019 年。
Mycoses. 2022 Sep;65(9):859-865. doi: 10.1111/myc.13486. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

1
The Contribution Of New Product Entry Versus Existing Product Inflation In The Rising Costs Of Drugs.新药上市与现有药品涨价对药品成本上升的贡献。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jan;38(1):76-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05147.
2
Changes in Drug Pricing After Drug Shortages in the United States.美国药品短缺后药品价格的变化。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):74-76. doi: 10.7326/M18-1137. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
3
Addressing the Lack of Competition in Generic Drugs to Improve Healthcare Quality and Safety.解决仿制药缺乏竞争问题,以提高医疗质量和安全。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):2005-2007. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4548-x. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
4
Pricing of monoclonal antibody therapies: higher if used for cancer?单克隆抗体疗法的定价:用于癌症时是否更高?
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Feb;24(2):109-112.
5
Prices of Generic Drugs Associated with Numbers of Manufacturers.与制造商数量相关的仿制药价格。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Dec 28;377(26):2597-2598. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1711899.
6
High Generic Drug Prices and Market Competition: A Retrospective Cohort Study.高通用药品价格与市场竞争:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 1;167(3):145-151. doi: 10.7326/M16-1432. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
7
Patent watch: the patent cliff steepens.专利观察:专利悬崖日益陡峭。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011 Jan;10(1):12-3. doi: 10.1038/nrd3356.