Suppr超能文献

保险公司对管理式医疗价值保险设计模式的看法。

Insurers' perspectives on MA value-based insurance design model.

机构信息

RAND Corporation, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90401. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jul 1;25(7):e198-e203.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Value-based insurance design (VBID) lowers cost sharing for high-value healthcare services that are clinically beneficial to patients with certain conditions. In 2017, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation began a voluntary VBID model test in Medicare Advantage (MA). This article describes insurers' perspectives on the MA VBID model, explores perceived barriers to joining this model, and describes ways to address participation barriers.

STUDY DESIGN

A descriptive, qualitative study.

METHODS

In spring/summer 2017, we conducted semistructured interviews with 24 representatives of 10 nonparticipating MA insurers to learn why they did not join the model test. We interviewed 73 representatives of 8 VBID-participating insurers about their participation decisions and implementation experiences. All interview data were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Fewer than 30% of eligible insurers participated in the first 2 years of the model test. The main barriers to entry were a perceived lack of information on VBID in MA, an expectation of low return on investment, concerns over administrative and information technology (IT) hurdles, and model design parameters. Most VBID participants encountered administrative and IT hurdles but overcame them. CMS made changes to the model parameters to increase the uptake.

CONCLUSIONS

The model uptake was low, and implementation challenges and concerns over VBID effectiveness in the Medicare population were important factors in participation decisions. To increase uptake, CMS could consider providing in-kind implementation assistance to model participants. Nonparticipants may want to incorporate lessons learned from current participants, and insurers should engage their IT departments/vendors early on.

摘要

目的

基于价值的保险设计(VBID)降低了对具有某些条件的患者具有临床益处的高价值医疗服务的自付费用。2017 年,医疗保险和医疗补助创新中心(Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation)开始在医疗保险优势计划(Medicare Advantage,MA)中进行自愿 VBID 模型测试。本文介绍了保险公司对 MA VBID 模型的看法,探讨了加入该模型的障碍,并描述了克服参与障碍的方法。

研究设计

描述性、定性研究。

方法

2017 年春/夏季,我们对半参与 MA 模型测试的 10 家非参与保险公司的 24 名代表进行了半结构化访谈,以了解他们不参与模型测试的原因。我们对 8 家参与 VBID 的保险公司的 73 名代表进行了访谈,了解他们的参与决策和实施经验。所有访谈数据均进行了主题分析。

结果

在模型测试的前 2 年,只有不到 30%的合格保险公司参与。进入的主要障碍是缺乏 MA 中 VBID 的信息、对投资回报率低的预期、对行政和信息技术(IT)障碍的担忧以及对模型设计参数的担忧。大多数 VBID 参与者都遇到了行政和 IT 障碍,但都克服了这些障碍。CMS 对模型参数进行了更改,以提高采用率。

结论

模型采用率较低,实施挑战以及对 VBID 在 Medicare 人群中有效性的担忧是参与决策的重要因素。为了提高采用率,CMS 可以考虑向模型参与者提供实物实施援助。非参与者可能希望从当前参与者那里吸取经验教训,并且保险公司应该尽早与他们的 IT 部门/供应商合作。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验