Jiménez-Ubieto Ana, Grande Carlos, Caballero Dolores, Yáñez Lucrecia, Novelli Silvana, Hernández-Garcia Miguel Teodoro, Manzanares María, Arranz Reyes, Ferreiro José Javier, Bobillo Sabela, Mercadal Santiago, Galeo Andrea, Jiménez Javier López, Moraleda José M, Vallejo Carlos, Albo Carmen, Pérez Elena, Marrero Carmen, Magnano Laura, Palomera Luis, Jarque Isidro, Rodriguez Antonia, Lorza Leyre, Martín Alejandro, Coria Erika, López-Guillermo Armando, Salar Antonio, José Lahuerta Juan
Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario, 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2019 Dec;12(4):194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) with early therapy failure (ETF) within 2 years of frontline therapy have poor overall survival (OS). We recently reported the results of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients from the Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplantes de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO) registry treated with rituximab prior to ASCT and with ETF after first-line immunochemotherapy, leading to 81% 5-year OS since ASCT. We explored whether ASCT is also an effective option in the pre-rituximab era-that is, in patients treated in induction and rescued only with chemotherapy.
ETF was defined as relapse/progression within 2 years of starting first-line therapy. We identified two groups: the ETF cohort (n = 87) and the non-ETF cohort (n = 47 patients receiving ASCT but not experiencing ETF following first-line therapy).
There was a significant difference in 5-year progression-free survival between the ETF and non-ETF cohorts (43% vs. 57%, respectively; p = .048). Nevertheless, in patients with ETF with an interval from first relapse after primary treatment to ASCT of <1 year, no differences were observed in 5-year progression-free survival (48% vs. 66%, respectively; p = .44) or in 5-year OS (69% vs. 77%, p = .4). Patients in the ETF cohort transplanted in complete remission showed a plateau in the OS curves, at 56%, beyond 13.7 years of follow-up.
ASCT may be a curative option for ETF in patients who respond to rescue chemotherapy, without the need for immunotherapy or other therapies, and should be considered as an early consolidation, especially in patients with difficult access to rituximab.
目的/背景:在一线治疗2年内出现早期治疗失败(ETF)的滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者总生存期(OS)较差。我们最近报告了西班牙淋巴瘤与骨髓移植研究组(GELTAMO)登记处的患者接受自体干细胞移植(ASCT)的结果,这些患者在ASCT前接受了利妥昔单抗治疗,且在一线免疫化疗后出现ETF,自ASCT以来5年总生存率为81%。我们探讨了在利妥昔单抗时代之前,ASCT是否也是一种有效的选择,即在仅接受化疗诱导和挽救治疗的患者中。
ETF定义为一线治疗开始后2年内复发/进展。我们确定了两组:ETF队列(n = 87)和非ETF队列(n = 47,这些患者接受了ASCT,但一线治疗后未出现ETF)。
ETF队列和非ETF队列的5年无进展生存率存在显著差异(分别为43%和57%;p = 0.048)。然而,在初次治疗后首次复发至ASCT间隔<1年的ETF患者中,5年无进展生存率(分别为48%和66%;p = 0.44)或5年总生存率(69%和77%,p = 0.4)均未观察到差异。在完全缓解状态下接受移植的ETF队列患者中,在超过13.7年的随访中,总生存曲线出现了一个56%的平台期。
对于对挽救性化疗有反应的ETF患者,ASCT可能是一种治愈性选择,无需免疫治疗或其他治疗,应被视为早期巩固治疗,尤其是在难以获得利妥昔单抗的患者中。