• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期急性人工关节周围感染中植入物取出的时机:一项多中心观察性研究。

Timing of implant-removal in late acute periprosthetic joint infection: A multicenter observational study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Infectious Diseases and Intensive Care Medicine, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.

出版信息

J Infect. 2019 Sep;79(3):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jinf.2019.07.003
PMID:31319141
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the treatment outcome in late acute (LA) periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) treated with debridement and implant retention (DAIR) versus implant removal.

METHODS

In a large multicenter study, LA PJIs of the hip and knee were retrospectively evaluated. Failure was defined as: PJI related death, prosthesis removal or the need for suppressive antibiotic therapy. LA PJI was defined as acute symptoms <3 weeks in patients more than 3 months after the index surgery and with a history of normal joint function.

RESULTS

445 patients were included, comprising 340 cases treated with DAIR and 105 cases treated with implant removal (19% one-stage revision (n = 20), 74.3% two-stage revision (n = 78) and 6.7% definitive implant removal (n = 7). Overall failure in patients treated with DAIR was 45.0% (153/340) compared to 24.8% (26/105) for implant removal (p < 0.001). Difference in failure rate remained after 1:1 propensity-score matching. A preoperative CRIME80-score ≥3 (OR 2.9), PJI caused by S. aureus (OR 1.8) and implant retention (OR 3.1) were independent predictors for failure in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

DAIR is a viable surgical treatment for most patients with LA PJI, but implant removal should be considered in a subset of patients, especially in those with a CRIME80-score ≥3.

摘要

目的

我们评估了清创保留假体(DAIR)与假体取出治疗晚期急性(LA)人工关节周围感染(PJI)的治疗效果。

方法

在一项大型多中心研究中,回顾性评估了髋膝关节 LA PJI。失败定义为:与 PJI 相关的死亡、假体取出或需要进行抑制性抗生素治疗。LA PJI 定义为指数手术后 3 个月以上的患者出现急性症状<3 周,且关节功能正常。

结果

共纳入 445 例患者,其中 340 例接受 DAIR 治疗,105 例接受假体取出治疗(19%为一期翻修(n=20),74.3%为二期翻修(n=78),6.7%为确定性假体取出(n=7)。DAIR 治疗的患者总失败率为 45.0%(153/340),而假体取出的患者为 24.8%(26/105)(p<0.001)。1:1 倾向评分匹配后,差异仍然存在。多变量分析显示,术前 CRIME80 评分≥3(OR 2.9)、金黄色葡萄球菌引起的 PJI(OR 1.8)和假体保留(OR 3.1)是失败的独立预测因素。

结论

对于大多数 LA PJI 患者,DAIR 是一种可行的手术治疗方法,但对于某些患者,特别是 CRIME80 评分≥3 的患者,应考虑取出假体。

相似文献

1
Timing of implant-removal in late acute periprosthetic joint infection: A multicenter observational study.晚期急性人工关节周围感染中植入物取出的时机:一项多中心观察性研究。
J Infect. 2019 Sep;79(3):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
2
Lower Success Rate of Débridement and Implant Retention in Late Acute versus Early Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Staphylococcus spp. Results from a Matched Cohort Study.金黄色葡萄球菌引起的晚期急性与早期急性人工关节感染的清创和植入物保留成功率较低:一项匹配队列研究的结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jun;478(6):1348-1355. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001171.
3
[Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Infections with DAIR (Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention) - Success Rate and Risk Factors of Failure].[采用清创、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)治疗急性人工关节周围感染——成功率及失败风险因素]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(3):181-187.
4
Outcome Following Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Hip Periprosthetic Joint Infection-An 18-Year Experience.髋关节假体周围感染清创、抗生素治疗及植入物保留后的结果——18年经验
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2248-2255. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.066. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
5
Predicting Failure in Early Acute Prosthetic Joint Infection Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention: External Validation of the KLIC Score.预测清创术、抗生素和保留植入物治疗早期急性人工关节感染失败:KLIC 评分的外部验证。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2582-2587. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.041. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
6
Failed Debridement and Implant Retention Does Not Compromise the Success of Subsequent Staged Revision in Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty.感染性全膝关节置换术中清创和保留植入物失败并不影响后续分期翻修的成功率。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1214-1220.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.066. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
7
Acceptable Success Rate in Patients With Periprosthetic Knee Joint Infection Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention.保肢清创术联合抗生素治疗治疗人工膝关节置换术后感染的可接受成功率。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2):365-368. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.088. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
8
Clinical outcome and risk factors for failure in late acute prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and implant retention.保留假体清创术治疗晚期急性人工关节感染失败的临床转归和危险因素
J Infect. 2019 Jan;78(1):40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
9
Accuracy of Predictive Algorithms in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections Treated With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR).预测算法在全髋关节和膝关节置换术急性假体周围关节感染中的准确性,这些感染采用清创术、抗生素和保留植入物(DAIR)治疗。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jul;36(7):2558-2566. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.039. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
10
A Comparison of Outcomes of Culture positive and Culture negative Acute Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection following Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR).清创术、抗生素保留和假体保留(DAIR)治疗下培养阳性和培养阴性急性膝关节假体关节感染的结局比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Aug;33(6):2375-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03445-2. Epub 2022 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Unconventional Therapies in Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Prevention and Treatment: A Narrative Review.人工关节周围感染的非常规治疗:预防与治疗:一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 10;14(8):2610. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082610.
2
Differences of microbial growth and biofilm formation among periprosthetic joint infection-causing species: an animal study.人工关节感染致病菌种间微生物生长及生物膜形成的差异:一项动物研究。
Int Microbiol. 2025 Jan 16. doi: 10.1007/s10123-024-00629-0.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection after knee arthroplasty: a call for a randomised trial.
膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染一期翻修与二期翻修的系统评价和荟萃分析:呼吁进行随机试验
EFORT Open Rev. 2024 Jun 3;9(6):479-487. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0147.
4
Effect of a national infection control programme in Sweden on prosthetic joint infection incidence following primary total hip arthroplasty: a cohort study.瑞典国家感染控制项目对初次全髋关节置换术后人工关节感染发生率的影响:一项队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 29;14(4):e076576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076576.
5
Two stage revision: indications, techniques and results.两阶段翻修:适应症、技术及结果
Ann Jt. 2022 Jan 15;7:4. doi: 10.21037/aoj-20-84. eCollection 2022.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-stage vs two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection: a call for a prospective randomized trial.系统评价和荟萃分析单阶段与双阶段翻修治疗人工关节周围感染:呼吁前瞻性随机试验。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 19;25(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07229-z.
7
Validation of a Classification System for Optimal Application of Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention in Prosthetic Joint Infections following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Review.全膝关节置换术后假体关节感染清创、抗生素及植入物保留最佳应用分类系统的验证:一项回顾性研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;13(1):48. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010048.
8
Incidence, functional outcomes and cure rate of hematogenous infection in a 2,498 Total Knee Arthroplasties cohort.2498例全膝关节置换术队列中血源性感染的发生率、功能结局及治愈率
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Sep 25;10(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00656-2.
9
Knowledge and attitudes of orthopedic surgeons regarding prosthesis joint infection.骨科医生对人工关节感染的认知与态度。
World J Orthop. 2023 Apr 18;14(4):240-247. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i4.240.
10
Rifampicin Enhanced Carbapenem Activity with Improved Antibacterial Effects and Eradicates Established Biofilms.利福平增强碳青霉烯类活性,具有改善的抗菌效果并根除已形成的生物膜。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Mar 23;16(4):477. doi: 10.3390/ph16040477.