Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Oct;45(10):2805-2818. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.05.034. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Although the minimum variance beamformer (MVB) shows a significant improvement in resolution and contrast in medical ultrasound imaging, its high computational complexity is a major problem in a real-time imaging system. Therefore, it seems necessary to propose a new method with a lower computational complexity that preserves the advantages of the MVB. In this paper, the MVB was implemented with a partial generalized sidelobe canceler (GSC) with a blocking matrix based on our previous study, which projected the incoming signals to a lower dimensional space. The partial GSC separated the weight vector into one fixed and one adaptive weight, whereby the optimization could be performed with lower complexity on the adaptive part. In addition, this dimension reduction allowed us to increase the length of the subarray when using a spatial smoothing method, which was used to decorrelate the incoming signals. The subarray length was limited to half the length of the full array size in the ordinary MVB, while the proposed beamformer could cross over this limitation. The results demonstrated that the point spread function of the proposed beamformer was about 6.3 times narrower than the classic MVB, while the contrast was almost saved. These results were achieved with linear computational complexity by the proposed method, while it was cubic for the MVB. For a sample scenario, the proposed method needed only 1.8% of the required ops of the MVB.
尽管最小方差波束形成器 (MVB) 在医学超声成象中显示出显著的分辨率和对比度改善,但它的高计算复杂性是实时成象系统中的一个主要问题。因此,似乎有必要提出一种具有较低计算复杂性的新方法,同时保留 MVB 的优点。在本文中,我们基于之前的研究,使用基于阻塞矩阵的部分广义旁瓣消除器 (GSC) 来实现 MVB,该方法将输入信号投影到较低的维度空间。部分 GSC 将权向量分为一个固定权和一个自适应权,从而可以在自适应部分进行复杂度较低的优化。此外,这种降维允许我们在使用空间平滑方法时增加子阵的长度,该方法用于解相关输入信号。子阵长度在普通 MVB 中限制为全阵大小的一半,而所提出的波束形成器可以超过此限制。结果表明,所提出的波束形成器的点扩散函数比经典 MVB 窄约 6.3 倍,而对比度几乎保持不变。这些结果是通过所提出的方法以线性计算复杂度实现的,而对于 MVB 则是立方复杂度。对于一个示例场景,所提出的方法仅需要 MVB 所需操作数的 1.8%。