Département de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologie, Unité de Chirurgie du membre inférieur et du rachis, Hôpital Lapeyronie, CHRU de Montpellier, 351, avenue Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Département de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologie, Unité de Chirurgie du membre inférieur et du rachis, Hôpital Lapeyronie, CHRU de Montpellier, 351, avenue Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):999-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
Arthroplasty has not been proven superior over internal fixation for the treatment of non-displaced femoral neck fractures. However, internal fixation has been followed by high rates of revision for mechanical complications and of femoral neck impaction within the first postoperative year. The objective of this study was to determine whether femoral neck impaction was associated with avascular necrosis (AVN).
Fracture healing with femoral neck shortening by impaction after internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture is associated with AVN.
A single-centre retrospective study in patients with Garden I fractures managed by screw fixation was performed to compare outcomes in the groups with and without femoral neck impaction. Follow-up radiographs were assessed for evidence of the femoral neck impaction during fracture healing. The occurrence of AVN was the primary evaluation criterion. The secondary evaluation criteria were risk factors for impaction and complications.
Of the 75 included patients, 9 (12%) experienced AVN. Impaction was significantly associated with AVN (p=0.02; relative risk, 4.38). Significant risk factors for impaction were a higher body mass index (p=0.0003) and valgus-impacted fracture reduction between the radiographs at baseline and immediately after surgery (p=0.0001).
Femoral neck impaction was a significant risk factor for AVN after screw fixation of Garden I fractures. Valgus-impacted fracture reduction must receive careful attention during fixation. We suggest static internal fixation if the impaction is reduced on a traction table and advise caution when using parallel screws. The diagnostic and therapeutic strategy proposed here deserves to be evaluated in a prospective study.
III, retrospective comparative study.
关节置换术并未被证明优于内固定治疗无移位股骨颈骨折。然而,内固定后机械并发症和术后 1 年内股骨颈嵌压的翻修率很高。本研究的目的是确定股骨颈嵌压是否与股骨头坏死(AVN)有关。
股骨颈骨折内固定后通过嵌压导致股骨颈缩短而愈合与 AVN 有关。
对采用螺钉固定治疗 Garden I 型骨折的患者进行单中心回顾性研究,比较有和无股骨颈嵌压患者的结局。随访 X 线片评估骨折愈合过程中股骨颈嵌压的证据。AVN 的发生是主要评估标准。次要评估标准为嵌压和并发症的危险因素。
75 例纳入患者中,9 例(12%)发生 AVN。嵌压与 AVN 显著相关(p=0.02;相对风险,4.38)。嵌压的显著危险因素是较高的体重指数(p=0.0003)和基线与术后即刻 X 线片之间的外翻嵌压骨折复位(p=0.0001)。
股骨颈嵌压是 Garden I 型骨折螺钉固定后发生 AVN 的显著危险因素。在固定过程中必须仔细注意外翻嵌压骨折复位。如果在牵引台上降低嵌压,我们建议采用静态内固定,并在使用平行螺钉时谨慎。这里提出的诊断和治疗策略值得在前瞻性研究中进行评估。
III 级,回顾性比较研究。