Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Department of Infection Prevention and Control, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1-2. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008926. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Contact precautions for endemic methicillin-resistant (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant (VRE) are a resource-intensive intervention to reduce healthcare-associated infections, potentially impeding patient throughput and limiting bed availability to isolate other contagious pathogens. We investigated the impact of the discontinuation of contact precautions (DcCP) for endemic MRSA and VRE on patient outcomes and operations metrics in an acute care setting.
This is a retrospective, quasi-experimental analysis of the 12 months before and after DcCP for MRSA and VRE at an academic medical centre. The frequency for bed closures due to contact isolation was measured, and personal protective equipment (PPE) expenditures and patient satisfaction survey results were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Using an interrupted time series design, emergency department (ED) admission wait times and rates of patient falls, pressure ulcers and nosocomial MRSA and VRE clinical isolates were compared using GEEs.
Prior to DcCP, bed closures for MRSA and/or VRE isolation were associated with estimated lost hospital charges of $9383 per 100 bed days (95% CI: 8447 to 10 318). No change in ED wait times or change in trend was observed following DcCP. There were significant reductions in monthly expenditures on gowns (-61.0%) and gloves (-16.3%). Patient satisfaction survey results remained stable. No significant changes in rates or trends were observed for patient falls or pressure ulcers. Incidence rates of nosocomial MRSA (1.58 (95% CI: 0.82 to 3.04)) and VRE (1.02 (95% CI: 0.82 to 1.27)) did not significantly change.
DcCP was associated with an increase in bed availability and revenue recovery, and a reduction in PPE expenditures. Benefits for other hospital operations metrics and patient outcomes were not identified.
接触预防措施对于地方性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)是减少医疗保健相关感染的资源密集型干预措施,可能会阻碍患者的吞吐量并限制可用于隔离其他传染性病原体的床位可用性。我们研究了在急性护理环境中停止接触预防措施(DcCP)对地方性 MRSA 和 VRE 患者结局和运营指标的影响。
这是对学术医疗中心进行 MRSA 和 VRE 的 DcCP 前后 12 个月的回顾性准实验分析。测量因接触隔离而关闭床位的频率,并使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较个人防护设备(PPE)支出和患者满意度调查结果。使用中断时间序列设计,使用广义估计方程比较急诊部(ED)入院等待时间以及患者跌倒、压疮和医院获得性 MRSA 和 VRE 临床分离株的发生率。
在 DcCP 之前,因 MRSA 和/或 VRE 隔离而关闭床位与估计每 100 个床位天损失 9383 美元的医院费用有关(95%CI:8447 至 10318)。DcCP 后,ED 等待时间没有变化或趋势没有变化。手术服的月支出(-61.0%)和手套(-16.3%)显著减少。患者满意度调查结果保持稳定。患者跌倒或压疮的发生率或趋势没有明显变化。医院获得性 MRSA(1.58(95%CI:0.82 至 3.04))和 VRE(1.02(95%CI:0.82 至 1.27))的发生率没有显著变化。
DcCP 与床位可用性和收入恢复增加以及 PPE 支出减少相关。未发现其他医院运营指标和患者结局的获益。