• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会第四部分考试成功通过相关的变量。

Variables associated with successful performance on the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners Part IV examination.

作者信息

Himelfarb Igor, Shotts Bruce L, Hyland John K, Gow Andrew R

出版信息

J Chiropr Educ. 2020 Mar;34(1):43-51. doi: 10.7899/JCE-18-28. Epub 2019 Jul 19.

DOI:10.7899/JCE-18-28
PMID:31322907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7074951/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to (1) identify factors predictive of performance on the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners Part IV exam and (2) investigate correlations between the scores obtained in the Part I, Part II, Physiotherapy, and Part III exams and the Part IV examination.

METHODS

A random sample of 1341 records was drawn from National Board of Chiropractic Examiners data to investigate the relationships between the scores obtained on the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners exams. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis related the performance on Part IV to examinee's gender, Part IV repeater status, and scores obtained on the Part I, Part II, Physiotherapy, and Part III exams.

RESULTS

The analyses revealed statistical relations among all National Board of Chiropractic Examiners exams. The correlations between Part IV and Part I ranged from = .31 to = .4; between Part IV and Part II from = .34 to = .45. The correlation between Part IV and Physiotherapy was = .44; between Part IV and Part III was = .46. The strongest predictors of the Part IV score were found to be examinees' scores in Diagnostic Imaging, = .19, < .001; Chiropractic Practice, = .17, < .001; Physiotherapy, = .15, < .001; and the Part III exam = .19, < .001.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance on the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners Part IV examination is related to the performance in all other National Board of Chiropractic Examiners exams.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是(1)确定美国脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会第四部分考试成绩的预测因素,以及(2)调查第一部分、第二部分、物理治疗和第三部分考试成绩与第四部分考试成绩之间的相关性。

方法

从美国脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会的数据中随机抽取1341份记录样本,以研究美国脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会各项考试成绩之间的关系。采用分层多元回归分析,将第四部分的成绩与考生的性别、第四部分重考状态以及第一部分、第二部分、物理治疗和第三部分考试的成绩联系起来。

结果

分析揭示了美国脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会所有考试之间的统计关系。第四部分与第一部分的相关性在r = 0.31至r = 0.4之间;第四部分与第二部分的相关性在r = 0.34至r = 0.45之间。第四部分与物理治疗的相关性为r = 0.44;第四部分与第三部分的相关性为r = 0.46。发现第四部分成绩的最强预测因素是考生在诊断成像方面的成绩,r = 0.19,p < 0.001;脊椎按摩疗法实践,r = 0.17,p < 0.001;物理治疗,r = 0.15,p < 0.001;以及第三部分考试成绩,r = 0.19,p < 0.001。

结论

美国脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会第四部分考试的成绩与美国脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会所有其他考试的成绩相关。

相似文献

1
Variables associated with successful performance on the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners Part IV examination.与脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会第四部分考试成功通过相关的变量。
J Chiropr Educ. 2020 Mar;34(1):43-51. doi: 10.7899/JCE-18-28. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
2
A preliminary analysis of preparation strategies and other correlates to performance on a basic science qualifying exam in chiropractic.对脊椎按摩疗法基础科学资格考试的备考策略及其他与考试成绩相关因素的初步分析。
J Allied Health. 2006 Spring;35(1):e59-72.
3
Predictors of performance on the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners Parts I and II.美国国家脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会第一部分和第二部分考试成绩的预测因素。
J Chiropr Educ. 2014 Spring;28(1):9-15. doi: 10.7899/JCE-13-7. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
4
Examining the validity of chiropractic grade point averages for predicting National Board of Chiropractic Examiners Part I exam scores.检验脊椎按摩疗法平均绩点对预测美国脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会第一部分考试成绩的有效性。
J Chiropr Educ. 2022 Mar 1;36(1):1-12. doi: 10.7899/JCE-20-5.
5
Comparison of National Board of Chiropractic Examiners part I examination scores between tutors and tutees at a chiropractic college.一所脊椎按摩疗法学院中导师与学员在国家脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会第一部分考试成绩的比较。
J Chiropr Educ. 2016 Oct;30(2):104-107. doi: 10.7899/JCE-15-00013. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
6
The use of Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI) as a predictor for success or failure on part I of the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners Test.使用学习与学习策略量表(LASSI)作为脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会第一部分考试成败的预测指标。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1998 Mar-Apr;21(3):164-6.
7
The transition to digital presentation of the diagnostic imaging domain of the Part IV examination of the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners.脊骨神经医学国家委员会第四部分考试诊断成像领域向数字呈现的转变。
J Chiropr Educ. 2020 Mar;34(1):52-67. doi: 10.7899/JCE-19-2. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
8
Learning and Study Strategies Inventory subtests and factors as predictors of National Board of Chiropractic Examiners Part 1 examination performance.作为脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会第1部分考试成绩预测指标的学习与学习策略量表子测试及因素
J Chiropr Educ. 2013 Spring;27(1):5-10. doi: 10.7899/JCE-D-12-012.
9
Current state and future directions of the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners.脊骨神经科医师国家考试委员会的现状与未来发展方向
J Chiropr Educ. 2020 Mar;34(1):31-34. doi: 10.7899/JCE-19-24. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
10
Correlation of National Board of Medical Examiners scores with United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 And Step 2 scores.美国医师执照考试第 1 步和第 2 步成绩与全国医师考试委员会成绩的相关性。
Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1348-54. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826a13bd.

引用本文的文献

1
Chiropractic qualifying examinations: .脊椎按摩疗法资格考试:
J Chiropr Educ. 2020 Mar;34(1):1-3. doi: 10.7899/JCE-19-30. Epub 2020 Jan 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Score production and quantitative methods used by the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners for postexam analyses.脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会用于考后分析的分数生成与定量方法。
J Chiropr Educ. 2020 Mar;34(1):35-42. doi: 10.7899/JCE-18-27. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
2
A primer on standardized testing: .标准化测试入门:
J Chiropr Educ. 2019 Oct;33(2):151-163. doi: 10.7899/JCE-18-22. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
3
The influence of curricular and extracurricular learning activities on students' choice of chiropractic technique.课程学习活动和课外学习活动对学生选择整脊疗法的影响。
J Chiropr Educ. 2016 Mar;30(1):30-6. doi: 10.7899/JCE-15-6. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
4
Predictors of performance on the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners Parts I and II.美国国家脊椎按摩疗法考试委员会第一部分和第二部分考试成绩的预测因素。
J Chiropr Educ. 2014 Spring;28(1):9-15. doi: 10.7899/JCE-13-7. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
5
Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education?客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)是否是评估本科医学教育能力的可行工具?
Med Teach. 2013 Jun;35(6):503-14. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.774330. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
6
Correlation between academic performance and NBCE part I scores at a chiropractic college.一所脊骨神经医学院学术成绩与美国国家脊骨神经考试委员会第一部分考试成绩之间的相关性。
J Chiropr Educ. 2013 Spring;27(1):27-32. doi: 10.7899/JCE-12-010.
7
Medical schools in the United States, 2009-2010.美国2009 - 2010年的医学院校
JAMA. 2010 Sep 15;304(11):1247-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1154.
8
Improving education in primary care: development of an online curriculum using the blended learning model.提高初级保健教育水平:利用混合学习模式开发在线课程。
BMC Med Educ. 2009 Jun 10;9:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-9-33.
9
Unintentional failure to assess for experience in senior undergraduate OSCE scoring.在本科高年级客观结构化临床考试评分中,意外未对经验进行评估。
Med Educ. 2008 Jul;42(7):669-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03043.x.
10
Competency domains in an undergraduate Objective Structured Clinical Examination: their impact on compensatory standard setting.本科客观结构化临床考试中的能力领域:它们对补偿性标准设定的影响。
Med Educ. 2008 Jun;42(6):600-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03021.x.