Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Department of Radiology, Children's Health, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Br J Radiol. 2019 Oct;92(1102):20190133. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190133. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) assessment is essential for accurate quantification of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics and usually requires the use of a difference image method using duplicate images. We aimed to estimate the SNR of DTI of thigh muscles using a single image set without duplicate images.
DTI of one thigh were acquired on a 3 T scanner from 15 healthy adults, and scans with number of signal averages (NSA) = 4 and 8 were repeatedly acquired. SNR were evaluated for six thigh muscles. For SNR calculation from a single image set, diffusion-weighted images with similar diffusion encoding directions were grouped into pairs. The difference image of each pair was high-pass filtered in k-space to yield noise images. Noise images were also calculated with a difference method using two image sets as a reference. Subjects were divided into two groups for filter optimization and validation, respectively. The coefficient of repeatability (CR) of the SNR obtained from the two methods was also evaluated separately.
BlandAltman analysis comparing the single image set method and the reference showed 95% limits of agreement of -9.2 to 9.2% for the optimization group and -12.5 to 12.6% for the validation group. The SNR measurement had a CR of 21.1% using the reference method, and 13.8% using the single image set method.
The single image method can be used for DTI SNR assessment and offers better repeatability.
SNR of skeletal muscle DTI can be assessed for any data set without duplicate images.
信噪比(SNR)评估对于准确量化扩散张量成像(DTI)指标至关重要,通常需要使用使用重复图像的差分图像方法。我们旨在使用一组没有重复图像的单图像集来估计大腿肌肉的 DTI SNR。
在 3T 扫描仪上对 15 名健康成年人的一条大腿进行 DTI 采集,并重复采集 NSA=4 和 8 的扫描。评估了六块大腿肌肉的 SNR。对于单图像集的 SNR 计算,将具有相似扩散编码方向的扩散加权图像分为对。每对的差分图像在 k 空间中进行高通滤波,以产生噪声图像。还使用两组图像作为参考的差分方法计算了噪声图像。受试者分为两组进行滤波器优化和验证。还分别评估了两种方法获得的 SNR 的可重复性(CR)。
比较单图像集方法和参考的 BlandAltman 分析显示,优化组的 95%一致性限为-9.2%至 9.2%,验证组为-12.5%至 12.6%。使用参考方法,SNR 测量的 CR 为 21.1%,使用单图像集方法为 13.8%。
单图像方法可用于 DTI SNR 评估,并且具有更好的可重复性。
可以对任何没有重复图像的数据集进行骨骼肌 DTI 的 SNR 评估。