Suppr超能文献

植物会改变其垂直根系分布,而不是改变生物量分配,以应对降水的变化。

Plants alter their vertical root distribution rather than biomass allocation in response to changing precipitation.

机构信息

Department of Ecology, State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China.

State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.

出版信息

Ecology. 2019 Nov;100(11):e02828. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2828. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

Abstract

Elucidating the variation of allocation pattern of ecosystem net primary productivity (NPP) and its underlying mechanisms is critically important for understanding the changes of aboveground and belowground ecosystem functions. Under optimal partitioning theory, plants should allocate more NPP to the organ that acquires the most limiting resource, and this expectation has been widely used to explain and predict NPP allocation under changing precipitation. However, confirmatory evidence for this theory has mostly come from observed spatial variation in the relationship between precipitation and NPP allocation across ecosystems, rather than directly from the influences of changing precipitation on NPP allocation within systems. We performed a 6-yr five-level precipitation manipulation experiment in a semiarid steppe to test whether changes in NPP allocation can be explained by the optimal partitioning theory, and how water requirement of plant community is maintained if NPP allocation is unaltered. The 30 precipitation levels (5 levels × 6 yr) were divided into dry, nominal, and wet precipitation ranges, relative to historical precipitation variation over the past six decades. We found that NPP in both aboveground (ANPP) and belowground (BNPP) increased nonlinearly as precipitation increased, while the allocation of NPP to BNPP (f ) showed a concave quadratic relationship with precipitation. The declined f as precipitation increased in the dry range supported the optimal partitioning theory. However, in the nominal range, NPP allocation was not influenced by the changed precipitation; instead, BNPP was distributed more in the surface soil horizon (0-10 cm) as precipitation increased, and conversely more in the deeper soil layers (10-30 cm) as precipitation decreased. This response in root foraging appears to be a strategy to satisfy plant water requirements and partially explains the stable NPP allocation patterns. Overall, our results suggest that plants can adjust their vertical BNPP distribution in response to drought stress, and that only under extreme drought does the optimal partitioning theory strictly apply, highlighting the context dependency of the adaption and growth of plants under changing precipitation.

摘要

阐明生态系统净初级生产力(NPP)分配格局的变化及其潜在机制对于理解地上和地下生态系统功能的变化至关重要。在最优分配理论下,植物应该将更多的 NPP 分配到获取最限制资源的器官,这一期望已被广泛用于解释和预测降水变化下的 NPP 分配。然而,该理论的证实证据主要来自于对生态系统之间降水与 NPP 分配关系的空间变化的观察,而不是直接来自于降水变化对系统内 NPP 分配的影响。我们在半干旱草原进行了为期 6 年的五级降水处理实验,以检验 NPP 分配是否可以用最优分配理论来解释,如果 NPP 分配不变,植物群落的水分需求将如何维持。30 个降水水平(5 个水平×6 年)分为干旱、正常和湿润降水范围,相对于过去六十年的历史降水变化。我们发现,地上(ANPP)和地下(BNPP)NPP 都随着降水的增加呈非线性增加,而 NPP 向 BNPP 的分配(f)与降水呈凹二次关系。在干旱范围内,随着降水的增加,f 下降,这支持了最优分配理论。然而,在正常范围内,降水变化并不影响 NPP 分配;相反,随着降水的增加,BNPP 更多地分布在表层土壤层(0-10 cm),而随着降水的减少,BNPP 更多地分布在较深的土壤层(10-30 cm)。这种根系觅食的反应似乎是一种满足植物水分需求的策略,部分解释了 NPP 分配模式的稳定性。总的来说,我们的结果表明,植物可以根据干旱胁迫调整其垂直 BNPP 分布,只有在极端干旱的情况下,最优分配理论才严格适用,突出了植物在降水变化下的适应和生长的背景依赖性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验