Suppr超能文献

格列美脲-二甲双胍与维格列汀-二甲双胍治疗新诊断2型糖尿病患者的安全性和疗效比较

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Glimepiride-Metformin and Vildagliptin- Metformin Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetic Patients.

作者信息

Mokta Jatinder Kumar, Sahai Ashok Kumar, Kaundal Purshottam Kumar, Mokta Kiran

机构信息

Professor, Department of Medicine, IGMC, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

Senior Resident, Department of Pharmacology,IGMC, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.

出版信息

J Assoc Physicians India. 2018 Aug;66(8):30-35.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and efficacy of combination of Glimepiride - Metformin with Vildagliptin - Metformin in type 2 diabetic patients with HbA1c between 7.5to10.

METHODS

A randomized, prospective, comparative and interventional study was conducted at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla. The level of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting blood sugar (FBS) and postprandial blood sugar (PP) were the primary outcomes, whereas, the evidence of hypoglycemia, quality of life and weight gain were recorded as secondary outcomes. 215 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized into Glimepiride-Metformin group (Group1) having 111 patients and Vildagliptin-Metformin group (Group 2) having 106 patients. Patients were followed up at 3 month, 12 month, 24 month and then after completion of 30 month of treatment.

RESULTS

A comparable FPG, PPPG and HbA1c were observed from baseline at the end of 12 weeks in both groups. However, at the 130-week endpoint a significantly more pronounced reduction in HbA1c was observed in vildagliptin-metformin (1.96%) arm compared to Glimepiride-metformin (1.67%) arm. A similar significant more pronounced reduction was demonstrated in both FPG (48.25% vs. 41.70%) and PPPG (49.40% vs. 42.95%) in vildagliptin-metformin group compared to Glimepiride-metformin group. The proportion of patients who achieved an A1C < 7% at 130-weeks was 49% in the vildagliptin group and 41% in the Glimepiride group. Statistically significant more weight gain was observed in Glimepiride arm compared to vildagliptin arm (2.09 kg vs. 0.69 kg) and 8-fold lower incidence was observed in vildagliptin group. Conclusion: Vildagliptin -metformin represent a more effective combination in terms of number of patients achieving guidelines recommended A1C target of less than 7% at the end of 30 months, less weight gain, and a lower risk of hypoglycemia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients with moderate hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Vildagliptin -metformin represent a more effective combination in terms of number of patients achieving guidelines recommended A1C target of less than 7% at the end of 30 months, less weight gain, and a lower risk of hypoglycemia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients with moderate hypoglycemia.

摘要

目的

比较格列美脲 - 二甲双胍与维格列汀 - 二甲双胍联合用药对糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平在7.5%至10%之间的2型糖尿病患者的安全性和疗效。

方法

在西姆拉的英迪拉·甘地医学院进行了一项随机、前瞻性、对比性和干预性研究。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平、空腹血糖(FBS)和餐后血糖(PP)为主要观察指标,而低血糖证据、生活质量和体重增加情况则作为次要观察指标记录。215例新诊断的2型糖尿病患者被随机分为格列美脲 - 二甲双胍组(第1组,111例患者)和维格列汀 - 二甲双胍组(第2组,106例患者)。在治疗3个月、12个月、24个月以及完成30个月治疗后对患者进行随访。

结果

两组在12周结束时,空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后血糖(PPPG)和HbA1c与基线水平相比具有可比性。然而,在130周的终点时发现,维格列汀 - 二甲双胍组的HbA1c降低幅度(1.96%)明显大于格列美脲 - 二甲双胍组(1.67%)。与格列美脲 - 二甲双胍组相比,维格列汀 - 二甲双胍组的空腹血糖(48.25%对41.70%)和餐后血糖(49.40%对42.95%)也有类似的更明显降低。在130周时达到糖化血红蛋白(A1C)<7%的患者比例,维格列汀组为49%,格列美脲组为41%。与维格列汀组相比,格列美脲组观察到的体重增加在统计学上更显著(2.09千克对0.69千克),且维格列汀组的发生率低8倍。结论:对于新诊断的有中度低血糖的2型糖尿病患者,在30个月结束时达到指南推荐的糖化血红蛋白(A1C)目标低于7%的患者数量、体重增加较少以及低血糖风险较低方面,维格列汀 - 二甲双胍联合用药表现出更有效的组合效果。

结论

对于新诊断的有中度低血糖的2型糖尿病患者,在30个月结束时达到指南推荐的糖化血红蛋白(A1C)目标低于7%的患者数量、体重增加较少以及低血糖风险较低方面,维格列汀 - 二甲双胍联合用药表现出更有效的组合效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验