• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对《临床医生、专业学会及其他人员如何评估和改善供患者使用的应用程序的质量?》的更正

Correction to: How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use?

作者信息

Wyatt Jeremy C

机构信息

Wessex Institute of Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 7NS, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2019 Jul 20;17(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1381-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12916-019-1381-y
PMID:31324169
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6642560/
Abstract

Since the publication of this article [1] it has come to my attention that it contains an error in which the y-axis in Fig. 1 was inverted, thus incorrectly displaying a weak negative correlation rather than a weak positive one. This error was introduced as the order of the data on which Fig. 2 was based [2] was misread. The corrected version of Fig. 2 can be seen below, in which a weak positive correlation is now displayed. This does not change the general point, that app users and app stores appear to take little notice of the source of information on which apps are based. I apologise to readers for this error.

摘要

自本文[1]发表以来,我注意到其中存在一个错误,即图1中的y轴被倒置了,因此错误地显示出弱负相关而非弱正相关。这个错误是由于误读了图2所基于的数据[2]的顺序而产生的。下面可以看到图2的修正版本,其中现在显示出弱正相关。这并不改变总体观点,即应用程序用户和应用程序商店似乎很少关注应用程序所基于的信息来源。我为此错误向读者道歉。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c6/6642560/792ffabe3d43/12916_2019_1381_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c6/6642560/792ffabe3d43/12916_2019_1381_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c6/6642560/792ffabe3d43/12916_2019_1381_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Correction to: How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use?对《临床医生、专业学会及其他人员如何评估和改善供患者使用的应用程序的质量?》的更正
BMC Med. 2019 Jul 20;17(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1381-y.
2
How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use?临床医生、专业学会和其他人员如何评估和改进患者使用的应用程序的质量?
BMC Med. 2018 Dec 3;16(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1211-7.
3
Development and validation of the Italian version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale and its generalisability to apps targeting primary prevention.意大利语版移动应用程序评分量表的开发与验证及其对初级预防应用程序的通用性
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Jul 7;16:83. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0323-2.
4
Apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents: a review of quality, features and behaviour change techniques.改善儿童和青少年饮食、身体活动及久坐行为的应用程序:质量、功能及行为改变技巧综述
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 24;14(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0538-3.
5
Author Correction: Fermiology and electron dynamics of trilayer nickelate LaNiO.作者更正:三层镍酸盐LaNiO的费米学与电子动力学
Nat Commun. 2018 May 11;9(1):1958. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04105-y.
6
Author Correction: SZT2 dictates GATOR control of mTORC1 signalling.作者更正:SZT2 决定 GATOR 对 mTORC1 信号通路的调控。
Nature. 2018 Jun;558(7710):E2. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0114-2.
7
Publisher Correction: Mapping microscale wetting variations on biological and synthetic water-repellent surfaces.出版商更正:绘制生物和合成疏水表面上的微观尺度润湿性变化
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 9;9(1):668. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03042-0.
8
A pictorial schema for a comprehensive user-oriented identification of medical Apps.一个用于全面、以用户为导向识别医疗应用程序的图示模式。
Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(3):208-24. doi: 10.3414/ME13-01-0093. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
9
Publisher Correction: Rotating robots move collectively and self-organize.出版商更正:旋转机器人集体移动并自我组织。
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 11;9(1):1497. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03873-x.
10
Mobile Apps for Blood Pressure Monitoring: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.用于血压监测的移动应用程序:在应用商店中的系统搜索与内容分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Nov 14;6(11):e187. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9888.

引用本文的文献

1
Eliciting Preferences for the Uptake of Smoking Cessation Apps: Discrete Choice Experiment.探究对戒烟应用程序使用的偏好:离散选择实验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 14;27:e37083. doi: 10.2196/37083.
2
Obesity and Morbidity Risk in the U.S. Veteran.美国退伍军人中的肥胖与发病风险
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Jun 29;8(3):191. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8030191.

本文引用的文献

1
How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use?临床医生、专业学会和其他人员如何评估和改进患者使用的应用程序的质量?
BMC Med. 2018 Dec 3;16(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1211-7.
2
A content analysis of popular smartphone apps for smoking cessation.对流行的智能手机戒烟应用程序的内容分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Dec;45(6):732-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.008.