• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥散峰度成像在宫颈癌评估中的应用。

Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in the Assessment of Cervical Carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.

Philips Healthcare, Greater China, China.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2020 May;27(5):e94-e101. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.022. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.022
PMID:31324577
Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the additional value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in the characterization of cervical carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five patients (56.9 ± 13.4 years) with histologic-confirmed cervical carcinoma were included. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was acquired on a 3T MRI with five b values (0, 500, 800, 1000, and 1500 s/mm). Data were analyzed based on DKI model (5 b values) and conventional DWI (0 and 1000 s/mm). Largest single-slice region of interest (ROI) and volume of interest (VOI) were drawn around the tumor. Mean diffusivity (MD), mean kurtosis (MK), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of cervical carcinoma and normal myometrium were measured and compared. MD, MK, and ADC of cervical carcinoma were compared among histologic subtypes, tumor grades, and FIGO stages.

RESULTS

ROI- and VOI-derived DKI parameters and ADC were all in excellent consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC > 0.90, respectively). Cervical carcinoma had significantly lower MD, ADC, and higher MK than normal myometrium (p < 0.001). MD and ADC showed significant differences between histologic subtypes and FIGO stages, lower in squamous cell carcinoma than adenocarcinoma and higher in FIGO I-II than FIGO III-IV (p < 0.050), but not with tumor grade. No difference was observed in MK for different clinicopathologic features tested.

CONCLUSION

ROI and VOI analyses were in excellent consistency. MD and ADC were able to distinguish histologic subtypes and separating FIGO stages, MK could not. DKI showed no clear added value over conventional DWI in the characterization of cervical carcinoma.

摘要

背景与目的

评估扩散峰度成像(DKI)在宫颈癌特征描述中的附加价值。

材料与方法

共纳入 75 例经组织学证实的宫颈癌患者(年龄 56.9±13.4 岁)。在 3T MRI 上采集扩散加权成像(DWI),共 5 个 b 值(0、500、800、1000 和 1500 s/mm)。数据基于 DKI 模型(5 个 b 值)和常规 DWI(0 和 1000 s/mm)进行分析。在肿瘤周围绘制最大单层面 ROI 和 VOI。测量并比较宫颈癌和正常子宫肌的平均扩散系数(MD)、平均峰度(MK)和表观扩散系数(ADC)。比较宫颈癌不同组织学亚型、肿瘤分级和 FIGO 分期的 MD、MK 和 ADC。

结果

ROI 和 VOI 衍生的 DKI 参数和 ADC 均具有极好的一致性(组内相关系数 ICC>0.90)。宫颈癌的 MD、ADC 显著低于正常子宫肌,MK 显著高于正常子宫肌(p<0.001)。MD 和 ADC 在组织学亚型和 FIGO 分期之间存在显著差异,鳞癌低于腺癌,FIGO I-II 期低于 FIGO III-IV 期(p<0.050),但与肿瘤分级无关。MK 在不同临床病理特征中无差异。

结论

ROI 和 VOI 分析具有极好的一致性。MD 和 ADC 能够区分组织学亚型和区分 FIGO 分期,MK 则不能。DKI 在宫颈癌的特征描述中没有比常规 DWI 更明显的附加价值。

相似文献

1
Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in the Assessment of Cervical Carcinoma.弥散峰度成像在宫颈癌评估中的应用。
Acad Radiol. 2020 May;27(5):e94-e101. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.022. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
2
Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical cancer and its correlation with the differentiation process of cervical cancer.多模态磁共振成像在宫颈癌诊断及其与宫颈癌分化过程的相关性研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Sep 29;23(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01104-4.
3
Comparative analysis of the value of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in evaluating the histological grade of cervical squamous carcinoma.酰胺质子转移加权成像与扩散峰度成像评估宫颈鳞癌组织学分级的价值比较分析。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 20;22(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09205-z.
4
Application of magnetic resonance diffusion kurtosis imaging for distinguishing histopathologic subtypes and grades of rectal carcinoma.磁共振扩散峰度成像在鉴别直肠癌组织病理亚型和分级中的应用。
Cancer Imaging. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0192-x.
5
Staging liver fibrosis with DWI: is there an added value for diffusion kurtosis imaging?DWI 对肝纤维化分期:扩散峰度成像是否有附加价值?
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):3041-3049. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5245-6. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
6
Whole-tumor texture model based on diffusion kurtosis imaging for assessing cervical cancer: a preliminary study.基于扩散峰度成像的全肿瘤纹理模型评估宫颈癌:一项初步研究。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Aug;31(8):5576-5585. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07612-z. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
7
Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging mono-exponential mode with diffusion kurtosis imaging for predicting pathological grades of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.比较单指数模型弥散加权成像与扩散峰度成像预测肾透明细胞癌病理分级的价值。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Sep;130:109195. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109195. Epub 2020 Jul 26.
8
Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.3.0T 磁共振扩散峰度成像在乳腺癌特征性诊断中的应用:与预后因素的相关性研究
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar;49(3):845-856. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26249. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
9
Prediction of lymphovascular space invasion in cervical carcinoma using diffusion kurtosis imaging.利用扩散峰度成像预测宫颈癌中的淋巴管间隙浸润
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2022;31:100559. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100559. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.扩散峰度成像与标准扩散成像在周围区前列腺癌检测及分级中的评估
Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):483-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000155.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative prediction of p16 expression in cervical cancer by amide proton transfer imaging combined with diffusion kurtosis imaging: a retrospective study.酰胺质子转移成像联合扩散峰度成像对宫颈癌p16表达的术前预测:一项回顾性研究
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 30;13:e19387. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19387. eCollection 2025.
2
Whole-tumor histogram analysis of multiple non-Gaussian diffusion models at high b values for assessing cervical cancer.多 b 值下非高斯扩散模型的全肿瘤直方图分析用于评估宫颈癌。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Jul;49(7):2513-2524. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04486-3. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
Integrated pretreatment diffusion kurtosis imaging and serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels: a biomarker strategy for early assessment of radiotherapy outcomes in cervical cancer.
联合预处理扩散峰度成像和血清鳞状细胞癌抗原水平:一种用于早期评估宫颈癌放疗效果的生物标志物策略。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 May;49(5):1502-1511. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04270-3. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
4
T1 mapping as a quantitative imaging biomarker for diagnosing cervical cancer: a comparison with diffusion kurtosis imaging.T1 映射作为一种定量成像生物标志物用于诊断宫颈癌:与扩散峰度成像的比较。
BMC Med Imaging. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12880-024-01191-x.
5
Added-value of 3D amide proton transfer MRI in assessing prognostic factors of cervical cancer: a comparative study with multiple model diffusion-weighted imaging.3D酰胺质子转移磁共振成像在评估宫颈癌预后因素中的附加值:与多模型扩散加权成像的对比研究
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Dec 1;13(12):8157-8172. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-324. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
6
T1 mapping and multimodel diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of cervical cancer: a preliminary study.T1 映射和多模型弥散加权成像在宫颈癌评估中的应用:一项初步研究。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Aug;96(1148):20220952. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220952. Epub 2023 May 15.
7
Cervical Carcinoma: Evaluation Using Diffusion MRI With a Fractional Order Calculus Model and its Correlation With Histopathologic Findings.宫颈癌:使用分数阶微积分模型的扩散磁共振成像评估及其与组织病理学结果的相关性
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 5;12:851677. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.851677. eCollection 2022.
8
Analysis of quantitative and semi-quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant cervical tumors.DCE-MRI定量和半定量参数在宫颈良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的分析
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Nov 15;13(11):12228-12234. eCollection 2021.
9
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of primary cervical cancer in the detection of sub-centimetre metastatic lymph nodes.原发性宫颈癌的弥散加权磁共振成像在检测亚厘米转移性淋巴结中的应用。
Cancer Imaging. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00303-4.